journal article·2020-08-12

Intrinsic Ultralow-Threshold Laser Action from Rationally Molecular Design of Metal–Organic Framework Materials

Krishna Prasad Bera, Saqib Kamal, Arif I. Inamdar, Batjargal Sainbileg, Hung-I Lin, Yu-Ming Liao, Rapti Ghosh, Ting-Jia Chang, Yen-Guang Lee, Hou Cheng-Fu, Yun-Tzu Hsu, Michitoshi Hayashi, Chen-Hsiung Hung, Tzuoo-Tsair Luo, Kuang-Lieh Lu, Yang-Fang Chen

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 32
Publisher page

Abstract

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are superior for multiple applications including drug delivery, sensing, and gas storage because of their tunable physiochemical properties and fascinating architectures. Optoelectronic application of MOFs is difficult because of their porous geometry and conductivity issues. Recently, a few optoelectronic devices have been fabricated by a suitable design of integrating MOFs with other materials. However, demonstration of laser action arising from MOFs as intrinsic gain media still remains challenging, even though some studies endeavor on encapsulating luminescence organic laser dyes into the porous skeleton of MOFs to achieve laser action. Unfortunately, the aggregation of such unstable laser dyes causes photoluminescence quenching and energy loss, which limits their practical application. In this research, unprecedently, we demonstrated ultralow-threshold (∼13 nJ/cm2) MOF laser action by a judicious choice of metal nodes and organic linkers during synthesis of MOFs. Importantly, we also demonstrated that the white random lasing from the beautiful microflowers of organic linkers possesses a porous network, which is utilized to synthesize the MOFs. The highly luminescent broad-band organic linker 1,4-NDC, which itself exhibits a strong white random laser, is used not only to achieve the stimulated emission in MOFs but also to reduce the lasing threshold. Such white lasing has multiple applications from bioimaging to the recently developed versatile Li-Fi technology. In addition, we showed that the smooth facets of MOF microcrystals can show Fabry–Perot resonant cavities having a high quality factor of ∼103 with excellent photostability. Our unique discovery of stable, nontoxic, high-performance MOF laser action will open up a new route for the development of new optoelectronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials · Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Organic and Molecular Conductors Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan

Nano-Science and Technology Program, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan

Institute of Chemistry, Academia Sinica, Taipei 115, Taiwan

Molecular-Science and Technology Program,Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan

Department of Chemistry, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan

Sustainable Chemical Science and Technology, Taiwan International Graduate Program, Academia Sinica, Taipei 106, Taiwan and Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 300, Taiwan

Center for Condensed Matter Sciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan

Center of Atomic Initiative for New Materials, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan

Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 106, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Education · Academia Sinica · Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan · Center of Atomic Initiative for New Materials, National Taiwan University

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41566-019-0407-510.1038/s41566-019-0407-5 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41467-018-06170-910.1038/s41467-018-06170-9 ↗
3. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.9010.1038/nphoton.2012.90 ↗
4. 10.1038/nphys97110.1038/nphys971 ↗
5. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.19910.1038/nphoton.2015.199 ↗
6. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.16710.1038/nphoton.2010.167 ↗
7. 10.1038/3501818410.1038/35018184 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.558410.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5584 ↗
9. 10.1021/acsnano.7b0020110.1021/acsnano.7b00201 ↗
10. 10.1002/adom.20180038210.1002/adom.201800382 ↗
11. 10.1038/ncomms1108710.1038/ncomms11087 ↗
12. 10.1126/science.106036710.1126/science.1060367 ↗
13. 10.1038/nature0219310.1038/nature02193 ↗
14. 10.1002/smtd.20170016310.1002/smtd.201700163 ↗
15. 10.1021/jz500528510.1021/jz5005285 ↗
16. 10.1038/ncomms1405110.1038/ncomms14051 ↗
17. 10.1038/s41563-018-0038-010.1038/s41563-018-0038-0 ↗
18. 10.1038/451410a10.1038/451410a ↗
19. 10.1021/acsami.8b1710710.1021/acsami.8b17107 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0303010.1021/acsnano.6b03030 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20180480210.1002/adfm.201804802 ↗
22. 10.1038/ncomms371910.1038/ncomms3719 ↗
23. 10.1002/adma.20160184410.1002/adma.201601844 ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20160563710.1002/adma.201605637 ↗
25. 10.1039/C9QM00090A10.1039/C9QM00090A ↗
26. 10.1021/jacs.9b0951710.1021/jacs.9b09517 ↗
27. 10.1038/nnano.2015.14910.1038/nnano.2015.149 ↗
28. 10.1038/nnano.2012.6110.1038/nnano.2012.61 ↗
29. 10.1038/nmat225310.1038/nmat2253 ↗
30. 10.1364/OL.35.00245110.1364/OL.35.002451 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.inoche.2014.03.01110.1016/j.inoche.2014.03.011 ↗
32. 10.1039/c3ce42208a10.1039/c3ce42208a ↗
33. Goodman L. · 1975 · 24110.1007/978-1-4684-2175-0_14 ↗
34. 10.1039/C4CC07634F10.1039/C4CC07634F ↗
35. 10.1039/c3cs60232j10.1039/c3cs60232j ↗
36. 10.1016/j.nanoso.2019.10036410.1016/j.nanoso.2019.100364 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0050510.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b00505 ↗
38. 10.1039/C9TC03858B10.1039/C9TC03858B ↗
39. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b0226410.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02264 ↗
40. 10.1039/C8RA06043F10.1039/C8RA06043F ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.8b1589410.1021/acsami.8b15894 ↗
42. 10.3390/inorganics712014410.3390/inorganics7120144 ↗
43. 10.1039/b802352m10.1039/b802352m ↗
44. 10.1038/nprot.2013.08710.1038/nprot.2013.087 ↗
45. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.5b0722810.1021/acsami.5b07228 ↗
47. 10.1002/adma.20170354910.1002/adma.201703549 ↗
48. 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b0126610.1021/acsphotonics.7b01266 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0303510.1021/acsnano.8b03035 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.347953210.1063/1.3479532 ↗
51. 10.1039/C5RA08393A10.1039/C5RA08393A ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.703510.1103/PhysRevB.58.7035 ↗
53. 10.1039/C9CP04033A10.1039/C9CP04033A ↗
54. 10.1088/1464-4258/5/4/30610.1088/1464-4258/5/4/306 ↗
55. 10.1039/C8CC10232E10.1039/C8CC10232E ↗
56. 10.1002/adom.20180120210.1002/adom.201801202 ↗
57. 10.1038/ncomms905610.1038/ncomms9056 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.scib.2016.12.00210.1016/j.scib.2016.12.002 ↗
59. 10.1039/C9NR09644B10.1039/C9NR09644B ↗
60. 10.1038/nmat427110.1038/nmat4271 ↗
61. 10.1038/srep0024410.1038/srep00244 ↗
62. 10.1021/jacs.9b0519110.1021/jacs.9b05191 ↗
63. 10.1021/jacs.8b0988710.1021/jacs.8b09887 ↗
64. 10.1021/ja209327q10.1021/ja209327q ↗
65. 10.1021/ja500686610.1021/ja5006866 ↗
66. 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b0053010.1021/acs.accounts.5b00530 ↗
67. 10.1021/nl202309610.1021/nl2023096 ↗
68. 10.1002/adma.20120157910.1002/adma.201201579 ↗
69. 10.1039/C5NR05379J10.1039/C5NR05379J ↗
70. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.139610.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗