Composition Homogeneity in InGaAs/GaAs Core–Shell Nanopillars Monolithically Grown on Silicon
Source abstract
Abstract
Alloy composition homogeneity plays an important role in the device performance of III-V heterostructures. In this work, we study the spatial composition uniformity of n-In0.12Ga0.88As/i-In0.2Ga0.8As/p-GaAs core-shell nanopillars monolithically grown on silicon. Cross sections extracted along the axial and radial directions are examined with transmission electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Interestingly, indium-deficient segments with width ∼5 nm are observed to develop along the radial ⟨112̅0⟩ directions in the InGaAs layers. We attribute this spontaneous ordering to capillarity effect and difference in group-III adatom diffusion lengths. The slight fluctuation in indium content (∼4%), however, does not induce any noticeable misfit defects in the pure wurtzite-phased crystal. In contrast, the heterostructure exhibits excellent alloy composition uniformity along the axial [0001] direction. Furthermore, abrupt transitions of gallium and indium are seen at the heterointerfaces. These remarkable properties give rise to extraordinary optical performances. Lasing is achieved in the core-shell nanopillars upon optical pump despite the observed alloy composition fluctuation in the radial directions. The results here reveal the potential of the InGaAs-based core-shell heterostructures as efficient optoelectronic devices and high-speed heterojunction transistors directly integrated on silicon.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, United States
Funding
U.S. Department of Defense · U.S. Department of Energy · National Science Foundation
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Munshi A. M. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 457010.1021/nl3018115 ↗
2. Lu F. · Opt. Express · 2012 · 20 · 1217110.1364/OE.20.012171 ↗
3. Dhaka V. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 191210.1021/nl204314z ↗
4. Ikejiri K. · Nanotechnology · 2013 · 24 · 11530410.1088/0957-4484/24/11/115304 ↗
5. Svensson C. P. T. · Nanotechnology · 2008 · 19 · 30520110.1088/0957-4484/19/30/305201 ↗
6. Li Y. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 146810.1021/nl060849z ↗
7. Krogstrup P. · Nat. Photonics · 2013 · 7 · 30610.1038/nphoton.2013.32 ↗
8. Dan Y. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 252710.1021/nl201179n ↗
9. Chang C. C. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 448410.1021/nl301391h ↗
10. Moewe M. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 2311610.1063/1.2949315 ↗
11. Ren F. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 01211510.1063/1.4775377 ↗
12. Ng K. W. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 10010.1021/nn3028166 ↗
13. Chen R. · Nat. Photonics · 2011 · 5 · 17010.1038/nphoton.2010.315 ↗
14. Nazarenko M. V. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 113 · 10431110.1063/1.4795168 ↗
15. Chen R. · Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 432510.1038/ncomms5325 ↗
16. Ng K. W. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 1 · 1
17. Chuang L. C. · Nano Lett. · 2011 · 11 · 38510.1021/nl102988w ↗
18. Yamashita T. · Surf. Sci. · 2013 · 609 · 20710.1016/j.susc.2012.12.009 ↗
19. Biasiol G. · Phys. Rev. B · 2002 · 65 · 110.1103/PhysRevB.65.205306 ↗
20. Wagner J. B. · J. Cryst. Growth · 2010 · 312 · 175510.1016/j.jcrysgro.2010.02.009 ↗
21. Kim Y. · Nano Lett. · 2006 · 6 · 59910.1021/nl052189o ↗
22. Fickenscher M. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 101610.1021/nl304182j ↗
23. Rudolph D. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 152210.1021/nl3046816 ↗
24. Pennycook S. J. · Ultramicroscopy · 1989 · 30 · 5810.1016/0304-3991(89)90173-3 ↗
25. Ng K. W. · Nano Lett. · 2013 · 13 · 593110.1021/nl403555z ↗
26. Bourgoin J. C. · Solid State Phenom. · 1991 · 10