Structure–Property Relation in Organic–Metal Oxide Hybrid Phototransistors
Source abstract
Abstract
We report an optoelectronic device consisting of a solution-processed indium gallium zinc oxide (IGZO) thin-film transistor and vacuum-deposited small organic molecules. Depending on the configurations of the organic materials, either bulk heterojunction or planar heterojunction (PHJ), the device assumes the functionality of either a photosensor or a photoinduced memory, respectively. Under λ = 625 nm light illumination, the photosensor shows response and recovery time of ∼50 ms, responsivity of ∼5 mA/W, sensitivity above 104, and a linear response. The mechanism of the photoinduced memory is studied experimentally and verified using a device simulation. We find that the memory is due to long charge retention time at the organic PHJ interface which is stable for over 9 days. It is correlated with the low leakage current found in ordered organic junctions having low subgap tail states. The presented integration of the PHJ with the transistor constitutes a new design of write-once-read-many-times memory device that is likely to be attractive for low-cost applications.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Zisapel Nano-Electronics Center, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
Funding
United States-Israel Binational Science Foundation · Israel Science Foundation · Adelis Foundation · Technion Ollendorff Minerva Center
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20120497910.1002/adma.201204979 ↗
2. 10.1002/pi.321310.1002/pi.3213 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.153462110.1063/1.1534621 ↗
4. 10.7567/jjap.53.02ba0210.7567/jjap.53.02ba02 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20110322810.1002/adma.201103228 ↗
6. 10.1088/1468-6996/11/4/04430510.1088/1468-6996/11/4/044305 ↗
7. 10.1021/am500126b10.1021/am500126b ↗
8. 10.1021/acsami.9b1431010.1021/acsami.9b14310 ↗
9. 10.1038/nature0309010.1038/nature03090 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2005.02033.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2005.02033.x ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20080321110.1002/adma.200803211 ↗
12. de la Fuente Vornbrock, A.; Almanza-Workman, M.; Dickin, F.; Elder, R. E.; Garcia, R. A.; Holland, E.; Jackson, W.; Jam, M.; Jeans, A.; Kim, H.; Luo, H.; Kwon, O.; Maltabes, J.; Mei, P.; Perlov, C.; Rudin, J. C.; Smith, M.; Trovinger, S.; Zhao, L.; Taussig, C. P. A Comparison of Processes and Challenges between Organic, a-Si:H, and Oxide TFTS for Active Matrix Backplanes on Plastic. 2012 19th International Workshop on Active-Matrix Flatpanel Displays and Devices (AM-FPD); IEEE, July 4–6, 2012; pp 57–60.
13. 10.1063/1.492264210.1063/1.4922642 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.7b1649810.1021/acsami.7b16498 ↗
15. 10.1021/am302765a10.1021/am302765a ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.5b1121010.1021/acsami.5b11210 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20150299610.1002/adma.201502996 ↗
18. 10.1063/1.367115310.1063/1.3671153 ↗
19. 10.1109/ted.2018.279871010.1109/ted.2018.2798710 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.physb.2019.03.00710.1016/j.physb.2019.03.007 ↗
21. 10.1021/am400943z10.1021/am400943z ↗
22. 10.1002/adfm.20140437510.1002/adfm.201404375 ↗
23. 10.1039/c7cp05290a10.1039/c7cp05290a ↗
24. 10.1088/1361-6463/aa7f1c10.1088/1361-6463/aa7f1c ↗
25. 10.1103/physrevb.75.11532710.1103/physrevb.75.115327 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.synthmet.2017.11.01310.1016/j.synthmet.2017.11.013 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.142976710.1063/1.1429767 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.02.00510.1016/j.orgel.2013.02.005 ↗
29. 10.1038/nphoton.2017.1510.1038/nphoton.2017.15 ↗
30. 10.1109/ted.2004.82961910.1109/ted.2004.829619 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.327333210.1063/1.3273332 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.499682610.1063/1.4996826 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.482504810.1063/1.4825048 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20110103410.1002/adma.201101034 ↗
35. 10.1039/c9nh00076c10.1039/c9nh00076c ↗