journal article·2022-10-26

Rapid Gas-Phase Synthesis of the Perovskite-Type BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ Proton-Conducting Nanocrystalline Electrolyte for Intermediate-Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Zeyun Wu, Yiyang Zhang, Zuoqing Liu, Haorui Ma, Xing Jin, Guangming Yang, Yixiang Shi, Zongping Shao, Shuiqing Li

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 14· Issue 42
Publisher page

Abstract

Perovskite-type proton-conducting materials, such as BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.1Yb0.1O3−δ (BCZYYb), are very attractive for the next-generation equipment of electrochemical energy conversion and storage owing to their excellent conductivity in the intermediate-temperature range (300–750 °C), as well as good thermo-chemical stability, coking resistance, and sulfur tolerance. However, the lack of a reliable and cost-effective synthesis method for such multi-component co-doping oxides limits their large-scale application. In this study, for the first time, we successfully synthesize BCZYYb electrolyte nanopowders by using a rapid, scalable flame-based gas-phase synthesis method with two different barium precursors Ba(NO3)2 and Ba(CH3COO)2, named as BCZYYb (N) and BCZYYb (CA). The as-synthesized nanoparticles exhibit good crystallinity of the pure orthorhombic perovskite BCZYYb phase. BCZYYb (CA) shows more uniform doping with the element ratio of 1:0.74:0.12:0.08:0.1, which is very close to the theoretical value. The shrinkage and surface SEM (scanning electron microscope) results indicate that the flame-made powders have superior sinterability compared to the sol–gel-made powders because of the smaller primary particle size (∼20 nm). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests show that BCZYYb (CA) sintered at 1450 °C has the highest protonic conductivity of 1.31 × 10–2 S cm–1 in wet H2 when operating at 600 °C and still maintains a high-level conductivity of 1.19 × 10–2 S cm–1 even when the sintering temperature is reduced to 1350 °C, which is mainly attributed to uniform doping and good sinterability. The activation energy for the conductivity of BCZYYb (CA) is also significantly lower than that of conventional electrolytes, which suggests much better conductivity in the intermediate (∼600 °C) and even lower operating temperature. The excellent conductivity performance combined with the high-throughput production capability makes the swirling spray flame a promising synthesis method for promoting the BCZYYb electrolytes from lab to industrial-scale solid oxide fuel cells.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China

State Key Laboratory of Multi-Phase Complex Systems, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsami.6b0569410.1021/acsami.6b05694 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.10110.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.10.101 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.06.11510.1016/j.ceramint.2014.06.115 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.ces.2014.12.01110.1016/j.ces.2014.12.011 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ssi.2006.07.04910.1016/j.ssi.2006.07.049 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.01710.1016/j.actamat.2020.08.017 ↗
7. 10.1126/science.aab398710.1126/science.aab3987 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c0237010.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02370 ↗
9. 10.1038/s41560-019-0333-210.1038/s41560-019-0333-2 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.513531910.1063/1.5135319 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.01810.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.10.018 ↗
12. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.09182510.1146/annurev.matsci.33.022802.091825 ↗
13. 10.1007/s41918-021-00097-410.1007/s41918-021-00097-4 ↗
14. 10.1039/C0CP01702G10.1039/C0CP01702G ↗
15. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b0182910.1021/acsenergylett.9b01829 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.0c1006110.1021/acsami.0c10061 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.117481110.1126/science.1174811 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.22810510.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228105 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.01110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.011 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.0021508jes10.1149/2.0021508jes ↗
21. 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.23110.1016/j.proci.2018.06.231 ↗
22. 10.1039/C0NR00017E10.1039/C0NR00017E ↗
23. 10.1016/j.proci.2016.08.07810.1016/j.proci.2016.08.078 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00022-810.1016/S0009-2509(03)00022-8 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.pecs.2016.04.00210.1016/j.pecs.2016.04.002 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsami.8b0839710.1021/acsami.8b08397 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.9b0257210.1021/acsami.9b02572 ↗
28. 10.1021/am502685310.1021/am5026853 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsami.1c0218010.1021/acsami.1c02180 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.9b2039710.1021/acsami.9b20397 ↗
31. 10.1021/am301920r10.1021/am301920r ↗
32. 10.1021/acsami.6b0064110.1021/acsami.6b00641 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.1c1405510.1021/acsami.1c14055 ↗
34. 10.1021/am401442v10.1021/am401442v ↗
35. 10.1021/acsami.1c0393010.1021/acsami.1c03930 ↗
36. 10.1021/acsami.0c1302110.1021/acsami.0c13021 ↗
37. 10.1134/S106636221403006010.1134/S1066362214030060 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.04710.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.08.047 ↗
39. 10.1016/0167-2738(94)90321-210.1016/0167-2738(94)90321-2 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.09210.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.01.092 ↗