Air-Pressure Tunable Depletion Width, Rectification Behavior, and Charge Conduction in Oxide Nanotubes
Source abstract
Abstract
Metal-oxide nanotubes provide large surface areas and functionalizable surfaces for a variety of optical and electronic applications. Here we report air-tunable rectifying behavior, depletion width modulation, and two-dimensional (2D) charge conduction in hollow titanium-dioxide nanotubes. The metal contact forms a Schottky-diode in the nanotubes, and the rectification factor (on/off ratio) can be varied by more than 3 orders of magnitude (1-2 × 10(3)) as the air pressure is increased from 2 mTorr to atmospheric pressure. This behavior is explained using a change in depletion width of these thin nanotubes by adsorption of water vapor on both surfaces of a hollow nanotube, and the resulting formation of a metal-insulator-semiconductor (MIS) junction, which controls the 2D charge conduction properties in thin oxide nanotubes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, ‡Materials Science and Engineering, and §Renewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, United States
Funding
Division of Chemical, Bioengineering, Environmental, and Transport Systems
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Ohno Y. · Nature · 1999 · 402 · 79010.1038/45509 ↗
2. Oregan B. · Nature · 1991 · 353 · 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
3. Chen X. · Sens. Actuators, B · 2013 · 177 · 17810.1016/j.snb.2012.10.134 ↗
4. Kolmakov A. · Annu. Rev. of Mater. Res. · 2004 · 34 · 15110.1146/annurev.matsci.34.040203.112141 ↗
5. Leonard F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2006 · 97 · 02680410.1103/PhysRevLett.97.026804 ↗
6. Gong D. · J. Mater. Res. · 2001 · 16 · 333110.1557/JMR.2001.0457 ↗
7. Nah Y. C. · ChemPhysChem · 2010 · 11 · 269810.1002/cphc.201000276 ↗
8. Alivov Y. · Nanoscale · 2014 · 6 · 1083910.1039/C4NR02417F ↗
9. Alivov Y. · Nanotechnology · 2014 · 25 · 38520210.1088/0957-4484/25/38/385202 ↗
10. Linsebigler A. L. · Chem. Rev. · 1995 · 95 · 73510.1021/cr00035a013 ↗
11. Harnack O. · Nano Lett. · 2003 · 3 · 109710.1021/nl034240z ↗
12. Hernandez-Ramirez F. · Nanotechnology · 2006 · 17 · 557710.1088/0957-4484/17/22/009 ↗
13. Hernandez-Ramirez F. · Phys. Rev. B · 2007 · 76 · 08542910.1103/PhysRevB.76.085429 ↗
14. Leonard F. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2009 · 102 · 10680510.1103/PhysRevLett.102.106805 ↗
15. Penner R. M. · Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. · 2012 · 55 · 46110.1146/annurev-anchem-062011-143007 ↗
16. Barsan N. · J. Electroceram. · 2001 · 7 · 14310.1023/A:1014405811371 ↗
17. Singh V. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 59710.1021/nl403783d ↗
18. Zhang Z. Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 89 · 07310210.1063/1.2177362 ↗
19. Bai X. D. · Nano Lett. · 2007 · 7 · 63210.1021/nl062540l ↗
20. Hattori K. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1982 · 53 · 690610.1063/1.330032 ↗
21. Card H. C. · J. Phys. D:Appl. Phys. · 1971 · 4 · 158910.1088/0022-3727/4/10/319 ↗
22. Sze S. M. · 2007
23. Kim J. R. · Nanotechnology · 2002 · 13 · 70110.1088/0957-4484/13/5/333 ↗
24. Pandey S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 01211110.1063/1.3608162 ↗