journal article·2015-06-24

Matching Solid-State to Solution-Phase Photoluminescence for Near-Unity Down-Conversion Efficiency Using Giant Quantum Dots

Christina J. Hanson, Matthew R. Buck, Krishna Acharya, Joseph A. Torres, Janardan Kundu, Xuedan Ma, Sarah Bouquin, Christopher E. Hamilton, Han Htoon, Jennifer A. Hollingsworth

Publisher page

Abstract

Efficient, stable, and narrowband red-emitting fluorophores are needed as down-conversion materials for next-generation solid-state lighting that is both efficient and of high color quality. Semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) are nearly ideal color-shifting phosphors, but solution-phase efficiencies have not traditionally extended to the solid-state, with losses from both intrinsic and environmental effects. Here, we assess the impacts of temperature and flux on QD phosphor performance. By controlling QD core/shell structure, we realize near-unity down-conversion efficiency and enhanced operational stability. Furthermore, we show that a simple modification of the phosphor-coated light-emitting diode device-incorporation of a thin spacer layer-can afford reduced thermal or photon-flux quenching at high driving currents (>200 mA).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Nanocluster Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Physics and Applications Division: Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies and ‡Materials Science and Technology Division: Polymers & Coatings, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, United States

Funding

Laboratory Directed Research and Development · Basic Energy Sciences

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. Navigant Consulting, Inc. · 2012
2. George N. C. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2013 · 43 · 48110.1146/annurev-matsci-073012-125702 ↗
3. Phillips J. M. · Laser Photonics Rev. · 2007 · 1 · 30710.1002/lpor.200710019 ↗
4. Wen D. · Dalton Trans. · 2013 · 42 · 1662110.1039/c3dt52214h ↗
5. Lin C. C. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2011 · 2 · 126810.1021/jz2002452 ↗
6. Shen C. · J. Mod. Opt. · 2012 · 59 · 119910.1080/09500340.2012.693632 ↗
7. Hu Y. · J. Rare Earths · 2014 · 32 · 1210.1016/S1002-0721(14)60027-2 ↗
8. Ziegler L. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 406810.1002/adma.200800724 ↗
9. Aboulaich A. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 6 · 25210.1021/am404108n ↗
10. Qu L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2002 · 124 · 204910.1021/ja017002j ↗
11. Greytak A. B. · Chem. Sci. · 2012 · 3 · 202810.1039/c2sc00561a ↗
12. Klar T. A. · Adv. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 76910.1002/adma.200401675 ↗
13. Kundu J. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 303110.1021/nl3008659 ↗
14. Mueller G. O. · 2005 · 11 · 1
15. Chen Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 502610.1021/ja711379k ↗
16. Ghosh Y. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2012 · 134 · 963410.1021/ja212032q ↗
17. Dennis A. M. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 554510.1021/nl302453x ↗
18. Lee J. · Adv. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 110210.1002/1521-4095(200008)12:15<1102::AID-ADMA1102>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
19. Park Y.-S. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2011 · 106 · 18740110.1103/PhysRevLett.106.187401 ↗
20. Pal B. N. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 33110.1021/nl203620f ↗
21. Meinardi F. · Nat. Photonics · 2014 · 8 · 39210.1038/nphoton.2014.54 ↗
22. Wood V. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 215110.1002/adma.200803256 ↗
23. Zhao Y. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 905810.1021/nn303217q ↗
24. Rowland C. E. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2013 · 117 · 1733710.1021/jp405616u ↗
25. Galland C. · Nature · 2011 · 479 · 20310.1038/nature10569 ↗
26. Qin W. · ACS Nano · 2012 · 6 · 912510.1021/nn303396c ↗
27. Caruge J.-M. · Phys. Rev. B · 2004 · 70 · 08531610.1103/PhysRevB.70.085316 ↗
28. Dang C. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2012 · 7 · 33510.1038/nnano.2012.61 ↗
29. Li L. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2009 · 1 · 249110.1021/am900451x ↗
30. Ioannou-Sougleridis V. · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2003 · 101 · 32410.1016/S0921-5107(02)00733-X ↗