journal article·2013-11-13

Viscous Conductive Glue Layer in Semitransparent Polymer-Based Solar Cells Fabricated by a Lamination Process

Chieko Shimada, Seimei Shiratori

Publisher page

Abstract

Semitransparent polymer-based solar cells were fabricated by using a low-cost, vacuum-free lamination process. This process is to deposit a conductive glue solution on the transparent Ag film, followed by lamination with the active layer. The glue solution and a mixture of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene): poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) and d-sorbitol was used. To allow future improvements in the conversion efficiency of these cells, we investigated the relationship between major factors of the conductive glue layer and photovoltaic property. As a result, it was suggested that photovoltaic property had less of a relation to conductivity of the conductive glue layer but a strong correlation with the contact area within a certain range of the film thickness of the conductive glue layer. The optimized cells exhibited 2.22% and 2.41% of power conversion efficiencies during front and backside 100 mW cm(-2) AM1.5G illumination with reflection paper, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Integrated Design Engineering, Keio University, Minato, Tokyo 108-8345, Japan

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Koeppe R. · ChemSusChem · 2009 · 2 · 30910.1002/cssc.200900029 ↗
2. Lunt R. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 113305-1
3. Wilken S. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2012 · 96 · 14110.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.044 ↗
4. Winkler T. · Org. Electron. · 2011 · 12 · 161210.1016/j.orgel.2011.06.015 ↗
5. Lewis J. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2011 · 95 · 281610.1016/j.solmat.2011.05.037 ↗
6. Luber E. J. · ACS Nano · 2013 · 7 · 470810.1021/nn402883g ↗
7. Lim Y. F. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 93 · 193301-1
8. Peh R. J. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2011 · 95 · 357910.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.018 ↗
9. Kang J. W. · Org. Electron. · 2012 · 13 · 294010.1016/j.orgel.2012.08.012 ↗
10. Zhou Y. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2009 · 93 · 49710.1016/j.solmat.2008.11.002 ↗
11. Gaynor W. · ACS Nano · 2010 · 4 · 3010.1021/nn900758e ↗
12. Zhou Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2010 · 97 · 153304-1
13. Ranby B. · J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis · 1989 · 15 · 23710.1016/0165-2370(89)85037-5 ↗
14. Eichinger K. · Spectrochim. Acta, Part A: Mol. Spectrosc. · 1991 · 47 · 66110.1016/0584-8539(91)80082-T ↗
15. Zimmermann B. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2009 · 93 · 49110.1016/j.solmat.2008.12.022 ↗
16. Norman K. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2010 · 132 · 166883
17. Katz E. A. · Eur. Phys. J. Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 36 · 30710.1051/epjap:2006159 ↗
18. Seemann A. · Org. Electron. · 2009 · 10 · 142410.1016/j.orgel.2009.08.001 ↗
19. Huang J. · Adv. Mater. · 2008 · 20 · 41510.1002/adma.200701101 ↗
20. Bailey B. A. · Org. Electron. · 2011 · 12 · 10810.1016/j.orgel.2010.10.008 ↗
21. Yuan Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 063306-1
22. Peng B. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 98 · 243308-1
23. Okada I. · ACS Appl.Mater. Interfaces · 2013 · 5 · 414410.1021/am4000722 ↗
24. Nardes A. M. · Org. Electron. · 2008 · 9 · 72710.1016/j.orgel.2008.05.006 ↗
25. Nikogeorgos N. · Langmuir · 2012 · 28 · 1770910.1021/la304246e ↗
26. Manoharan M. P. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 42 · 09530410.1088/0022-3727/42/9/095304 ↗
27. Maeno Y. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 94 · 01210310.1063/1.3050450 ↗
28. Kanaga Karuppiah K. S. · Tribol. Lett. · 2009 · 36 · 25910.1007/s11249-009-9483-x ↗
29. Palyacov B. · Surf. Sci. · 2012 · 606 · 139310.1016/j.susc.2012.04.029 ↗