Charge-Transfer Complexes in Organic Field-Effect Transistors: Superior Suitability for Surface Doping
Source abstract
Abstract
We demonstrate the key role of charge-transfer complexes in surface doping as a successful methodology for improving channel field-effect mobility and reducing the threshold voltage in organic field-effect transistors (OFETs), as well as raising the film conductivity. Demonstrated here for 2,7-dioctyl[1]benzothieno[3,2-b][1]benzothiophene (C8-BTBT) doped with 2,2′-(perfluoronaphthalene-2,6-diylidene)dimalononitrile (F6TCNNQ), channel doping by sequential deposition is consistently rationalized by the development of a cocrystalline structure that forms and evolves from the surface of the organic semiconductor film without trading the thin-film structure integrity. This scenario brings higher benefits for the device operation than doping by codeposition, where a decrease in the field-effect mobility of the device, even for a dopant content of only 1 mol %, makes codeposition less suitable. Insight into the structural and electronic properties of the interface satisfactorily explains the improved performance of OFETs upon the incorporation of the dopant and provides an understanding of the mechanism of doping in this system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona (ICMAB), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona 08193, Spain
NCD-SWEET beamline, ALBA Synchrotron Light Source, C/ de la Llum 2-26. Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona 08290, Spain
Dresden Integrated Center for Applied Physics and Photonic Materials (IAPP), Dresden 01062, Germany
Funding
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci?n
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.477255110.1063/1.4772551 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.05.03610.1016/j.orgel.2013.05.036 ↗
3. 10.1021/acsami.0c0641810.1021/acsami.0c06418 ↗
4. 10.1002/adma.20100186510.1002/adma.201001865 ↗
5. 10.1038/ncomms377510.1038/ncomms3775 ↗
6. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0032910.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00329 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.09.02710.1016/j.orgel.2011.09.027 ↗
8. 10.1088/1361-6463/aa4e9510.1088/1361-6463/aa4e95 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.494364610.1063/1.4943646 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.369094910.1063/1.3690949 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsami.2c0297710.1021/acsami.2c02977 ↗
12. 10.1039/d0cp00487a10.1039/d0cp00487a ↗
13. 10.7567/APEX.9.11160110.7567/APEX.9.111601 ↗
14. 10.1002/smll.20100225410.1002/smll.201002254 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.473721410.1063/1.4737214 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.349142910.1063/1.3491429 ↗
17. 10.1039/d0cp00487a10.1039/d0cp00487a ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.0c2222410.1021/acsami.0c22224 ↗
19. 10.1126/sciadv.abl926410.1126/sciadv.abl9264 ↗
20. 10.1038/ncomms956010.1038/ncomms9560 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20170041110.1002/adma.201700411 ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0144710.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01447 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.03550210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.035502 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0043810.1021/acs.accounts.5b00438 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20130239610.1002/anie.201302396 ↗
26. 10.1039/d1ma00578b10.1039/d1ma00578b ↗
27. 10.1016/j.elspec.2015.05.00110.1016/j.elspec.2015.05.001 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.243241010.1063/1.2432410 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41467-018-03302-z10.1038/s41467-018-03302-z ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.03532010.1103/PhysRevB.86.035320 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.12.00210.1016/j.orgel.2018.12.002 ↗
32. 10.1021/am501531510.1021/am5015315 ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20190485810.1002/adfm.201904858 ↗
34. 10.1002/aelm.20170009710.1002/aelm.201700097 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.491828810.1063/1.4918288 ↗
36. 10.1039/c9cp02939g10.1039/c9cp02939g ↗
37. 10.1039/d0tc02828b10.1039/d0tc02828b ↗
38. 10.1063/1.476934510.1063/1.4769345 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2009.06.00210.1016/j.progsurf.2009.06.002 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0374410.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03744 ↗