journal article·2025-11-26Open access

Bidentate Pyridine Passivators Attaching Trifluoromethyl Substitute Groups in Varied Positions for Efficient Carbon-Based Perovskite Solar Cells

Mengqi Geng, Junke Jiang, Xinrui Ma, Jialiang Li, Ke Wang, Le Jiang, Dan Lu, Bin Li, Yu Gu, Tingting Xu

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 17· Issue 47

Abstract

Multifunctional passivation agents have been demonstrated to have an important effect on defect suppression and performance improvement in perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Rational molecular engineering of passivators can significantly boost passivation effects for achieving superior photovoltaic performance in PSCs. Thus, the relationship of passivators’ molecular structure–solar cell performance has great merit to be investigated. With this regard, a series of regioisomeric passivators (2-amino- n -(trifluoromethyl)pyridine, n -TFMAP ( n = 3, 4, 5, or 6)) were purposely chosen to surface passivate perovskite films. The trifluoromethyl (−CF 3 ) substitute group with good hydrophobic and electron-withdrawing characteristics is placed in different positions of the pyridine ring, and their passivation effect on carbon-based PSCs (C-PSCs) were systematically compared. It reveals that all n -TFMAP can passivate the uncoordinated Pb 2+ defects via bidentate coordination (pyridinic N and −NH 2 ), and the different positions of the −CF 3 group mainly changed the molecular electron density and the steric hindrance effect. The Lewis basicity (p K a value) was varied, and the binding energy and defect formation energy also correlate with the molecular structure when the passivators interact with the perovskite films. Among these passivators, 5-TFMAP showed the highest defect formation energy and moderate adsorption energy. 4-TFMAP exhibited exceptional humidity stability due to the sterically enabled vertical alignment of the −CF 3 . The trade-off between coordination strength (5-TFMAP) and interfacial coverage (4-TFMAP) highlighted the need for balanced molecular design. Consequently, 5-TFMAP with the strongest bidentate passivation and substantial hydrophobicity achieved the champion PCE of 14.14% compared with the control device (11.74%). After 30 days of storage in the dark with 35–45% relative humidity, the 5-TFMAP-passivated device retained 88% of their initial PCE, compared with control devices that retained only 63% of their initial PCE. This work suggests the necessity of precise site engineering to balance electronic properties, molecular geometry, and surface functionality, offering a valuable insight for designing high-performance passivators in PSCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering

Northwestern Polytechnical University

Materials Simulation and Modelling, Department of Applied Physics

Eindhoven University of Technology

Univ. Rennes, INSA Rennes, CNRS, Institut FOTON-UMR 6082

Frontiers Science Center for Flexible Electronics (FSCFE), Shaanxi Institute of Flexible Electronics (SIFE) & Shaanxi Institute of Biomedical Materials and Engineering (SIBME)

Northwestern Polytechnical University (NPU)

Shenzhen Research Institute of Northwestern Polytechnical University

Funding

Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
2. 10.1002/pip.391910.1002/pip.3919 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl400349b10.1021/nl400349b ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.04.00910.1016/j.nantod.2015.04.009 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.124316710.1126/science.1243167 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20160475810.1002/adma.201604758 ↗
7. 10.3390/molecules2909210410.3390/molecules29092104 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.aaa576010.1126/science.aaa5760 ↗
9. 10.1021/nn406020d10.1021/nn406020d ↗
10. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12555310.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125553 ↗
11. 10.1038/s41467-023-41853-y10.1038/s41467-023-41853-y ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20190042810.1002/adma.201900428 ↗
13. 10.1002/admi.20200011810.1002/admi.202000118 ↗
14. 10.1002/aenm.20190309010.1002/aenm.201903090 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20240985210.1002/adfm.202409852 ↗
16. 10.1002/smll.20200502210.1002/smll.202005022 ↗
17. 10.1002/advs.20241755010.1002/advs.202417550 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.03010.1016/j.solener.2021.01.030 ↗
19. 10.1002/cssc.20210157310.1002/cssc.202101573 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.aay969810.1126/science.aay9698 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20231192310.1002/adma.202311923 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20241510010.1002/adma.202415100 ↗
23. 10.1038/s41467-025-55815-z10.1038/s41467-025-55815-z ↗
24. 10.1021/acsami.1c0221810.1021/acsami.1c02218 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c0012310.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c00123 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2025.16164810.1016/j.cej.2025.161648 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15778410.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157784 ↗
28. 10.1088/0953-8984/14/11/30210.1088/0953-8984/14/11/302 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.16110410.1103/PhysRevB.81.161104 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.199310.1103/PhysRevB.43.1993 ↗
31. 10.1039/C6RA04656H10.1039/C6RA04656H ↗
32. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0005910.1021/acsenergylett.4c00059 ↗
33. 10.1038/s41560-019-0382-610.1038/s41560-019-0382-6 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jechem.2024.01.06310.1016/j.jechem.2024.01.063 ↗
35. 10.1002/adfm.20180756510.1002/adfm.201807565 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20230061010.1002/aenm.202300610 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0106010.1021/acsenergylett.1c01060 ↗
38. 10.1002/aenm.20230130210.1002/aenm.202301302 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.joule.2025.10200910.1016/j.joule.2025.102009 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10893710.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108937 ↗
41. 10.1002/adfm.20231659110.1002/adfm.202316591 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsenergylett.5c0079210.1021/acsenergylett.5c00792 ↗
43. 10.1002/smll.20230238310.1002/smll.202302383 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.00610.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.006 ↗
45. 10.1002/solr.20210071210.1002/solr.202100712 ↗