Enhancing Performance and Stability of p-i-n Perovskite Solar Cells with Ag–Cu Codeposited Alloy Electrodes
Source abstract
Abstract
In the development of back electrodes for perovskite solar cells (PSCs), the major challenges are stability and cost. To address this, we present an innovative approach: Simultaneous evaporation of two independently controlled sources of metal materials was performed to achieve a uniform distribution of the alloy electrodes. In this study, Ag-Cu alloys (the molar ratio of Ag/Cu is 7/3) with a high-index crystal face (111) and a work function matching perovskite were prepared using a codeposition technique. These properties mitigate nonradiative carrier recombination at the interface and reduce the energy barrier for carrier migration. Consequently, compared to Ag based PSCs (22.77%), the implementation of Ag-Cu alloy (Ag/Cu is 7/3)-based PSCs resulted in a power conversion efficiency of 23.72%. In a 1500 h tracking test in ambient air, the Ag-Cu alloy (Ag/Cu is 7/3)-based PSCs maintained their initial efficiency of 86%. This can be attributed to almost no migration of elements from the Ag-Cu alloy electrode to the perovskite layer. Our work presents a vital strategy for improving the stability of PSCs and reducing the costs associated with the back electrode in PSCs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Metallurgical and Energy Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
Kunming Gaoju Technology Co., Ltd, Kunming 650106, China
Yunnan University Secondary School, Xingyao Campus, Kunming 650213, China
Funding
Major Science and Technology Projects in Yunnan Province · Yunnan Fundamental Research Projects
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/d41586-023-03714-y10.1038/d41586-023-03714-y ↗
2. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0412010.1021/acsaem.2c04120 ↗
3. 10.1038/s41427-023-00474-z10.1038/s41427-023-00474-z ↗
4. Interactive best research-cell efficiency chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/interactive-cell-efficiency.html (accessed 2024–01–23).
5. 10.1002/advs.20230611010.1002/advs.202306110 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c0005910.1021/acsenergylett.4c00059 ↗
7. 10.1039/D3EE00413A10.1039/D3EE00413A ↗
8. 10.1039/C9TA08314F10.1039/C9TA08314F ↗
9. 10.1002/adfm.20231217510.1002/adfm.202312175 ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20230255210.1002/adma.202302552 ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20180647810.1002/adma.201806478 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20230039610.1002/adfm.202300396 ↗
13. 10.1002/admi.20150019510.1002/admi.201500195 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0261310.1021/acsnano.6b02613 ↗
15. 10.1038/s41560-022-01038-110.1038/s41560-022-01038-1 ↗
16. 10.1039/C8TA09433K10.1039/C8TA09433K ↗
17. 10.1002/adfm.20220065110.1002/adfm.202200651 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.02610.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.026 ↗
19. 10.1039/C5RA06133D10.1039/C5RA06133D ↗
20. 10.1002/adfm.20220929010.1002/adfm.202209290 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16145510.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161455 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ensm.2016.11.00710.1016/j.ensm.2016.11.007 ↗
23. 10.1002/adfm.20180298510.1002/adfm.201802985 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.02510.1016/j.jmst.2018.12.025 ↗
25. 10.1126/sciadv.abd158010.1126/sciadv.abd1580 ↗
26. 10.1002/aenm.20210276610.1002/aenm.202102766 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.2c0106110.1021/acsami.2c01061 ↗
28. 10.1039/C6EE02980A10.1039/C6EE02980A ↗
29. 10.1002/ente.20220147510.1002/ente.202201475 ↗
30. 10.1039/D2TC02182J10.1039/D2TC02182J ↗
31. 10.1039/D0TA01606C10.1039/D0TA01606C ↗
32. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0199310.1021/acsaem.1c01993 ↗
33. 10.1007/s40820-022-00985-410.1007/s40820-022-00985-4 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.89110.1103/PhysRevLett.80.891 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗