journal article·2026-03-11Open access

Harnessing the Synergy of Ti 3 C 2 T x /CuO Nanocomposites and Charge Transport of FET-Based Transducers for High-Performance Sensing

Kshitij RB Singh, Harshita Rai, Safalmani Pradhan, Shuichi Nagamatsu, Shyam S. Pandey

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The rapid evolution of organic field-effect transistors (OFETs) as versatile sensing platforms has primarily focused on architecture and probe engineering, often overlooking the intrinsic role of charge carrier mobility (μ) in transduction performance. Herein, we present a systematic study that correlates μ of polymer-based OFETs with critical sensing parameters using an extended-gate (EG) configuration for nonenzymatic glucose detection. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first EG-OFET study to quantitatively map how μ governs sensitivity, LOD/LOQ, and response time under an identical sensing architecture and measurement protocol. A novel nanocomposite, Ti 3 C 2 T x /CuO, was synthesized as the active sensing interface and integrated with OFETs fabricated from conjugated polymers (CPs) with varying μ, such as NR-P3HT, RR-P3HT, and DPP-TTT. Uniaxially aligned, edge-on oriented, and uniform thin films of these CPs used as active semiconducting elements of the OFETs were fabricated by the unidirectional floating film transfer method. We demonstrate that increasing μ significantly enhances sensitivity, lowers detection limits, and improves response time. This is supported through a high-μ DPP-TTT-based, OFET achieving a remarkable sensitivity of 0.52 V mM –1 cm –2 and a detection limit of 0.56 mM, surpassing even standard electrochemical platforms. By codesigning a catalytic Ti 3 C 2 T x /CuO extended-gate interface with mobility-engineered polymer transducers, we demonstrate a clear materials–transducer synergy in which higher μ enables stronger and faster electrical transduction of interfacial potential changes. These findings establish a μ-guided design rule for engineering next-generation EG-OFET sensors with improved sensitivity and speed. Thus, these findings bridge the gap between fundamental charge transport and applied sensing performance, establishing a new paradigm for engineering next-generation OFET sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Graduate School of Life Science and Systems Engineering, Kyushu Institute of Technology, 2-4 Hibikino, Wakamatsu, Kitakyushu 808-0196, Japan

i-Powered Energy System Research Center (i-PERC), The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan

Department of Physics and Information Technology, Kyushu Institute of Technology, 680-4 Kawazu, Iizuka, Fukuoka 820-8502, Japan

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology · Japan Science and Technology Agency

References (46)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-0-387-92134-110.1007/978-0-387-92134-1 ↗
2. 10.1109/TED.2017.267708610.1109/TED.2017.2677086 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41598-020-73471-910.1038/s41598-020-73471-9 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41528-022-00133-310.1038/s41528-022-00133-3 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20050115210.1002/adma.200501152 ↗
6. 10.1002/VIW.2020011510.1002/VIW.20200115 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.bios.2015.06.00210.1016/j.bios.2015.06.002 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.snb.2016.04.09510.1016/j.snb.2016.04.095 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2023.11123510.1016/j.dyepig.2023.111235 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.talo.2024.10039410.1016/j.talo.2024.100394 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.bios.2017.12.04110.1016/j.bios.2017.12.041 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.snb.2015.11.00510.1016/j.snb.2015.11.005 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41699-021-00223-210.1038/s41699-021-00223-2 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.mtchem.2024.10234410.1016/j.mtchem.2024.102344 ↗
15. 10.1007/s42823-024-00838-710.1007/s42823-024-00838-7 ↗
16. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5c0556010.1021/acs.langmuir.5c05560 ↗
17. 10.1039/D5EN00234F10.1039/D5EN00234F ↗
18. 10.1002/adfm.20253119610.1002/adfm.202531196 ↗
19. 10.1002/adma.20230101110.1002/adma.202301011 ↗
20. 10.1002/advs.20250256310.1002/advs.202502563 ↗
21. 10.1002/pssa.20237005110.1002/pssa.202370051 ↗
22. 10.3390/mi1506067710.3390/mi15060677 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.500056610.1063/1.5000566 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.orgel.2022.10669110.1016/j.orgel.2022.106691 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0284710.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02847 ↗
26. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0127510.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01275 ↗
27. 10.1039/D1RA02382A10.1039/D1RA02382A ↗
28. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0018110.1021/acsnano.6b00181 ↗
29. 10.1039/C8GC00961A10.1039/C8GC00961A ↗
30. 10.1088/0953-8984/24/17/17500210.1088/0953-8984/24/17/175002 ↗
31. 10.1021/acsomega.1c0404610.1021/acsomega.1c04046 ↗
32. 10.1002/pssa.20230023610.1002/pssa.202300236 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.cej.2023.14393210.1016/j.cej.2023.143932 ↗
34. 10.1039/B914100F10.1039/B914100F ↗
35. 10.1063/1.11783410.1063/1.117834 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.281866210.1063/1.2818662 ↗
37. 10.1039/C6TC02142E10.1039/C6TC02142E ↗
38. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199808)10:12<923:AID-ADMA923>3.0.CO;2-W10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199808)10:12<923:AID-ADMA923>3.0.CO;2-W ↗
39. 10.1038/s41598-023-28930-410.1038/s41598-023-28930-4 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.snb.2025.13888210.1016/j.snb.2025.138882 ↗
41. 10.2337/dc23-S00610.2337/dc23-S006 ↗
42. 10.2337/dc23-Sint10.2337/dc23-Sint ↗
43. WHO. Blood Glucose─Global Health Observatory (GHO) Data 2019 https://www.who.int/gho/ncd/risk_factors/blood_glucose/en/. (accessed June 15, 2019).
44. 10.2337/dci23-003610.2337/dci23-0036 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.15710.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.157 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsabm.4c0121310.1021/acsabm.4c01213 ↗