Understanding the Enhancement Mechanism of ZnO Nanorod-based Piezoelectric Devices through Surface Engineering
Source abstract
Abstract
ZnO is a typical piezoelectric semiconductor, and enhancing the piezoelectric output of ZnO-based devices is essential for their efficient applications. Surface engineering is an effective strategy to improve the piezoelectric output of ZnO-based devices, but its unclear regulation mechanism leads to a lack of reasonable guidance for device design. In this work, the regulation effect of the barrier layer in ZnO-based piezoelectric devices is systematically investigated from the carrier perspective through surface engineering, resulting in a significant improvement (nearly 10-fold) in the output performance of piezoelectric devices. The regulation mechanism of the ZnO–Cu2O p–n heterojunction devices on piezoelectric output is revealed in terms of built-in electric field, depletion layer width, and junction capacitance. These findings facilitate further insight into the enhancement mechanism of the piezoelectric output of ZnO-based devices and provide reasonable ideas for efficient device design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · ZnO doping and properties · Tactile and Sensory Interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Advanced Technologies of Materials (Ministry of Education), School of Materials Science and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, China
Funding
Southwest Jiaotong University · Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Basic Research Cultivation Project
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c0138010.1021/acsenergylett.1c01380 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.xcrp.2022.10081410.1016/j.xcrp.2022.100814 ↗
3. 10.1039/d1cs00858g10.1039/d1cs00858g ↗
4. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.01310.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.013 ↗
5. 10.20517/ss.2021.0210.20517/ss.2021.02 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsnano.1c0160610.1021/acsnano.1c01606 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsami.0c1449010.1021/acsami.0c14490 ↗
8. 10.1038/nnano.2010.4610.1038/nnano.2010.46 ↗
9. 10.1002/adma.20110372710.1002/adma.201103727 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsami.8b0245810.1021/acsami.8b02458 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.07610.1016/j.nanoen.2019.03.076 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0844710.1021/acsnano.7b08447 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20160634610.1002/adma.201606346 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10565310.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105653 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20150112110.1002/adma.201501121 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsphotonics.1c0149010.1021/acsphotonics.1c01490 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.123485510.1126/science.1234855 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10470610.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104706 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10582010.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105820 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15617210.1016/j.jallcom.2020.156172 ↗
21. 10.1039/c2ee23404a10.1039/c2ee23404a ↗
22. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c0079310.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00793 ↗
23. 10.1021/nl204440g10.1021/nl204440g ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20120015010.1002/adma.201200150 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.06210.1016/j.nanoen.2017.01.062 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.13126210.1016/j.cej.2021.131262 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10593810.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105938 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.06.00810.1016/j.nanoen.2014.06.008 ↗
29. 10.1039/c4ta01714e10.1039/c4ta01714e ↗
30. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.01.03210.1016/j.nanoen.2015.01.032 ↗
31. 10.1039/c8nr09418g10.1039/c8nr09418g ↗
32. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.00610.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.07.006 ↗
33. 10.1021/acsami.6b0364910.1021/acsami.6b03649 ↗
34. 10.1021/acsami.1c0740110.1021/acsami.1c07401 ↗
35. 10.1007/s12274-014-0447-610.1007/s12274-014-0447-6 ↗
36. 10.1002/aenm.20120020510.1002/aenm.201200205 ↗