journal article·2026-07-01

Spin Crossover Heterostructures for Inducing Strain: Two Contrasting Responses in MoS 2 Nanosheets

Junyan Liu, Łukasz Dobrzycki, Daniel R. Talham

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 18· Issue 25
Publisher page

Abstract

Spin-crossover (SCO) materials often undergo large, reversible lattice changes associated with the spin-state transitions. Coupling such phase-transition solids with two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors provides a promising route toward dynamically tunable strain engineering. Here, we investigate induced strain in MoS 2 nanosheets deposited directly onto SCO single-crystal substrates using variable-temperature Raman and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. Two representative SCO systems with distinct structural motifs are examined: the molecular complex [{Fe(NCSe)(py)} 2 (μ-bpypz) 2 ] ( 1 ), exhibiting a below room temperature spin crossover with ∼4% volume change, and the Hofmann-like framework [Fe(pyrazine){Au(CN) 2 } 2 ] ( 2 ), displaying an above room temperature spin crossover with ∼6% volume change. Despite both substrates undergoing cooperative spin transitions, the MoS 2 layers exhibit fundamentally different optoelectronic responses. In the MoS 2 - 1 heterostructure, the spin transition induces efficient and uniform strain transfer, leading to a reversible Raman shift of the E 2g 1 mode and a hysteretic photoluminescence peak shift that directly reflects bandgap modulation by strain. In contrast, the MoS 2 - 2 heterostructure displays an unconventional response characterized by a pronounced hysteresis in PL intensity with negligible PL peak shift, accompanied by a Raman signature indicative of compressive strain that is opposite to expectations from simple elastic coupling. By comparing these systems with previously reported MoS 2 –SCO heterostructures, we demonstrate that SCO-induced strain in MoS 2 cannot be predicted solely by the magnitude of the substrate volume change. Instead, the crystallographic orientation, surface chemistry, and interfacial conformity collectively determine whether the MoS 2 response is governed by uniform lattice strain, bandgap modulation, or morphology-mediated recombination processes. These findings establish SCO single crystals as versatile mechanical phase change materials capable of programming distinct optoelectronic functionalities in 2D materials through rational interface design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Heusler alloys: electronic and magnetic properties · Magnetic properties of thin films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry

University of Florida

Center for X-ray Crystallography, Department of Chemistry

Funding

Division of Materials Research · University of Florida · National Science Foundation (NSF)

References (63)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/jacs.0c0544010.1021/jacs.0c05440 ↗
2. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0039810.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00398 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0014610.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00146 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20170440710.1002/adma.201704407 ↗
5. 10.3390/act1312052410.3390/act13120524 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.118238310.1126/science.1182383 ↗
7. 10.1021/ja404192g10.1021/ja404192g ↗
8. 10.1038/nchem.212310.1038/nchem.2123 ↗
9. 10.1038/s42004-019-0121-810.1038/s42004-019-0121-8 ↗
10. 10.1063/5.002059610.1063/5.0020596 ↗
11. 10.1039/C6CC06235K10.1039/C6CC06235K ↗
12. 10.1039/c1cs15042a10.1039/c1cs15042a ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20170386210.1002/adma.201703862 ↗
14. 10.1002/anie.19942024110.1002/anie.199420241 ↗
15. 10.1039/c1cs15046d10.1039/c1cs15046d ↗
16. 10.1002/aisy.20220043210.1002/aisy.202200432 ↗
17. 10.1088/1361-665X/ae34ff10.1088/1361-665X/ae34ff ↗
18. 10.1039/C4TC00267A10.1039/C4TC00267A ↗
19. 10.1039/D1MH00966D10.1039/D1MH00966D ↗
20. 10.1039/D2MA00459C10.1039/D2MA00459C ↗
21. 10.1021/ja100246n10.1021/ja100246n ↗
22. 10.1126/science.107594810.1126/science.1075948 ↗
23. 10.1038/ncomms360710.1038/ncomms3607 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.03.02410.1016/j.ccr.2017.03.024 ↗
25. 10.3762/bjoc.9.3910.3762/bjoc.9.39 ↗
26. 10.1039/C3DT52520A10.1039/C3DT52520A ↗
27. 10.1002/andp.20190007610.1002/andp.201900076 ↗
28. 10.1039/D0TC05202G10.1039/D0TC05202G ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0378010.1021/acs.nanolett.6b03780 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20190357510.1002/adma.201903575 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41557-021-00795-y10.1038/s41557-021-00795-y ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matlet.2026.14007910.1016/j.matlet.2026.140079 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8DT02923G10.1039/C8DT02923G ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20211002710.1002/adma.202110027 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.4c0138910.1021/acs.chemmater.4c01389 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.poly.2006.09.00310.1016/j.poly.2006.09.003 ↗
37. 10.1039/B314211F10.1039/B314211F ↗
38. 10.1039/j1969000141510.1039/j19690001415 ↗
39. 10.1002/ejic.20160040610.1002/ejic.201600406 ↗
40. 10.1038/s41586-018-0574-410.1038/s41586-018-0574-4 ↗
41. 10.1002/anie.20140397110.1002/anie.201403971 ↗
42. 10.1021/nn100393710.1021/nn1003937 ↗
43. 10.1021/nl401474810.1021/nl4014748 ↗
44. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.08130710.1103/PhysRevB.87.081307 ↗
45. 10.1063/1.496621810.1063/1.4966218 ↗
46. 10.1021/nl903868w10.1021/nl903868w ↗
47. 10.1063/1.363640210.1063/1.3636402 ↗
48. 10.1002/pssr.20110558910.1002/pssr.201105589 ↗
49. 10.3390/magnetochemistry809010810.3390/magnetochemistry8090108 ↗
50. 10.1021/nl201874w10.1021/nl201874w ↗
51. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.11015010.1016/j.optmat.2020.110150 ↗
52. 10.1038/s41598-023-43756-w10.1038/s41598-023-43756-w ↗
53. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c0855610.1021/acs.jpcc.5c08556 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.494835710.1063/1.4948357 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.16140310.1103/PhysRevB.85.161403 ↗
56. 10.1021/nl401316610.1021/nl4013166 ↗
57. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0261510.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02615 ↗
58. 10.1002/adma.20160262610.1002/adma.201602626 ↗
59. 10.1002/anie.20140397110.1002/anie.201403971 ↗
60. 10.1021/ja800878f10.1021/ja800878f ↗
61. 10.1002/adom.20250067010.1002/adom.202500670 ↗
62. 10.1021/nl402875m10.1021/nl402875m ↗
63. 10.1039/C8NR05884A10.1039/C8NR05884A ↗