Modeling of Diffusion and Incorporation of Interstitial Oxygen Ions at the TiN/SiO2 Interface
Source abstract
Abstract
Silica-based resistive random access memory devices have become an active research area due to complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor compatibility and recent dramatic increases in their performance and endurance. In spite of both experimental and theoretical insights gained into the electroforming process, many atomistic aspects of the set and reset operation of these devices are still poorly understood. Recently a mechanism of electroforming process based on the formation of neutral oxygen vacancies (VO0) and interstitial O ions (Oi2–) facilitated by electron injection into the oxide has been proposed. In this work, we extend the description of the bulk (Oi2–) migration to the interface of amorphous SiO2 with the polycrystaline TiN electrode, using density functional theory simulations. The results demonstrate a strong kinetic and thermodynamic drive for the movement of Oi2– to the interface, with dramatically reduced incorporation energies and migration barriers close to the interface. The arrival of Oi2– at the interface is accompanied by preferential oxidation of undercoordinated Ti sites at the interface, forming a Ti–O layer. We investigate how O ions incorporate into a perfect and defective ∑5(012)[100] grain boundary (GB) in TiN oriented perpendicular to the interface. Our simulations demonstrate the preferential incorporation of Oi at defects within the TiN GB and their fast diffusion along a passivated grain boundary. They explain how, as a result of electroforming, the system undergoes very significant structural changes with the oxide being significantly reduced, interface being oxidized, and part of the oxygen leaving the system.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
LITEN, CEA-Grenoble, 17 rue des Martyrs, 38054 Grenoble Cedex 9, France
Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Singapore 138634, Singapore
Materials Center Leoben Forschung GmbH (MCL), Roseggerstraße 12, A-8700 Leoben, Austria
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council · Leverhulme Trust · ?sterreichische Forschungsf?rderungsgesellschaft
References (81)
Show source-provided references
1. Waser, R., Ielmini, D., Eds. Resistive Switching: From Fundamentals of Nanoionic Redox Processes to Memristive Device Applications; Wiley, 2016; pp 1–729.10.1002/9783527680870.ch1 ↗
2. 10.1002/aelm.20180014310.1002/aelm.201800143 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat202310.1038/nmat2023 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.485841710.1063/1.4858417 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20167024110.1002/adma.201670241 ↗
6. 10.1088/1361-648X/aa6f9a10.1088/1361-648X/aa6f9a ↗
7. 10.1038/asiamat.2010.510.1038/asiamat.2010.5 ↗
8. 10.1155/2014/57816810.1155/2014/578168 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.497745310.1063/1.4977453 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.367156510.1063/1.3671565 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10853-012-6568-y10.1007/s10853-012-6568-y ↗
12. 10.1016/j.mee.2015.04.06510.1016/j.mee.2015.04.065 ↗
13. 10.1039/c3ta14816e10.1039/c3ta14816e ↗
14. 10.1002/jcc.2427210.1002/jcc.24272 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsami.5b0182510.1021/acsami.5b01825 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.360147310.1063/1.3601473 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.370158110.1063/1.3701581 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.489124210.1063/1.4891242 ↗
19. 10.7567/JJAP.54.02180210.7567/JJAP.54.021802 ↗
20. 10.1186/1556-276X-8-15610.1186/1556-276X-8-156 ↗
21. 10.1186/1556-276X-9-59210.1186/1556-276X-9-592 ↗
22. 10.1002/pssa.20160059510.1002/pssa.201600595 ↗
23. 10.1149/1.363306310.1149/1.3633063 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.microrel.2019.05.00510.1016/j.microrel.2019.05.005 ↗
25. Patel, K.; Cottom, J.; Bosman, M.; Kenyon, A. J.; Shluger, A. L. In Theoretical Study of Ag Interactions in Amorphous Silica RRAM Devices, Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits, IPFA; 2018; pp 1–5.10.1109/IPFA.2018.8452536 ↗
26. 10.1088/1367-2630/14/11/11302910.1088/1367-2630/14/11/113029 ↗
27. 10.1109/TNANO.2018.286790410.1109/TNANO.2018.2867904 ↗
28. Abbaspour, E.; Menzel, S.; Jungemann, C. In KMC Simulation of the Electroforming, Set and Reset Processes in Redox-Based Resistive Switching Devices, 2016 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD), 2016; pp 141–144.10.1109/SISPAD.2016.7605167 ↗
29. Marchewka, A.; Waser, R.; Menzel, S. In Physical Modeling of the Electroforming Process in Resistive-Switching Devices, 2017 International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices (SISPAD), 2017; pp 133–136.10.23919/SISPAD.2017.8085282 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.mee.2017.04.03310.1016/j.mee.2017.04.033 ↗
31. 10.1038/s41598-017-09565-810.1038/s41598-017-09565-8 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.11550310.1103/PhysRevLett.114.115503 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.mee.2013.03.02710.1016/j.mee.2013.03.027 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.12520110.1103/PhysRevB.89.125201 ↗
35. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/50/50520710.1088/0957-4484/27/50/505207 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.06410210.1103/PhysRevB.98.064102 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.mee.2013.03.13210.1016/j.mee.2013.03.132 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.11810.1016/j.apsusc.2010.10.118 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.00910.1016/j.tsf.2015.02.009 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.233910.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2339 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.08520210.1103/PhysRevB.80.085202 ↗
42. 10.1063/1.132967210.1063/1.1329672 ↗
43. 10.1080/0141861980822376410.1080/01418619808223764 ↗
44. 10.1080/0141861970821028910.1080/01418619708210289 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.00510.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.005 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.10430310.1103/PhysRevB.94.104303 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.47.55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
48. 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.1425110.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
49. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
51. 10.1002/wcms.115910.1002/wcms.1159 ↗
52. 10.1021/ct900494g10.1021/ct900494g ↗
53. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.170310.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.277070810.1063/1.2770708 ↗
55. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.13640610.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136406 ↗
57. 10.1063/1.501662610.1063/1.5016626 ↗
58. 10.1063/1.193504110.1063/1.1935041 ↗
59. 10.1080/0141861830824312110.1080/01418618308243121 ↗
60. 10.1063/1.502460810.1063/1.5024608 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.00510.1016/j.commatsci.2015.04.005 ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.23532010.1103/PhysRevB.84.235320 ↗
63. 10.1006/jcph.1995.103910.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
64. 10.1021/jp027630310.1021/jp0276303 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.01410.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014 ↗
66. 10.1007/s00214005052310.1007/s002140050523 ↗
67. 10.1016/0022-3093(70)90190-010.1016/0022-3093(70)90190-0 ↗
68. 10.1016/0038-1098(71)90643-010.1016/0038-1098(71)90643-0 ↗
69. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0023910.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00239 ↗
70. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b0004110.1021/acs.langmuir.7b00041 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.cossms.2006.02.00110.1016/j.cossms.2006.02.001 ↗
72. 10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00556-210.1016/S0927-7757(00)00556-2 ↗
73. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.13680110.1103/PhysRevLett.99.136801 ↗
74. 10.1021/la00078a01410.1021/la00078a014 ↗
75. 10.1021/j100845a06510.1021/j100845a065 ↗
76. 10.1021/cm500365c10.1021/cm500365c ↗
77. 10.1021/acsami.7b0884010.1021/acsami.7b08840 ↗
78. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0352010.1021/acs.jpcc.8b03520 ↗
79. 10.1063/1.310599210.1063/1.3105992 ↗
80. Fu, S.; Yang, X.; Liu, W. In The Comparison of Different Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Recognition, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service, New York, NY, 2018; pp 12:1–12:6.10.1145/3240876.3240915 ↗
81. Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Hinton, G. E. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25; Pereira, F., Burges, C. J. C., Bottou, L., Weinberger, K. Q., Eds. Curran Associates, Inc., 2012; pp 1097–1105.