Length scaling of carbon nanotube transistors
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon nanotube field-effect transistors are strong candidates in replacing or supplementing silicon technology. Although theoretical studies have projected that nanotube transistors will perform well at nanoscale device dimensions, most experimental studies have been carried out on devices that are about ten times larger than current silicon transistors. Here, we show that nanotube transistors maintain their performance as their channel length is scaled from 3 µm to 15 nm, with an absence of so-called short-channel effects. The 15-nm device has the shortest channel length and highest room-temperature conductance (0.7G₀) and transconductance (40 µS) of any nanotube transistor reported to date. We also show the first experimental evidence that nanotube device performance depends significantly on contact length, in contrast to some previous reports. Data for both channel and contact length scaling were gathered by constructing multiple devices on a single carbon nanotube. Finally, we demonstrate the performance of a nanotube transistor with channel and contact lengths of 20 nm, an on-current of 10 µA, an on/off current ratio of 1 x 10⁵, and peak transconductance of 20 µS. These results provide an experimental forecast for carbon nanotube device performance at dimensions suitable for future transistor technology nodes.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Graphene research and applications · Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Alam, K. & Lake, R. Performance metrics of a 5-nm, planar, top gate, carbon nanotube on insulator (COI) transistor. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 6, 186–190 (2007).10.1109/TNANO.2007.891821 ↗
2. Guo, J., Datta, S. & Lundstrom, M. A numerical study of scaling issues for Schottky-barrier carbon nanotube transistors. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 51, 172–177 (2004).10.1109/TED.2003.821883 ↗
3. Heinze, S. et al. Unexpected scaling of the performance of carbon nanotube Schottky-barrier transistors. Phys. Rev. B 68, 235418 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.68.235418 ↗
4. Léonard, F. & Stewart, D. A. Properties of short channel ballistic carbon nanotube transistors with ohmic contacts. Nanotechnology 17, 4699–4705 (2006).10.1088/0957-4484/17/18/029 ↗
5. Javey, A. et al. Self-aligned ballistic molecular transistors and electrically parallel nanotube arrays. Nano Lett. 4, 1319–1322 (2004).10.1021/nl049222b ↗
6. Seidel, R. V. et al. Sub-20-nm short channel carbon nanotube transistors. Nano Lett. 5, 147–150 (2005).10.1021/nl048312d ↗
7. Lin, Y. M. et al. High-performance dual-gate carbon nanotube FETs with 40-nm gate length. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 26, 823–825 (2005).10.1109/LED.2005.857704 ↗
8. Song, X. et al. Electrical transport measurements of the side-contacts and embedded-end-contacts of platinum leads on the same single-walled carbon nanotube. Nanotechnology 20, 195202 (2009).10.1088/0957-4484/20/19/195202 ↗
9. Nosho, Y. et al. Evidence of edge conduction at nanotube/metal contact in carbon nanotube devices. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 46, L474–L476 (2007).10.1143/JJAP.46.L474 ↗
10. Mann, D. et al. Ballistic transport in metallic nanotubes with reliable Pd ohmic contacts. Nano Lett. 3, 1541–1544 (2003).10.1021/nl034700o ↗
11. Franklin, A. D. et al. Can carbon nanotube transistors be scaled without performance degradation? IEDM Technical Digest 2009, 561–564 (2009).
12. Lan, C. et al. Measurement of metal/carbon nanotube contact resistance by adjusting contact length using laser ablation. Nanotechnology 19, 125703 (2008).10.1088/0957-4484/19/12/125703 ↗
13. Wakaya, F., Katayama, K. & Gamo, K. Contact resistance of multiwall carbon nanotubes. Microelectron. Eng. 67–68, 853–857 (2003).10.1016/S0167-9317(03)00147-3 ↗
14. Dresselhaus, M. S., Dresselhaus, G. & Avouris, P. Carbon Nanotubes: Synthesis, Structure, Properties and Applications (Springer, 2001).10.1007/3-540-39947-X ↗
15. Zhou, W., Rutherglen, C. & Burke, P. J. Wafer scale synthesis of dense aligned arrays of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nano Res. 1, 158–165 (2008).10.1007/s12274-008-8012-9 ↗
16. Patil, N. et al. Wafer-scale growth and transfer of aligned single-walled carbon nanotubes. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 8, 498–504 (2009).10.1109/TNANO.2009.2016562 ↗
17. Chen, Z. et al. The role of metal–nanotube contact in the performance of carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Nano Lett. 5, 1497–1502 (2005).10.1021/nl0508624 ↗
18. Javey, A. et al. High-kappa dielectrics for advanced carbon-nanotube transistors and logic gates. Nature Mater. 1, 241–246 (2002).10.1038/nmat769 ↗
19. Chen, Z. H. et al. Externally assembled gate-all-around carbon nanotube field-effect transistor. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 29, 183–185 (2008).10.1109/LED.2007.914069 ↗
20. Franklin, A. D. et al. Toward surround gates on vertical single-walled carbon nanotube devices. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 27, 821–826 (2009).10.1116/1.3054266 ↗
21. Purewal, M. et al. Scaling of resistance and electron mean free path of single-walled carbon nanotubes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 186808 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.186808 ↗
22. Schroder, D. K. Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization (Wiley, 2006).10.1002/0471749095 ↗
23. Datta, S. Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).10.1017/CBO9781139164313 ↗
24. Guo, J. & Lundstrom, M. Role of phonon scattering in carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 193103 (2005).10.1063/1.1923183 ↗
25. Javey, A. et al. Ballistic carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Nature 424, 654–657 (2003).10.1038/nature01797 ↗
26. Clifford, J. et al. Electrostatics of partially gated carbon nanotube FETs. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 3, 281–286 (2004).10.1109/TNANO.2004.828539 ↗
27. Heinze, S. et al. Carbon nanotubes as Schottky barrier transistors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 106801 (2002).10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.106801 ↗
28. Makarovski, A. et al. Four-probe measurements of carbon nanotubes with narrow metal contacts. Phys. Rev. B 76, 161405(R) (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.76.161405 ↗
29. Venugopal, A., Colombo, L. & Vogel, E. M. Contact resistance in few and multilayer graphene devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 013512 (2010).10.1063/1.3290248 ↗
30. Knoch, J. & Appenzeller, J. Tunneling phenomena in carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 205, 679–694 (2008).10.1002/pssa.200723528 ↗
31. Nemec, N., Tománek, D. & Cuniberti, G. Contact dependence of carrier injection in carbon nanotubes: an ab initio study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 076802 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.076802 ↗