journal article·2018-12-12Open access

Decoupling Mesoscale Functional Response in PLZT across the Ferroelectric–Relaxor Phase Transition with Contact Kelvin Probe Force Microscopy and Machine Learning

Sabine M. Neumayer, Liam Collins, Rama Vasudevan, Christopher Smith, Suhas Somnath, Vladimir Ya. Shur, Stephen Jesse, Andrei L. Kholkin, Sergei V. Kalinin, Brian J. Rodriguez

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 49

Abstract

Relaxor ferroelectrics exhibit a range of interesting material behavior, including high electromechanical response, polarization rotations, as well as temperature and electric field-driven phase transitions. The origin of this unusual functional behavior remains elusive due to limited knowledge on polarization dynamics at the nanoscale. Piezoresponse force microscopy and associated switching spectroscopy provide access to local electromechanical properties on the micro- and nanoscale, which can help to address some of these gaps in our knowledge. However, these techniques are inherently prone to artefacts caused by signal contributions emanating from electrostatic interactions between tip and sample. Understanding functional behavior of complex, disordered systems like relaxor materials with unknown electromechanical properties therefore requires a technique that allows distinguishing between electromechanical and electrostatic response. Here, contact Kelvin probe force microscopy (cKPFM) is used to gain insight into the evolution of local electromechanical and capacitive properties of a representative relaxor material lead lanthanum zirconate across the phase transition from a ferroelectric to relaxor state. The obtained multidimensional data set was processed using an unsupervised machine learning algorithm to detect variations in functional response across the probed area and temperature range. Further analysis showed the formation of two separate cKPFM response bands below 50 °C, providing evidence for polarization switching. At higher temperatures only one band is observed, indicating an electrostatic origin of the measured response. In addition, the junction potential difference, which was extracted from the cKPFM data, becomes independent of the temperature in the relaxor state. The combination of this multidimensional voltage spectroscopy technique and machine learning allows to identify the origin of the measured functional response and to decouple ferroelectric from electrostatic phenomena necessary to understand the functional behavior of complex, disordered systems like relaxor materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1 Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States

School of Physics, University College Dublin, Belfield 4, Dublin 4, Ireland

School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Ural Federal University, 620000 Ekaterinburg, Russia

Department of Physics, CICECO—Aveiro Institute of Materials, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland · Russian Foundation of Basic Research

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.21210510.1103/PhysRevB.69.212105 ↗
2. 10.1088/0953-8984/15/9/20210.1088/0953-8984/15/9/202 ↗
3. 10.1088/0957-0233/8/1/00510.1088/0957-0233/8/1/005 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2013.05.13910.1016/j.ceramint.2013.05.139 ↗
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/21/2/02502110.1088/0964-1726/21/2/025021 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.492192510.1063/1.4921925 ↗
7. 10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/02503810.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025038 ↗
8. Sebald, G.; Guiffard, B.; Seveyrat, L.; Benayad, A.; Lebrun, L.; Pruvost, S.; Guyomar, D. In Electrocaloric Effect In Relaxor Ferroelectric Ceramics and Single Crystals; 15th IEEE International Symposium on the Applications of Ferroelectrics, 2006; pp 152–155.10.1109/ISAF.2006.4387864 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.492780310.1063/1.4927803 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.495357510.1063/1.4953575 ↗
11. 10.1002/adfm.20100258210.1002/adfm.201002582 ↗
12. 10.1142/S2010135X1241003210.1142/S2010135X12410032 ↗
13. 10.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-12163210.1146/annurev-matsci-071312-121632 ↗
14. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03240.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03240.x ↗
15. 10.1021/nn505176a10.1021/nn505176a ↗
16. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0222710.1021/acsnano.5b02227 ↗
17. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa537010.1088/1361-6528/aa5370 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.497901510.1063/1.4979015 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20150440710.1002/adfm.201504407 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0222710.1021/acsnano.5b02227 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.8b0951310.1021/acsami.8b09513 ↗
22. 10.1038/nphys410310.1038/nphys4103 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.7b1425710.1021/acsami.7b14257 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.503038110.1063/1.5030381 ↗
25. 10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-10360910.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103609 ↗
26. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa537010.1088/1361-6528/aa5370 ↗
27. Somnath, S.; Chris, R. S.; Nouamane, L.; Stephen, J. Pycroscopy, Computer software. Vers. 0.60.0, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, June 01, 2016, https://pycroscopy.github.io/pycroscopy/about.html.