journal article·2015-04-29

Elucidating the Impact of Molecular Packing and Device Architecture on the Performance of Nanostructured Perylene Diimide Solar Cells

Eduardo Aluicio-Sarduy, Ranbir Singh, Zhipeng Kan, Tengling Ye, Aliaksandr Baidak, Alberto Calloni, Giulia Berti, Lamberto Duò, Agathaggelos Iosifidis, Serge Beaupré, Mario Leclerc, Hans-Jürgen Butt, George Floudas, Panagiotis E. Keivanidis

Publisher page

Abstract

The performance of organic photovoltaic devices (OPV) with nanostructured polymer:perylene diimide (PDI) photoactive layers approaches the levels of the corresponding polymer:fullerene systems. Nevertheless, a coherent understanding of the difficulty for PDI-based OPV devices to deliver high power conversion efficiencies remains elusive. Here we perform a comparative study of a set of four different polymer:PDI OPV model systems. The different device performances observed are attributed to differences in the nanostructural motif of these composites, as determined by wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) measurements. Long-range structural order in the PDI domain dictates (i) the stabilization energy and (ii) the concentration of the PDI excimers in the composites. The quenching of the PDI excimer photoluminescence (PL) is found to be insensitive to the former, but it depends on the latter. High PL quenching occurs for the low concentration of PDI excimers that are formed in PDI columns with a length comparable to the PDI excimer diffusion length. The stabilization of the PDI excimer state increases as the long-range order in the PDI domains improves. The structural order of the PDI domains primarily affects charge transport. Electron mobility reduces as the size of the PDI domain increases, suggesting that well-ordered PDI domains suffer from poor electronic connectivity. WAXS further reveals the presence of additional intermolecular PDI interactions, other than the direct face-to-face intermolecular coupling, that introduce a substantial energetic disorder in the polymer:PDI composites. Conventional device architectures with hole-collecting ITO/PEDOT:PSS bottom electrodes are compared with inverted device architectures bearing bottom electron-collecting electrodes of ITO/ZnO. In all cases the ZnO-functionalized devices surpass the performance of the conventional device analogues. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy explains that in PEDOT: PSS-functionalized devices, the PDI component preferentially segregates closer to the hydrophilic PEDOT: PSS electrode, thus impeding the efficient charge extraction and limiting device photocurrent.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Centre for Nanoscience and Technology@PoliMi, Via Giovanni Pascoli 70/3, 20133 Milano, Italy

Dipartimento di Fisica, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133, Milano, Italy

University of Ioannina, Department of Physics, 451 10 Ioannina, Greece

Département de Chimie, Université Laval, Pavillon A-Vachon 1045, Avenue de la Médecine, Québec City, Québec, Canada G1 V 0A6

Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, Ackermannweg 10, D-55128, Mainz, Germany

Cyprus University of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science and Engineering, Dorothea Bldg 511, 45 Kitiou Kyprianou Street, 3041 Limassol, Cyprus

Funding

Fondazione Cariplo

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Green M. A. · Prog. Photovoltaics · 2014 · 22 · 110.1002/pip.2452 ↗
2. dos Reis Benatto G. A. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2014 · 4 · 140073210.1002/aenm.201400732 ↗
3. Service R. F. · Science · 2011 · 332 · 29310.1126/science.332.6027.293 ↗
4. Sariciftci N. S. · Science · 1992 · 258 · 147410.1126/science.258.5087.1474 ↗
5. Halls J. J. M. · Nature · 1995 · 376 · 49810.1038/376498a0 ↗
6. Azzopardi B. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 374110.1039/c1ee01766g ↗
7. Mulligan C. J. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2014 · 120 · 910.1016/j.solmat.2013.07.041 ↗
8. Machui F. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2014 · 7 · 279210.1039/C4EE01222D ↗
9. Anctil A. · Environ. Sci. Technol. · 2011 · 45 · 235310.1021/es103860a ↗
10. Anctil A. · Prog. Photovoltaics · 2013 · 21 · 154110.1002/pip.2226 ↗
11. Baffreau J. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2006 · 110 · 1312310.1021/jp066415+ ↗
12. Struijk C. W. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2000 · 122 · 1105710.1021/ja000991g ↗
13. Singh R. · Org. Electron. · 2014 · 15 · 134710.1016/j.orgel.2014.03.044 ↗
14. Tasios N. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 747810.1021/ja102150g ↗
15. Chen Z. · Chem.—Eur. J. · 2007 · 13 · 45010.1002/chem.200600891 ↗
16. Lindquist R. J. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 1491210.1021/ja507653p ↗
17. Keivanidis P. E. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2008 · 18 · 318910.1002/adfm.200800356 ↗
18. Brown K. E. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2014 · 5 · 258810.1021/jz5011797 ↗
19. Vertsimakha Y. · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 795010.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.048 ↗
21. Ye T.-L. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 1184410.1021/am4035416 ↗
22. Di Donato E. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2010 · 114 · 532710.1021/jp101040r ↗
23. Mizoshita N. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2011 · 21 · 329110.1002/adfm.201100444 ↗
24. Takada T. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 681410.1021/ja501535z ↗
25. Sharenko A. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 440310.1002/adma.201301167 ↗
26. Sharenko A. · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 410910.1021/cm5010483 ↗
27. Singh R. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 1434810.1039/C4TA02851A ↗
28. Sun Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 167910.1002/adma.201004301 ↗
29. Lu Z. · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 290710.1021/cm5006339 ↗
30. Zang Y. · Adv. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 570810.1002/adma.201401992 ↗
31. Singh R. · Org. Photonics Photovoltaics · 2013 · 1 · 2410.2478/oph-2013-0003 ↗
32. Zhao J. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2015 · 8 · 52010.1039/C4EE02990A ↗
33. Wakim S. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2009 · 19 · 535110.1039/b901302d ↗
34. Berti G. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2014 · 85 · 07390110.1063/1.4885447 ↗
35. Xu Z. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 122710.1002/adfm.200801286 ↗
36. Jones C. M. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2010 · 2 · 218510.1021/am1004893 ↗
37. 10.1117/12.206392910.1117/12.2063929 ↗
38. Guo X. · Chem. Mater. · 2014 · 26 · 359510.1021/cm5017245 ↗
39. Sun K. · Nat. Commun. · 2015 · 6 · 601310.1038/ncomms7013 ↗
40. Chen C.-S. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2012 · 101 · 18010.1016/j.solmat.2012.01.042 ↗
41. Keivanidis P. E. · Adv. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 518310.1002/adma.201002389 ↗
42. Hayer A. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 765310.1021/jp0573689 ↗
43. Gierschner J. · J. Phys. Chem. A · 2004 · 108 · 25710.1021/jp036952j ↗
44. Dittmer J. J. · Adv. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 127010.1002/1521-4095(200009)12:17<1270::AID-ADMA1270>3.0.CO;2-8 ↗
45. Martinelli N. G. · ChemPhysChem · 2009 · 10 · 226510.1002/cphc.200900298 ↗
46. Baranovskii S. D. · Phys. Status Solidi B · 2014 · 251 · 48710.1002/pssb.201350339 ↗
47. Gehrig D. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 2007710.1021/jp503366m ↗
48. Koster L. J. A. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 123509/1
49. Kirchartz T. · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 11520910.1103/PhysRevB.83.115209 ↗
50. Blakesley J. C. · Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 07521010.1103/PhysRevB.84.075210 ↗