journal article·2020-03-04

Single-Cell Response to the Rigidity of Semiconductor Nanomembranes on Compliant Substrates

Nadeem Abdul, Matthew N. Rush, Jiri Nohava, Ursula Amezcua, Andrew P. Shreve, Francesca Cavallo

Publisher page

Abstract

Single-crystalline semiconductor nanomembranes (NMs) bonded to compliant substrates are increasingly used for biomedical research and in health care. Nevertheless, there is a limited understanding of how individual cells sense the unique mechanical properties of these substrates and adjust their behavior in response to them. In this work, we performed proliferation assays, cytoskeleton analysis, and focal adhesion (FA) studies for NIH-3T3 fibroblasts on 220 and 20 nm single-crystalline Si on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) substrates with an elastic modulus of ∼31 kPa. We also characterized cell response on bulk Si as a reference. Our in vitro studies show that varying the thickness of the NM between 20 and 220 nm affects the proliferation rate of the cells, their cytoskeleton, fiber organization, spread area, and degree of FA. For example, cultured cells on 220 nm Si/PMDS exhibit the same response as on bulk Si, that is, they are well-spread with a pentagonal (or dendritic) shape and show a good organization of stress fibers and FAs. On the other hand, the cells on 20 nm Si/PDMS are spherical, with fiber organization and FAs in undetectable levels. We explained the results of our in vitro studies through a shear-lag mechanical model. The calculated FA-substrate contact stiffnesses for fibroblasts on bulk Si and 220 nm Si/PDMS closely match, and they are significantly higher than the stiffness of the integrin clutches and the plaque. Conversely, focal contacts with 20 nm Si/PDMS have comparable lateral compliance to adhesion-mediating intracellular organisms. In conclusion, our work relies on recent advances in NM technology to fill a critical knowledge gap about how individual cells sense and react to the mechanical properties of NM-based substrates. Our findings will have a major impact on the design of flexible electronic materials for applications in biomedical science and health care.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Cellular Mechanics and Interactions · 3D Printing in Biomedical Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for High Technology Materials, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States

Center for Biomedical Engineering and Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, United States

Anton Paar TriTec SA, Vernets 6, 2035 Corcelles, Switzerland

Funding

University of New Mexico

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20150415010.1002/adma.201504150 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.120615710.1126/science.1206157 ↗
3. 10.1002/cnma.20160019110.1002/cnma.201600191 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20150537210.1002/adma.201505372 ↗
5. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aat843710.1126/scitranslmed.aat8437 ↗
6. 10.1002/adhm.20150009710.1002/adhm.201500097 ↗
7. 10.1126/sciadv.aau635610.1126/sciadv.aau6356 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20190206210.1002/adma.201902062 ↗
9. 10.3390/ma1102018710.3390/ma11020187 ↗
10. 10.1002/adfm.20160454510.1002/adfm.201604545 ↗
11. 10.1126/sciadv.aav965310.1126/sciadv.aav9653 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl070624410.1021/nl0706244 ↗
13. 10.1109/tcpmt.2015.241780110.1109/tcpmt.2015.2417801 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn200461g10.1021/nn200461g ↗
15. 10.1557/jmr.2011.810.1557/jmr.2011.8 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep0391010.1038/srep03910 ↗
17. 10.1038/ncomms235010.1038/ncomms2350 ↗
18. 10.1186/1556-276x-6-40210.1186/1556-276x-6-402 ↗
19. 10.1021/nn900094710.1021/nn9000947 ↗
20. 10.1103/physrevapplied.9.02403710.1103/physrevapplied.9.024037 ↗
21. 10.1116/1.58156810.1116/1.581568 ↗
22. 10.1016/s0169-4332(03)00486-010.1016/s0169-4332(03)00486-0 ↗
23. 10.1371/journal.pone.005149910.1371/journal.pone.0051499 ↗
24. 10.1039/b903043c10.1039/b903043c ↗
25. 10.1021/la970525d10.1021/la970525d ↗
26. 10.1149/1.210865110.1149/1.2108651 ↗
27. 10.1088/0022-3727/44/32/32510710.1088/0022-3727/44/32/325107 ↗
28. 10.1557/jmr.1992.156410.1557/jmr.1992.1564 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.5b0974610.1021/acsami.5b09746 ↗
30. 10.1039/c7bm00853h10.1039/c7bm00853h ↗
31. 10.1021/la303091k10.1021/la303091k ↗
32. 10.1021/la201760w10.1021/la201760w ↗
33. 10.1016/0092-8674(79)90300-310.1016/0092-8674(79)90300-3 ↗
34. 10.1016/s0006-3495(03)74752-310.1016/s0006-3495(03)74752-3 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.03610.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.036 ↗
36. 10.1038/nmat333910.1038/nmat3339 ↗
37. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.383-390.722010.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.383-390.7220 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.04410.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
39. 10.1016/s0006-3495(04)-510.1016/s0006-3495(04)-5 ↗
40. 10.1529/biophysj.105.07711510.1529/biophysj.105.077115 ↗
41. 10.1073/pnas.040353910110.1073/pnas.0403539101 ↗
42. 10.1529/biophysj.107.12739910.1529/biophysj.107.127399 ↗
43. 10.1073/pnas.040587310210.1073/pnas.0405873102 ↗
44. 10.1073/pnas.162048611410.1073/pnas.1620486114 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.04810.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.048 ↗
46. 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01453-x10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01453-x ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.09.01110.1016/j.ejcb.2005.09.011 ↗
48. 10.1529/biophysj.106.10138610.1529/biophysj.106.101386 ↗
49. 10.1073/pnas.111781010910.1073/pnas.1117810109 ↗
50. 10.1002/cm.2038210.1002/cm.20382 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.04410.1016/j.cell.2006.06.044 ↗
52. 10.1088/0953-8984/22/19/19411010.1088/0953-8984/22/19/194110 ↗
53. 10.1063/1.11863910.1063/1.118639 ↗
54. Colchero J. · 1997 · 330 · 21710.1007/978-94-011-5646-2_13 ↗
55. 10.1371/journal.pone.009989610.1371/journal.pone.0099896 ↗
56. 10.1038/s41598-017-14932-610.1038/s41598-017-14932-6 ↗
57. 10.1073/pnas.120799711010.1073/pnas.1207997110 ↗