Engineering Asymmetric Charge Injection/Extraction to Optimize Organic Transistor Performances
Source abstract
Abstract
The introduction of an appropriate functionality on the electrode/active layer interface has been found to be an efficient methodology to enhance the electrical performances of organic field-effect transistors (OFETs). Herein, we efficiently optimized the charge injection/extraction characteristics of source/drain (S/D) electrodes by applying an asymmetric functionalization at each individual electrode/organic semiconductor (OSC) interface. To further clarify the functionalizing effects of the electrode/OSC interface, we systematically designed five different OFETs: one with pristine S/D electrodes (denoted as pristine S/D) and the remaining ones made by symmetrically or asymmetrically functionalizing the S/D electrodes with up to two different self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) based on thiolated molecules, the strongly electron-donating thiophenol (TP) and electron-withdrawing 2,3,4,5-pentafluorobenzenethiol (PFBT). Both the S and D electrodes were functionalized with TP (denoted as TP-S/D) in one of the two symmetric cases and with PFBT in the other (PFBT-S/D). In each of the two asymmetric cases, one of the S/D electrodes was functionalized with TP and the other with PFBT (to produce PFBT-S/TP-D and TP-S/PFBT-D OFETs). The vapor-deposited p-type dinaphtho[2,3-b:2′,3′-f]thieno[3,2-b]thiophene was used as the OSC active layer. The PFBT-S/TP-D case exhibited a field-effect mobility (μFET) of 0.86 ± 0.23 cm2 V–1 s–1, about three times better than that of the pristine S/D case (0.31 ± 0.12 cm2 V–1 s–1). On the other hand, the μFET of the TP-S/PFBT-D case (0.18 ± 0.10 cm2 V–1 s–1) was significantly lower than that of the pristine case and even lower than those of the TP-S/D (0.23 ± 0.07 cm2 V–1 s–1) and PFBT-S/D (0.58 ± 0.19 cm2 V–1 s–1) cases. These results were clearly correlated with the additional hole density, surface potential, and effective work function. In addition, the contact resistance (RC) for the asymmetric PFBT-S/TP-D case was 10-fold less than that for the TP-S/PFBT-D case and more than five times lower than that for the pristine case. The results contribute a meaningful step forward in improving the electrical performances of various organic electronics such as OFETs, inverters, solar cells, and sensors.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, Hanbat National University, Daejeon 34158, Republic of Korea
School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (65)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/JETCAS.2017.267386310.1109/JETCAS.2017.2673863 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature0249810.1038/nature02498 ↗
3. 10.1038/nmat289610.1038/nmat2896 ↗
4. 10.1021/am501197d10.1021/am501197d ↗
5. 10.1021/nl100966210.1021/nl1009662 ↗
6. 10.1002/adma.20160476910.1002/adma.201604769 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.03.03810.1016/j.orgel.2017.03.038 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20170491610.1002/adma.201704916 ↗
9. 10.1021/ar200006r10.1021/ar200006r ↗
10. 10.1021/am200705j10.1021/am200705j ↗
11. 10.1002/adma.20110333410.1002/adma.201103334 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20170564210.1002/adma.201705642 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.7b0186510.1021/acsami.7b01865 ↗
14. 10.1038/nmat216710.1038/nmat2167 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20100097110.1002/adma.201000971 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20150040110.1002/adma.201500401 ↗
17. 10.1038/nmat365010.1038/nmat3650 ↗
18. 10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70019-610.1016/S1369-7021(07)70019-6 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl202879810.1021/nl2028798 ↗
20. 10.1002/admi.20140038410.1002/admi.201400384 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20100373610.1002/adma.201003736 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20170716410.1002/adma.201707164 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20100316510.1002/adma.201003165 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0184210.1021/acsnano.6b01842 ↗
25. 10.1002/adma.20080015010.1002/adma.200800150 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.311582610.1063/1.3115826 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.212614010.1063/1.2126140 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.05.01910.1016/j.orgel.2014.05.019 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.253574110.1063/1.2535741 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20110030410.1002/adma.201100304 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mattod.2014.08.03710.1016/j.mattod.2014.08.037 ↗
32. 10.1039/C6CS00509H10.1039/C6CS00509H ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20080113510.1002/adfm.200801135 ↗
34. 10.1002/adfm.20110231210.1002/adfm.201102312 ↗
35. 10.7567/APEX.7.03570110.7567/APEX.7.035701 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.04.05110.1016/j.orgel.2013.04.051 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.161127810.1063/1.1611278 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.221513210.1063/1.2215132 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.07.03210.1016/j.orgel.2017.07.032 ↗
40. 10.1038/srep4636510.1038/srep46365 ↗
41. 10.1039/C5TC00243E10.1039/C5TC00243E ↗
42. 10.1002/adma.20160065110.1002/adma.201600651 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.35500210.1063/1.355002 ↗
44. 10.1038/2995410.1038/29954 ↗
45. 10.1002/adfm.20080101910.1002/adfm.200801019 ↗
46. 10.1038/ncomms172110.1038/ncomms1721 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.04.01810.1016/j.orgel.2011.04.018 ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20050115210.1002/adma.200501152 ↗
49. 10.1021/ja063290d10.1021/ja063290d ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0553310.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05533 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0069010.1021/acsomega.7b00690 ↗
52. 10.1038/nmat211910.1038/nmat2119 ↗
53. 10.1039/C7TC00664K10.1039/C7TC00664K ↗
54. 10.3987/REV-10-69010.3987/REV-10-690 ↗
55. 10.1021/cr050154310.1021/cr0501543 ↗
56. 10.1021/ja303807u10.1021/ja303807u ↗
57. 10.1021/jp803124j10.1021/jp803124j ↗
58. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.10.00410.1016/j.orgel.2016.10.004 ↗
59. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b0120710.1021/acs.chemmater.5b01207 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.04010.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.040 ↗
61. 10.1039/C5CP06320E10.1039/C5CP06320E ↗
62. 10.1021/acsami.6b0722910.1021/acsami.6b07229 ↗
63. 10.1039/C7NR03223D10.1039/C7NR03223D ↗
64. 10.1063/1.486853610.1063/1.4868536 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.23541810.1103/PhysRevB.68.235418 ↗