journal article·2024-11-06Open access

Operation of Amorphous TiO 2 -Protected Photocathodes Described with the Maxwell Equivalent Circuit

Erin Service, Thomas Moehl, S. David Tilley

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 44

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The use of amorphous TiO 2 (a-TiO 2 ), deposited by atomic layer deposition, is a common strategy to protect semiconductors from degradation when used in water-splitting photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) is a suitable technique to study these PEC cells because it is capable of deconvoluting multiple processes occurring during operation, therefore providing information about mechanisms leading to the overall device performance. When biased under hydrogen evolution conditions, EIS shows that two simultaneous processes occur in a-TiO 2 -protected photocathodes, which introduces an ambiguity in choosing the correct equivalent circuit to describe the operating device. In this report, a model p-Si|a-TiO 2 |Pt photocathode system is used to show that the Maxwell circuit best describes the operating mechanism, as opposed to the more commonly used Voight and nested circuits. This indicates that, under hydrogen evolution conditions, both faradaic and nonfaradaic processes are occurring. Whereas the faradaic process corresponds to the hydrogen evolution reaction itself, the nonfaradaic process is traced to the p-Si|a-TiO 2 interface.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques · Iron oxide chemistry and applications · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry

University of Zurich

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur F?rderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · Universit?t Z?rich

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c2ee22063f10.1039/c2ee22063f ↗
2. 10.1126/science.125142810.1126/science.1251428 ↗
3. 10.1039/C9SE00248K10.1039/C9SE00248K ↗
4. 10.1002/aenm.20200356910.1002/aenm.202003569 ↗
5. 10.1002/aenm.20220312210.1002/aenm.202203122 ↗
6. 10.1063/1.200114610.1063/1.2001146 ↗
7. 10.1063/5.012354710.1063/5.0123547 ↗
8. 10.1002/cphc.20210017710.1002/cphc.202100177 ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c0859510.1021/acs.jpcc.1c08595 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsmeasuresciau.2c0007010.1021/acsmeasuresciau.2c00070 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0089210.1021/acs.jpcc.9b00892 ↗
12. 10.1039/C8SC01453A10.1039/C8SC01453A ↗
13. Barsoukov E. · 2005 · 2710.1002/0471716243 ↗
14. 10.1016/0013-4686(88)85024-210.1016/0013-4686(88)85024-2 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.03.18810.1016/j.electacta.2018.03.188 ↗
16. 10.1021/j100201a00710.1021/j100201a007 ↗
17. 10.1039/C8CS00997J10.1039/C8CS00997J ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.accounts.1c0007210.1021/acs.accounts.1c00072 ↗
19. 10.1038/s41467-020-14704-310.1038/s41467-020-14704-3 ↗
20. 10.1039/D1EE03696C10.1039/D1EE03696C ↗
21. 10.1021/am500948t10.1021/am500948t ↗
22. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.10026110.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100261 ↗
23. 10.1039/C3CS60370A10.1039/C3CS60370A ↗
24. 10.1039/c2ee00001f10.1039/c2ee00001f ↗
25. 10.1039/C4CP04209C10.1039/C4CP04209C ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20220131410.1002/aenm.202201314 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0443410.1021/acs.jpcc.9b04434 ↗
28. 10.1002/celc.20170049810.1002/celc.201700498 ↗
29. 10.1021/ja210755h10.1021/ja210755h ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b0219310.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02193 ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c0021410.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00214 ↗
32. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0378210.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03782 ↗
33. Neaman D. A. · 2012
34. 10.1039/b812468j10.1039/b812468j ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0362110.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03621 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.7b1256410.1021/acsami.7b12564 ↗