Hard gap in epitaxial semiconductor–superconductor nanowires
Source abstract
Abstract
Many present and future applications of superconductivity would benefit from electrostatic control of carrier density and tunnelling rates, the hallmark of semiconductor devices. One particularly exciting application is the realization of topological superconductivity as a basis for quantum information processing. Proposals in this direction based on the proximity effect in semiconductor nanowires are appealing because the key ingredients are currently in hand. However, previous instances of proximitized semiconductors show significant tunnelling conductance below the superconducting gap, suggesting a continuum of subgap states--a situation that nullifies topological protection. Here, we report a hard superconducting gap induced by the proximity effect in a semiconductor, using epitaxial InAs-Al semiconductor-superconductor nanowires. The hard gap, together with favourable material properties and gate-tunability, makes this new hybrid system attractive for a number of applications, as well as fundamental studies of mesoscopic superconductivity.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Topological Materials and Phenomena · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Kitaev, A. Y. Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires. Phys. Usp. 44, 131–136 (2001).10.1070/1063-7869/44/10S/S29 ↗
2. Nayak, C., Simon, S. H., Stern, A., Freedman, M. & Das Sarma, S. Non Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083–1159 (2008).10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1083 ↗
3. Alicea, J., Oreg, Y., Refael, G., von Oppen, F. & Fisher, M. P. A. Non-Abelian statistics and topological quantum information processing in 1D wire networks. Nature Phys. 7, 412–417 (2011).10.1038/nphys1915 ↗
4. Lutchyn, R. M., Sau, J. D. & Das Sarma, S. Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor–superconductor heterostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 077001 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.077001 ↗
5. Oreg, Y., Refael, G. & von Oppen, F. Helical liquids and Majorana bound states in quantum wires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.177002 ↗
6. Cheng, M., Lutchyn, R. M. & Das Sarma, S. Topological protection of Majorana qubits. Phys. Rev. B 85, 165124 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.85.165124 ↗
7. Rainis, D. & Loss, D. Majorana qubit decoherence by quasiparticle poisoning. Phys. Rev. B 85, 174533 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.85.174533 ↗
8. Mourik, V. et al. Signatures of Majorana fermions in hybrid superconductor–semiconductor nanowire devices. Science 336, 1003–1007 (2012).10.1126/science.1222360 ↗
9. Das, A. et al. Zero-bias peaks and splitting in an Al–InAs nanowire topological superconductor as a signature of Majorana fermions. Nature Phys. 8, 887–895 (2012).10.1038/nphys2479 ↗
10. Deng, M. T. et al. Anomalous zero-bias conductance peak in a Nb–InSb nanowire–Nb hybrid device. Nano Lett. 12, 6414–6419 (2012).10.1021/nl303758w ↗
11. Churchill, H. O. H. et al. Superconductor–nanowire devices from tunneling to the multichannel regime: Zero-bias oscillations and magnetoconductance crossover. Phys. Rev. B 87, 241401 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.241401 ↗
12. Takei, S., Fregoso, B. M., Hui, H-Y., Lobos, A. M. & Das Sarma, S. Soft superconducting gap in semiconductor Majorana nanowires. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 186803 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.186803 ↗
13. Krogstrup, P. et al. Junctions in axial III–V heterostructure nanowires obtained via an interchange of group III elements. Nano Lett. 9, 3689–3693 (2009).10.1021/nl901348d ↗
14. Krogstrup, P. et al. Epitaxy of semiconductor–superconductor nanowires. Nature Mater. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmat4176 (2015).10.1038/nmat4176 ↗
15. Chang, W., Manucharyan, V. E., Jespersen, T. S., Nygård, J. & Marcus, C. M. Tunneling spectroscopy of quasiparticle bound states in a spinful Josephson junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 217005 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.217005 ↗
16. Finck, A. D. K., Van Harlingen, D. J., Mohseni, P. K., Jung, K. & Li, X. Anomalous modulation of a zero-bias peak in a hybrid nanowire–superconductor device. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 126406 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.126406 ↗
17. Beenakker, C. W. J. Quantum transport in semiconductor–superconductor microjunctions. Phys. Rev. B 46, 12841–12844 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevB.46.12841 ↗
18. Blonder, G. E., Tinkham, M. & Klapwijk, T. M. Transition from metallic to tunneling regimes in superconducting microconstrictions: Excess current, charge imbalance, and supercurrent conversion. Phys. Rev. B 25, 4515–4532 (1982).10.1103/PhysRevB.25.4515 ↗
19. Chuang, S. et al. Ballistic InAs nanowire transistors. Nano Lett. 13, 555–558 (2013).10.1021/nl3040674 ↗
20. Ford, A. C., Kumar, S. B., Kapadia, R., Guo, J. & Javey, A. Observation of degenerate one-dimensional sub-bands in cylindrical InAs nanowires. Nano Lett. 12, 1340–1343 (2012).10.1021/nl203895x ↗
21. Yu, L. Bound state in superconductors with paramagnetic impurities. Acta Phys. Sin. 21, 75–91 (1965).10.7498/aps.21.75 ↗
22. Shiba, H. Classical spins in superconductors. Prog. Theor. Phys. 40, 435–451 (1968).10.1143/PTP.40.435 ↗
23. Rusinov, A. I. Theory of gapless superconductivity in alloys containing paramagnetic impurities. Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 1101–1106 (1969).
24. Koerting, V., Andersen, B. M., Flensberg, K. & Paaske, J. Nonequilibrium transport via spin-induced subgap states in superconductor/quantum dot/normal metal cotunnel junctions. Phys Rev. B 82, 2451081–2451084 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.82.245108 ↗
25. Deacon, R. S. et al. Tunneling spectroscopy of Andreev energy levels in a quantum dot coupled to a superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 076805 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.076805 ↗
26. Lee, E. J. H. et al. Spin-resolved Andreev levels and parity crossings in hybrid superconductor–semiconductor nanostructures. Nature Nanotech. 9, 79–84 (2014).10.1038/nnano.2013.267 ↗
27. Dirks, T. et al. Transport through Andreev bound states in a graphene quantum dot. Nature Phys. 7, 386–390 (2011).10.1038/nphys1911 ↗
28. Pillet, J-D. et al. Andreev bound states in supercurrent-carrying carbon nanotubes revealed. Nature Phys. 6, 965–969 (2010).10.1038/nphys1811 ↗
29. Meng, T., Florens, S. & Simon, P. Self-consistent description of Andreev bound states in Josephson quantum dot devices. Phys. Rev. B 79, 224521 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.79.224521 ↗
30. Deacon, R. S. et al. Kondo-enhanced andreev transport in single self-assembled InAs quantum dots contacted with normal and superconducting leads. Phys. Rev. B 81, 121308 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.81.121308 ↗
31. Vecino, E., Martín-Rodero, A. & Yeyati, A. L. Josephson current through a correlated quantum level: Andreev states and π junction behavior. Phys. Rev. B 68, 035105 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.68.035105 ↗
32. Tinkham, M. Introduction to Superconductivity 2nd edn (Dover, 2004).
33. Wunnicke, O. Gate capacitance of back-gated nanowire field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 083102 (2006).10.1063/1.2337853 ↗
34. Doh, Y-J. et al. Tunable supercurrent through semiconductor nanowires. Science 309, 272–275 (2005).10.1126/science.1113523 ↗
35. Jespersen, T. S., Polianski, M. L., Sørensen, C. B., Flensberg, K. & Nygård, J. Mesoscopic conductance fluctuations in InAs nanowire-based SNS junctions. New J. Phys. 11, 113025 (2009).10.1088/1367-2630/11/11/113025 ↗