pH-Sensitive Visible or Shortwave Infrared Quantum Dot Nanoprobes Using Conformation-Switchable Copolymeric Ligands
Source abstract
Abstract
Intracellular and extracellular pH are key parameters in many physiological processes and diseases. For example, the extracellular pH of the tumor micro-environment is slightly more acidic than in healthy tissue. In vivo mapping of the extracellular pH within the tumor would therefore improve our understanding of the tumor physiology. Fluorescent semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) represent interesting probes for in vivo imaging, in particular in the shortwave infrared (SWIR) range. Here, pH-sensitive QD nanoprobes are developed using a conformation-switchable surface chemistry. The central fluorescent QD is coated with a copolymer ligand and conjugated to gold nanoparticle quenchers. As the pH decreases from physiological (7.5) to slightly acidic (5.5-6), the copolymer reversibly shrinks, which increases the energy transfer between the QD and the gold quenchers and modulates the QD fluorescence signal. This enables the design of ratiometric QD probes for biological pH range emitting in the visible or SWIR range. In addition, these probes can be easily encapsulated and remain functional within ghost erythrocyte membranes, which facilitate their in vivo application.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LPEM, UMR 8213, ESPCI Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, 75005 Paris, France
Funding
Agence Nationale de la Recherche
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.16610.1038/nphoton.2014.166 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.01610.1016/j.addr.2012.08.016 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.110427410.1126/science.1104274 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat139010.1038/nmat1390 ↗
5. 10.1117/1.326967510.1117/1.3269675 ↗
6. 10.1117/1.jbo.19.5.05120810.1117/1.jbo.19.5.051208 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0846310.1021/acsnano.8b08463 ↗
8. 10.1021/ja056326v10.1021/ja056326v ↗
9. 10.1021/cm400812v10.1021/cm400812v ↗
10. 10.1039/c4ra06098a10.1039/c4ra06098a ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20150263210.1002/adfm.201502632 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41551-017-005610.1038/s41551-017-0056 ↗
13. 10.1038/nbt92010.1038/nbt920 ↗
14. 10.1021/nl052405t10.1021/nl052405t ↗
15. 10.1021/nl080141f10.1021/nl080141f ↗
16. Tannock I. F. · Cancer Res. · 1989 · 49 · 4373
17. 10.1007/BF0012121410.1007/BF00121214 ↗
18. 10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-419310.1158/0008-5472.can-05-4193 ↗
19. 10.3389/fphys.2013.0037010.3389/fphys.2013.00370 ↗
20. 10.1007/978-3-319-67577-010.1007/978-3-319-67577-0 ↗
21. 10.1021/ja061899910.1021/ja0618999 ↗
22. 10.1021/nn203807710.1021/nn2038077 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20160553310.1002/adfm.201605533 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41467-019-09043-x10.1038/s41467-019-09043-x ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20050227910.1002/anie.200502279 ↗
26. 10.1021/ja042939g10.1021/ja042939g ↗
27. 10.1021/jp025698c10.1021/jp025698c ↗
28. 10.1021/jp056358510.1021/jp0563585 ↗
29. 10.1021/jp104311j10.1021/jp104311j ↗
30. 10.1021/nn900863a10.1021/nn900863a ↗
31. 10.1039/c3993000009610.1039/c39930000096 ↗
32. 10.1021/ac070208410.1021/ac0702084 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0570510.1021/acsnano.5b05705 ↗
34. 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b0145310.1021/acs.macromol.5b01453 ↗
35. 10.1021/la900148m10.1021/la900148m ↗
36. 10.1021/la203968t10.1021/la203968t ↗
37. 10.1021/la302896x10.1021/la302896x ↗
38. 10.1021/ja043940i10.1021/ja043940i ↗
39. 10.1021/nl071729+10.1021/nl071729+ ↗
40. 10.1021/jp407259r10.1021/jp407259r ↗
41. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0003010.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00030 ↗
42. 10.1002/ijc.2915310.1002/ijc.29153 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b0075810.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00758 ↗
44. 10.1371/journal.pone.007854210.1371/journal.pone.0078542 ↗
45. 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90199-510.1016/0005-2736(73)90199-5 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0576410.1021/acsnano.5b05764 ↗
47. 10.1021/ja710437r10.1021/ja710437r ↗