Geometrical Structure and Interface Dependence of Bias Stress Induced Threshold Voltage Shift in C60-Based OFETs
Source abstract
Abstract
The influence of the nature of interface between organic semiconductor and gate dielectric on bias stress electrical stability of n-type C60-based organic field effect transistors (OFETs) was studied. The bias stress induced threshold voltage (Vth) shift was found to depend critically on the OFET device structure: the direction of V(th) shift in top-gate OFETs was opposite to that in bottom-gate OFETs, while the use of the dual-gate OFET structure resulted in just very small variations in V(th). The opposite direction of Vth shift is attributed to the different nature of interfaces between C60 semiconductor and Parylene dielectric in these devices. The V(th) shift to more positive voltages upon bias stress in bottom-gate C60-OFET was similar to that observed for other n-type semiconductors and rationalized by electron trapping in the dielectric or at the gate dielectric/C60 interface. The opposite direction of Vth shift in top-gate C60-OFETs is attributed to free radical species created in the course of Parylene deposition on the surface of C60 during device fabrication, which produce plenty of hole traps. It was also realized that the dual-gate OFETs gives stable characteristics, which are immune to bias stress effects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Semiconductor and Solid State Physics, Johannes Kepler University, A-4040 Linz, Austria
National Center for Physics, Quaid-e-Azam University Campus, Islamabad, Pakistan
Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 03028 Kyiv, Ukraine
IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Funding
European Research Council · Austrian Science Fund · National Academy of Sciences, Ukraine
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Stutzmann N. S. · Nat. Mater. · 2005 · 4 · 60110.1038/nmat1426 ↗
2. Nigam A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 101 · 08330510.1063/1.4747451 ↗
3. Nigam A. · MRS Symp. Proc. · 2013 · 1501 · 0510.1557/opl.2013.121 ↗
4. Zhou L. S. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 08350210.1063/1.2178213 ↗
5. Liu X. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2014 · 6 · 833710.1021/am501197d ↗
6. Rotzoll R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2006 · 88 · 12350210.1063/1.2186384 ↗
7. Crone B. K. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 91 · 1014010.1063/1.1476084 ↗
8. Torsi L. · Org. Electron. · 2009 · 10 · 23310.1016/j.orgel.2008.11.009 ↗
9. Osedach T. P. · ACS Nano · 2011 · 6 · 312110.1021/nn3008788 ↗
10. Fomani A. A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 08452110.1063/1.3569702 ↗
11. Salleo A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2003 · 94 · 47110.1063/1.1581352 ↗
12. Sirringhaus H. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 39 · 385910.1002/adma.200901136 ↗
13. Tello M. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2008 · 18 · 390710.1002/adfm.200800009 ↗
14. Mathijssen S. G. J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 19210410.1063/1.2737419 ↗
15. Yogev S. · Org. Electron. · 2010 · 11 · 172910.1016/j.orgel.2010.07.021 ↗
16. Puntambekar K. P. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 83 · 553910.1063/1.1637443 ↗
17. Ng T. N. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 08450510.1063/1.2358410 ↗
18. Mathijssen S. G. J. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 97510.1002/adma.200702688 ↗
19. Katz H. E. · J. Mater. Res. · 2004 · 19 · 199510.1557/JMR.2004.0254 ↗
20. Klauk H. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2002 · 92 · 525910.1063/1.1511826 ↗
21. Dong H. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 14 · 1416510.1039/c2cp41712j ↗
22. Nie G. · Org. Electron. · 2011 · 12 · 42910.1016/j.orgel.2010.12.012 ↗
23. Miyadera T. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 03330410.1063/1.2949746 ↗
24. Suemori K. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 19211210.1063/1.2812573 ↗
25. Diallo K. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 91 · 18350810.1063/1.2802039 ↗
26. Hwang D. K. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 129310.1002/adma.201004278 ↗
27. Veres J. · Chem. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 454310.1021/cm049598q ↗
28. Schwabegger G. · Synth. Met. · 2011 · 161 · 205810.1016/j.synthmet.2011.06.042 ↗
29. Ahmed R. · Synth. Met. · 2012 · 161 · 256210.1016/j.synthmet.2011.08.008 ↗
30. Maddalena F. · Org. Electron. · 2008 · 9 · 83910.1016/j.orgel.2008.06.004 ↗
31. Islam A. E. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 17350410.1063/1.2919798 ↗
32. Young N. D. · Sci. Technol. · 1992 · 7 · 1103
33. Zilker S. J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2001 · 79 · 112410.1063/1.1394718 ↗
34. Ahmed R. · Org. Electron. · 2014 · 15 · 17510.1016/j.orgel.2013.11.002 ↗
35. Spijkman M.-J. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 323110.1002/adma.201101493 ↗
36. Debucquoy M. · Org. Electron. · 2009 · 10 · 125210.1016/j.orgel.2009.07.005 ↗
37. Loy D. A. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1992 · 114 · 397710.1021/ja00036a055 ↗
38. Mityashin A. · Adv. Mater. · 2012 · 24 · 153510.1002/adma.201104269 ↗
39. Lussem B. · Phys. Status Solidi A · 2013 · 210 · 910.1002/pssa.201228310 ↗
40. Chua L. L. · Nature · 2005 · 434 · 19410.1038/nature03376 ↗
41. Pope M. · 199910.1093/oso/9780195129632.001.0001 ↗