A Cryptographic Transistor with Stochastic Carrier Trapping and Detrapping for a True Random Number Generator
Source abstract
Abstract
A cryptographic transistor called a cryptosistor, based on CMOS technology, is demonstrated as a true random number generator (tRNG). It exploits stochastic carrier trapping and detrapping at a deliberately destabilized interface between the gate oxide and silicon channel. Three entropy sources contribute to randomness: impact ionization-generated carriers, jittered out-diffusion carriers, and carriers affected by trapping/detrapping. To enhance carrier variation, a low-quality tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) oxide deposited by chemical vapor deposition is used as the gate dielectric instead of conventional high-quality thermal oxide. Although TEOS is typically used as a stable interlayer dielectric, here a thin TEOS layer with unstable interface properties is intentionally employed to introduce randomness. This approach highlights the use of TEOS as a functional material, aiming to preserve the long-established advantages of CMOS technology, rather than pursuing entirely different materials. The cryptosistor's irregular voltage output is digitized by a compact, low-power ADC, and the resulting bits pass the NIST SP 800-22 randomness test. As a standard transistor component, the cryptosistor can be easily integrated into chips without additional fabrication steps, offering enhanced security for device-to-chip, chip-to-chip, and chip-to-system communication in hyper-connected environments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Chaos-based Image/Signal Encryption · Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security · Cryptographic Implementations and Security
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
NAND R&D, Samsung Electronics
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Khan R. · 2012
2. 10.1109/MWC.2017.160042110.1109/MWC.2017.1600421 ↗
3. 10.1109/MSPEC.2016.757252410.1109/MSPEC.2016.7572524 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.future.2017.07.06010.1016/j.future.2017.07.060 ↗
5. 10.1109/TVLSI.2012.223170710.1109/TVLSI.2012.2231707 ↗
6. 10.1109/TC.2010.3210.1109/TC.2010.32 ↗
7. Halak B. · 2016
8. 10.1038/s41928-018-0039-710.1038/s41928-018-0039-7 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41928-018-0146-510.1038/s41928-018-0146-5 ↗
10. 10.1038/nature0900810.1038/nature09008 ↗
11. Choi W. H. · 2014
12. 10.1109/TED.2016.253779210.1109/TED.2016.2537792 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-017-00869-x10.1038/s41467-017-00869-x ↗
14. Chen H. · 2018
15. Yang, K.; Dong, Q.; Wang, Z.; Shih, Y.C.; Chih, Y.D.; Chang, J.; Blaauw, D.; Sylvester, D. A. 28 nm Integrated True Random Number Generator Harvesting Entropy from MRAM. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on VLSI Circuits ; IEEE, 2018.10.1109/VLSIC.2018.8502431 ↗
16. 10.1002/aelm.20180054310.1002/aelm.201800543 ↗
17. 10.1002/aelm.20190111710.1002/aelm.201901117 ↗
18. 10.1038/s41467-021-23184-y10.1038/s41467-021-23184-y ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-024-49149-510.1038/s41467-024-49149-5 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0358110.1021/acsnano.3c03581 ↗
21. Wali A. · ACS Nano · 2021 · 15 · 1780410.1021/acsnano.1c05984 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0114510.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01145 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41928-021-00569-x10.1038/s41928-021-00569-x ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20220616810.1002/adma.202206168 ↗
25. 10.1038/s41467-024-54283-110.1038/s41467-024-54283-1 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-022-33053-x10.1038/s41467-022-33053-x ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c0395710.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03957 ↗
28. Kim E. · 2017
29. 10.1109/JSSC.2017.269483310.1109/JSSC.2017.2694833 ↗
30. Pamula V. R. · 2018
31. 10.1109/JSSC.2018.288635010.1109/JSSC.2018.2886350 ↗
32. Taneja S. · 2021
33. He Y. · 2023
34. Brown J. · 2018
35. Xiao Y. · 2019
36. Yang J. · 2020
37. 10.1126/sciadv.adk604210.1126/sciadv.adk6042 ↗
38. Yang K. · 2015
39. Satpathy S. · 2014
40. 10.1109/JSSC.2016.255849010.1109/JSSC.2016.2558490 ↗
41. 10.1109/TNANO.2019.295609210.1109/TNANO.2019.2956092 ↗
42. Shen C. · 2007
43. 10.1088/0268-1242/7/3B/12310.1088/0268-1242/7/3B/123 ↗
44. 10.1109/LED.2019.295862310.1109/LED.2019.2958623 ↗
45. 10.1109/LED.2020.300195310.1109/LED.2020.3001953 ↗
46. 10.1109/LED.2018.285609210.1109/LED.2018.2856092 ↗
47. 10.1109/LED.2013.229727710.1109/LED.2013.2297277 ↗
48. 10.1002/pssa.221124022510.1002/pssa.2211240225 ↗
49. 10.1063/1.35377710.1063/1.353777 ↗
50. Neamen D. A. · 1997
51. 10.1109/LED.2015.240042210.1109/LED.2015.2400422 ↗
52. von Harrtman M. · 200710.1007/978-1-4020-5910-0 ↗
53. Seepers R. M. · 2015
54. 10.1109/TSP.2004.83992410.1109/TSP.2004.839924 ↗
55. 10.1109/TSP.2012.221055010.1109/TSP.2012.2210550 ↗
56. 10.1109/TED.2024.346918110.1109/TED.2024.3469181 ↗
57. Murmann, B. ADC Performance Survey 1997–2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/bmurmann/ADC-survey.
58. Lim S. · IDEC J. Integr. Circuits Syst. · 2017 · 3 · 19
59. Lee S. H. · IDEC J. Integr. Circuits Syst. · 2023 · 9 · 43