Transient Measurements and Simulations Correlate Exchange Ligand Concentration and Trap States in Colloidal Quantum Dot Photodetectors
Source abstract
Abstract
Colloidal quantum dot (CQD) photodetectors (PDs) can detect wavelengths longer than the 1100 nm limit of silicon because of their highly tunable bandgaps. CQD PDs are acutely affected by the ligands that separate adjacent dots in a CQD-solid. Optimizing the exchange solution ligand concentration in the processing steps is crucial to achieving high photodetector performance. However, the complex mix of chemistry and optoelectronics involved in CQD PDs means that the effects of the exchange solution ligand concentration on device physics are poorly understood. Here we report direct correspondence between simulated and experimental transient photocurrent responses in CQD PDs. For both deficient and excess conditions, our model demonstrated the experimental changes to the transient photocurrent aligned with changes in trap state density. Combining transient photoluminescence, absorption, and photocurrent with this simulation model, we revealed that different mechanisms are responsible for the increased trap density induced by excess and deficient active layer ligand concentrations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Edward S. Rogers Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3G4, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1117/12.77777610.1117/12.777776 ↗
2. 10.1117/12.81878210.1117/12.818782 ↗
3. 10.1126/science.aac552310.1126/science.aac5523 ↗
4. 10.1038/nnano.2012.12710.1038/nnano.2012.127 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20190430410.1002/adma.201904304 ↗
6. 10.1038/nenergy.2016.3510.1038/nenergy.2016.35 ↗
7. 10.1039/C4NR07006B10.1039/C4NR07006B ↗
8. 10.1021/cm501595u10.1021/cm501595u ↗
9. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c0049110.1021/acs.nanolett.3c00491 ↗
10. 10.1021/ja400948t10.1021/ja400948t ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0195710.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01957 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0184310.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01843 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0214710.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02147 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0013210.1021/acsnano.8b00132 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41565-018-0312-y10.1038/s41565-018-0312-y ↗
16. 10.1021/jacs.8b0778310.1021/jacs.8b07783 ↗
17. 10.1021/nn302910610.1021/nn3029106 ↗
18. 10.1021/nl050267210.1021/nl0502672 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.15530210.1103/PhysRevB.83.155302 ↗
20. 10.1126/science.287.5455.101110.1126/science.287.5455.1011 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20220688410.1002/adma.202206884 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20220032110.1002/adma.202200321 ↗
23. 10.1002/adom.20190156810.1002/adom.201901568 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20160524210.1002/adma.201605242 ↗
25. 10.1002/adom.20210161110.1002/adom.202101611 ↗
26. 10.1002/adfm.20221015810.1002/adfm.202210158 ↗
27. 10.1021/nn800471c10.1021/nn800471c ↗
28. 10.1038/nmat311810.1038/nmat3118 ↗
29. 10.1038/srep0132410.1038/srep01324 ↗
30. 10.1007/s40820-020-0371-010.1007/s40820-020-0371-0 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.matt.2020.12.01710.1016/j.matt.2020.12.017 ↗
32. 10.1021/nn402198310.1021/nn4021983 ↗
33. 10.1002/adma.20030539510.1002/adma.200305395 ↗