Impact of Interface Layers on Luminescence Imaging of Organic Solar Cells: Discriminating ETL from HTL Defects
Source abstract
Abstract
Over the last two decades, organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices have seen their efficiency increase, while long-term stability and upscaling have been demonstrated for first-generation modules. Since the maturity level of this technology has now improved, techniques for rapid quality control have become relevant. Imaging techniques such as photo- and electroluminescence have already been used for this purpose. However, defects could only be localized either in the active layer or in interface layers, without being able to distinguish between defects located in the ETL from those within the HTL. Here, we present a simple method to unambiguously discriminate between ETL and HTL defects. Furthermore, we demonstrate the strong impact of HTL thickness on the detected photoluminescence signal. Our approach will help avoid misinterpretations in luminescence experiments and gain an understanding of device failure during processing or aging.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LITEN, INES, F-73375 Le Bourget du Lac, France
ARMOR SAS, 2 rue des Bauches, F-44118 La Chevrolière, France
Funding
Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie · ARMOR company
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s11426-019-9457-510.1007/s11426-019-9457-5 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.aat261210.1126/science.aat2612 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.solmat.2012.09.03110.1016/j.solmat.2012.09.031 ↗
4. 10.1039/c3ee43212b10.1039/c3ee43212b ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.00210.1016/j.joule.2017.08.002 ↗
6. https://www.asca.com/.
7. https://www.heliatek.com/.
8. https://csembrasil.com.br/.
9. 10.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.00910.1016/j.solmat.2006.04.009 ↗
10. 10.1002/sia.198110.1002/sia.1981 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.solmat.2008.01.00510.1016/j.solmat.2008.01.005 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20110418710.1002/adma.201104187 ↗
13. 10.1039/c2ee03508a10.1039/c2ee03508a ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20110049610.1002/aenm.201100496 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.10.00510.1016/j.solmat.2011.10.005 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.355386410.1063/1.3553864 ↗
17. 10.1002/pip.312110.1002/pip.3121 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1566-1199(02)00051-410.1016/S1566-1199(02)00051-4 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5TC01531F10.1039/C5TC01531F ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b0187610.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01876 ↗
21. 10.1021/ja210029w10.1021/ja210029w ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20060109810.1002/adfm.200601098 ↗
23. 10.1002/aenm.20140008110.1002/aenm.201400081 ↗
24. 10.1002/pssr.20130803910.1002/pssr.201308039 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.solmat.2010.01.02810.1016/j.solmat.2010.01.028 ↗
26. 10.1002/pssr.20090330410.1002/pssr.200903304 ↗
27. 10.1002/pip.80310.1002/pip.803 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.492934310.1063/1.4929343 ↗
29. 10.1002/pssr.20090317510.1002/pssr.200903175 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.280456210.1063/1.2804562 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.298258810.1063/1.2982588 ↗
32. 10.1002/pssa.20143188610.1002/pssa.201431886 ↗
33. 10.1002/aenm.20160175010.1002/aenm.201601750 ↗
34. 10.1021/am303004r10.1021/am303004r ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20160091010.1002/aenm.201600910 ↗
36. 10.1021/jp505151810.1021/jp5051518 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.07.00110.1016/j.orgel.2018.07.001 ↗
38. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b0134410.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01344 ↗
39. 10.1002/anie.20130936110.1002/anie.201309361 ↗
40. 10.1126/science.aad584510.1126/science.aad5845 ↗
41. 10.1038/nnano.2015.9010.1038/nnano.2015.90 ↗
42. 10.1039/c1ee02181h10.1039/c1ee02181h ↗
43. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.10.00110.1016/j.orgel.2015.10.001 ↗
44. 10.1039/C6EE02598F10.1039/C6EE02598F ↗
45. 10.1039/C6TA04344E10.1039/C6TA04344E ↗
46. 10.1039/C7TA01554B10.1039/C7TA01554B ↗