journal article·2018-01-17

Functionalization of SiO2 Surfaces for Si Monolayer Doping with Minimal Carbon Contamination

Maart van Druenen, Gillian Collins, Colm Glynn, Colm O’Dwyer, Justin D. Holmes

Publisher page

Abstract

Monolayer doping (MLD) involves the functionalization of semiconductor surfaces followed by an annealing step to diffuse the dopant into the substrate. We report an alternative doping method, oxide-MLD, where ultrathin SiO 2 overlayers are functionalized with phosphonic acids for doping Si. Similar peak carrier concentrations were achieved when compared with hydrosilylated surfaces (∼2 × 10 20 atoms/cm 3 ). Oxide-MLD offers several advantages over conventional MLD, such as ease of sample processing, superior ambient stability, and minimal carbon contamination. The incorporation of an oxide layer minimizes carbon contamination by facilitating attachment of carbon-free precursors or by impeding carbon diffusion. The oxide-MLD strategy allows selection of many inexpensive precursors and therefore allows application to both p- and n-doping. The phosphonic acid-functionalized SiO 2 surfaces were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, whereas doping was assessed using electrochemical capacitance voltage and Hall measurements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry, and Tyndall National Institute, University College Cork, Cork, T12 YN60 Ireland

CRANN@AMBER, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland

Funding

Irish Research Council for Science, Engineering and Technology

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat205810.1038/nmat2058 ↗
2. Purser K. H. · 1984
3. 10.1021/acsami.5b0376810.1021/acsami.5b03768 ↗
4. 10.1039/C6NR07623H10.1039/C6NR07623H ↗
5. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0020410.1021/acsomega.7b00204 ↗
6. Long, B.; Alessio Verni, G.; O’Connell, J.; Holmes, J.; Shayesteh, M.; O’Connell, D.; Duffy, R.InMolecular Layer Doping: Non-Destructive Doping of Silicon and Germanium, 2014 20th International Conference on Ion Implantation Technology (IIT), Portland, 2014; pp1–4.10.1109/IIT.2014.6939995 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.5b0895210.1021/acsami.5b08952 ↗
8. 10.1038/srep4129910.1038/srep41299 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20100362510.1002/adma.201003625 ↗
10. 10.1021/nl803252610.1021/nl8032526 ↗
11. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/34/34200210.1088/0957-4484/27/34/342002 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01553-910.1016/S0039-6028(01)01553-9 ↗
13. 10.1021/la402480f10.1021/la402480f ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0340810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03408 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0429110.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04291 ↗
16. 10.1002/anie.20130670910.1002/anie.201306709 ↗
17. 10.1021/la300709n10.1021/la300709n ↗
18. 10.1016/j.progsurf.2012.10.00310.1016/j.progsurf.2012.10.003 ↗
19. 10.1143/JJAP.36.146510.1143/JJAP.36.1465 ↗
20. 10.1021/jz401909510.1021/jz4019095 ↗
21. Imai S. · Acta Phys. Slovaca · 2005 · 55 · 305
22. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.04.01510.1016/j.susc.2006.04.015 ↗
23. 10.1002/1096-9918(200006)29:6<403::AID-SIA884>3.0.CO;2-810.1002/1096-9918(200006)29:6<403::AID-SIA884>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.susc.2005.11.03010.1016/j.susc.2005.11.030 ↗
25. 10.1002/anie.20080073710.1002/anie.200800737 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.12810.1016/j.apsusc.2013.09.128 ↗
27. 10.1021/la102143810.1021/la1021438 ↗
28. 10.1021/ja035956z10.1021/ja035956z ↗
29. 10.1021/jp710893k10.1021/jp710893k ↗
30. 10.1021/la303845710.1021/la3038457 ↗
31. 10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01387-510.1016/S0039-6028(01)01387-5 ↗
32. 10.1021/jp052595w10.1021/jp052595w ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20120280810.1002/adfm.201202808 ↗
34. 10.1039/C3NR03605G10.1039/C3NR03605G ↗