Active Discovery of Donor:Acceptor Combinations For Efficient Organic Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
The structural flexibility of organic semiconductors offers vast a search space, and many potential candidates (donor and acceptor) for organic solar cells (OSCs) are yet to be discovered. Machine learning is extensively used for material discovery but performs poorly on extrapolation tasks with small training data sets. Active learning techniques can guide experimentalists to extrapolate and find the most promising D:A combination in a significantly small number of experiments. This study uses an active learning technique with a predictive random forest model to iteratively find the most optimal D:A combinations in the search space using various acquisition functions. Active learning results with five different acquisition functions (MM, MEI, MLI, MU, and UCB) are compared. Results reveal that acquisition functions that combine exploitation and exploration (MEI, MLI, and UCB) perform far better than purely exploiting (MM) and purely exploring (MU) acquisition functions. Interestingly, the proposed model can overcome the bottleneck of extrapolating small training data sets and find most promising D:A combinations in relatively fewer experiments.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Physics, The LNM Institute of Information Technology, Jamdoli, Jaipur302031, Rajasthan, India
School of Materials Engineering and Birck Nanotechnology Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana47907, United States
Department of Electronics Engineering and Communication, The LNM Institute of Information Technology, Jamdoli, Jaipur302031, Rajasthan, India
References (70)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/aenm.20210252610.1002/aenm.202102526 ↗
2. 10.1002/aenm.20200344110.1002/aenm.202003441 ↗
3. 10.1002/advs.20190325910.1002/advs.201903259 ↗
4. 10.1063/5.002794810.1063/5.0027948 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20200162110.1002/adma.202001621 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matre.2021.10006210.1016/j.matre.2021.100062 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41560-021-00820-x10.1038/s41560-021-00820-x ↗
8. 10.1016/j.scib.2020.01.00110.1016/j.scib.2020.01.001 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20210242010.1002/adma.202102420 ↗
10. 10.1002/advs.20210534710.1002/advs.202105347 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat506310.1038/nmat5063 ↗
12. 10.1039/C7CS00892A10.1039/C7CS00892A ↗
13. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.00410.1016/j.joule.2019.01.004 ↗
14. 10.1002/solr.20190034210.1002/solr.201900342 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevX.8.03105510.1103/PhysRevX.8.031055 ↗
16. 10.1039/D0EE02838J10.1039/D0EE02838J ↗
17. 10.1039/D1EE00559F10.1039/D1EE00559F ↗
18. 10.1039/D2EE00887D10.1039/D2EE00887D ↗
19. 10.1039/c1ee02056k10.1039/c1ee02056k ↗
20. 10.1002/aenm.20180103210.1002/aenm.201801032 ↗
21. 10.1002/ente.20190097410.1002/ente.201900974 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41524-020-00429-w10.1038/s41524-020-00429-w ↗
23. 10.1016/j.orgel.2019.10546510.1016/j.orgel.2019.105465 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0232510.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02325 ↗
25. 10.1002/adfm.20201116810.1002/adfm.202011168 ↗
26. 10.1002/advs.20210474210.1002/advs.202104742 ↗
27. 10.1039/D1TA09762H10.1039/D1TA09762H ↗
28. 10.1016/j.patter.2021.10033310.1016/j.patter.2021.100333 ↗
29. 10.1126/sciadv.aay427510.1126/sciadv.aay4275 ↗
30. 10.1021/acs.jcim.9b0073210.1021/acs.jcim.9b00732 ↗
31. 10.1155/2019/453851410.1155/2019/4538514 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20190246310.1002/aenm.201902463 ↗
33. 10.1039/C8MH01135D10.1039/C8MH01135D ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20190089110.1002/aenm.201900891 ↗
35. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0277210.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02772 ↗
36. 10.1038/s41524-020-00388-210.1038/s41524-020-00388-2 ↗
37. 10.1002/aisy.20190010810.1002/aisy.201900108 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.09.05610.1016/j.solener.2021.09.056 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.10.00610.1016/j.joule.2017.10.006 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11056110.1016/j.matdes.2022.110561 ↗
41. 10.1039/C7CS00892A10.1039/C7CS00892A ↗
42. 10.1039/D1EE00559F10.1039/D1EE00559F ↗
43. 10.1002/adts.20180011610.1002/adts.201800116 ↗
44. 10.1039/D2DD00004K10.1039/D2DD00004K ↗
45. 10.1021/acscentsci.7b0057210.1021/acscentsci.7b00572 ↗
46. 10.1038/srep1966010.1038/srep19660 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2022.11138610.1016/j.commatsci.2022.111386 ↗
48. 10.1007/s40192-017-0098-z10.1007/s40192-017-0098-z ↗
49. 10.1007/s40192-021-00214-710.1007/s40192-021-00214-7 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c0076810.1021/acs.chemmater.0c00768 ↗
51. 10.3389/fchem.2021.80037110.3389/fchem.2021.800371 ↗
52. 10.1002/adma.20190780110.1002/adma.201907801 ↗
53. 10.1038/s41467-021-22611-410.1038/s41467-021-22611-4 ↗
54. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0255410.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02554 ↗
55. 10.1039/C9TA04097H10.1039/C9TA04097H ↗
56. 10.1016/j.isci.2019.08.03810.1016/j.isci.2019.08.038 ↗
57. 10.1021/acsami.0c1357910.1021/acsami.0c13579 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.02010.1016/j.joule.2017.09.020 ↗
59. 10.1002/aenm.20100002710.1002/aenm.201000027 ↗
60. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0180810.1021/acsenergylett.8b01808 ↗
61. 10.1039/C9TA07361B10.1039/C9TA07361B ↗
62. 10.1186/s13321-015-0109-z10.1186/s13321-015-0109-z ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c0352610.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03526 ↗
64. 10.1021/ci00057a00510.1021/ci00057a005 ↗
65. Getting Started with the RDKit in Python - The RDKit 2021.09.1 documentation. https://www.rdkit.org/docs/GettingStartedInPython.html#list-of-available-descriptors (accessed 2022–03–02).
66. 10.1023/A:100830643114710.1023/A:1008306431147 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jspi.2010.04.01810.1016/j.jspi.2010.04.018 ↗
68. Brochu, E.; Cora, V. M.; de Freitas, N.A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimization of Expensive Cost Functions, with Application to Active User Modeling and Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning. arXiv (Machine Learning), Dec. 12, 2010, arXiv:1012.2599, version 1, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1012.2599.
69. 10.1021/ci100050t10.1021/ci100050t ↗
70. 10.1186/s13321-018-0258-y10.1186/s13321-018-0258-y ↗