The Effect of Oxygen Uptake on Charge Injection Barriers in Conjugated Polymer Films
Source abstract
Abstract
The energy offset between the electrode Fermi level and organic semiconductor transport levels is a key parameter controlling the charge injection barrier and hence efficiency of organic electronic devices. Here, we systematically explore the effect of in situ oxygen exposure on energetics in n-type conjugated polymer P(NDI2OD-T2) films. The analysis reveals that an interfacial potential step is introduced for a series of P(NDI2OD-T2) electrode contacts, causing a nearly constant downshift of the vacuum level, while the ionization energies versus vacuum level remain constant. These findings are attributed to the establishment of a so-called double-dipole step via motion of charged molecules and will modify the charge injection barriers at electrode contact. We further demonstrate that the same behavior occurs when oxygen interacts with p-type polymer TQ1 films, indicating it is possible to be a universal effect for organic semiconductors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Polar Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, East China Normal University, 200241 Shanghai, P.R. China
Division of Surface Physics and Chemistry, IFM, Linköping University, SE-58183 Linköping, Sweden
Funding
East China Normal University · Vetenskapsr?det · G?ran Gustafssons Stiftelse f?r Naturvetenskaplig och Medicinsk Forskning · Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China · Stiftelsen f?r?Strategisk Forskning · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Sveriges Regering
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nature2010210.1038/nature20102 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.290.5499.212310.1126/science.290.5499.2123 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20130466610.1002/adma.201304666 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20080215510.1002/adma.200802155 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20080128310.1002/adma.200801283 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20160415510.1002/adma.201604155 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20080289310.1002/adma.200802893 ↗
8. 10.1039/c1jm12515j10.1039/c1jm12515j ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20120163010.1002/adma.201201630 ↗
10. 10.1021/ja204011j10.1021/ja204011j ↗
11. 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.07.04810.1016/j.orgel.2012.07.048 ↗
12. 10.1021/jp400464210.1021/jp4004642 ↗
13. 10.1038/nmat338410.1038/nmat3384 ↗
14. 10.1021/jp203273710.1021/jp2032737 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.471180610.1063/1.4711806 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20090113610.1002/adma.200901136 ↗
17. 10.1038/nature0772710.1038/nature07727 ↗
18. 10.1039/C6TA00531D10.1039/C6TA00531D ↗
19. 10.1021/ja304198e10.1021/ja304198e ↗
20. 10.1088/0953-8984/19/18/18320210.1088/0953-8984/19/18/183202 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20140151310.1002/adfm.201401513 ↗
22. 10.1038/nmat315910.1038/nmat3159 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20120141210.1002/adfm.201201412 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.elspec.2013.02.00110.1016/j.elspec.2013.02.001 ↗
25. 10.1002/aenm.20130127210.1002/aenm.201301272 ↗
26. 10.1002/admi.20140040310.1002/admi.201400403 ↗
27. 10.1002/admi.20150020410.1002/admi.201500204 ↗
28. 10.1002/admi.20140018910.1002/admi.201400189 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.26760210.1103/PhysRevLett.110.267602 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20160690110.1002/adma.201606901 ↗