In Situ Mapping of the Molecular Arrangement of Amphiphilic Dye Molecules at the TiO2 Surface of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Amphiphilic sensitizers are central to the function of dye-sensitized solar cells. It is known that the cell's performance depends on the molecular arrangement and the density of the dye on the semiconductor surface, but a molecular-level picture of the cell-electrolyte interface is still lacking. Here, we present subnanometer in situ atomic force microscopy images of the Z907 dye at the surface of TiO2 in a relevant liquid. Our results reveal changes in the conformation and the lateral arrangement of the dye molecules, depending on their average packing density on the surface. Complementary quantitative measurements on the ensemble of the film are obtained by the quartz-crystal microbalance with dissipation technique. An atomistic picture of the dye coverage-dependent packing, the effectiveness of the hydrophobic alkyl chains as blocking layer, and the solvent accessibility is obtained from molecular dynamics simulations.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
EPFL STI IMX SUNMIL, Station 12, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Physics Department, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom
EPFL SB ISIC LCBC, BC, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
EPFL SB ISIC LPI, Station 6, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Funding
European Research Council · Schweizerische Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Akkerman H. B. · Nature · 2006 · 441 · 6910.1038/nature04699 ↗
2. Bain C. D. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1988 · 110 · 366510.1021/ja00219a055 ↗
3. Flink S. · Adv. Mater. · 2000 · 12 · 131510.1002/1521-4095(200009)12:18<1315::AID-ADMA1315>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
4. Langer R. · Nature · 2004 · 428 · 48710.1038/nature02388 ↗
5. O’Regan B. · Nature · 1991 · 353 · 73710.1038/353737a0 ↗
6. Love J. C. · Chem. Rev. · 2005 · 105 · 110310.1021/cr0300789 ↗
7. Hagfeldt A. · Chem. Rev. · 2010 · 110 · 659510.1021/cr900356p ↗
8. Han L. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 605710.1039/c2ee03418b ↗
9. Gao F. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2008 · 130 · 1072010.1021/ja801942j ↗
10. Grätzel M. · Prog. Photovoltaics: Res. Appl. · 2006 · 14 · 42910.1002/pip.712 ↗
11. Yella A. · Science · 2011 · 334 · 62910.1126/science.1209688 ↗
12. Kuna J. J. · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 83710.1038/nmat2534 ↗
13. Schiffmann F. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 839810.1021/jp100268r ↗
14. Yu S. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 133 · 22470410.1063/1.3509389 ↗
15. Marinado T. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 1190310.1021/jp102381x ↗
16. Rienzo A. · J. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 132 · 08470310.1063/1.3336747 ↗
17. Kley C. S. · Nano Lett. · 2014 · 14 · 56310.1021/nl403717d ↗
18. Sasahara A. · Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 604 · 10610.1016/j.susc.2009.10.025 ↗
19. Marquet P. · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 961210.1021/la100193w ↗
20. Fukuma T. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2007 · 98 · 10610110.1103/PhysRevLett.98.106101 ↗
21. Fukuma T. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 104 · 01610110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.016101 ↗
22. Voïtchovsky K. · Nat. Nanotechnol. · 2010 · 5 · 40110.1038/nnano.2010.67 ↗
23. Zakeeruddin S. M. · Langmuir · 2002 · 18 · 95210.1021/la0110848 ↗
24. Wang P. · Nat. Mater. · 2003 · 2 · 40210.1038/nmat904 ↗
25. Rodahl M. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 1995 · 66 · 392410.1063/1.1145396 ↗
26. Rodahl M. · Sens. Actuators, B · 1996 · 37 · 11110.1016/S0925-4005(97)80077-9 ↗
27. Harms H. A. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2012 · 903710.1039/c2cp41268c ↗
28. Voïtchovsky K. · Phys. Rev. E · 2013 · 88 · 02240710.1103/PhysRevE.88.022407 ↗
29. Cornell W. D. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1995 · 117 · 517910.1021/ja00124a002 ↗
30. Bandura A. V. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2003 · 107 · 1107210.1021/jp034093t ↗
31. Case, D. A.; Darden, T. A.; Cheatham, T. E., III; Simmerling, C. L.AMBER 12—Amber Package.University of California 2012.
32. Bayly C. I. · J. Phys. Chem. · 1993 · 97 · 1026910.1021/j100142a004 ↗
33. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.Gaussian 09, revision A. 1.Gaussian Inc.:Wallingford, CT, 2009.
34. Sushko M. L. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 485310.1021/jp055486q ↗
35. Jorgensen W. L. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 1988 · 110 · 165710.1021/ja00214a001 ↗
36. Pastore M. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 3 · 214610.1021/jz300839e ↗
37. Grinter D. C. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2012 · 116 · 1164310.1021/jp303514g ↗
38. Polander L. E. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2013 · 52 · 873110.1002/anie.201304608 ↗
39. Discovery Studio Modeling Environment, release 4.0;Accelrys Software, Inc.:San Diego, 2013.
40. Tétreault N. · ECS Trans. · 2011 · 41 · 30310.1149/1.3633681 ↗
41. Yanada K. · Electrochim. Acta · 2012 · 79 · 163
42. Chiba K. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2011 · 158 · A132010.1149/2.038112jes ↗
43. Hahlin M. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2010 · 12 · 150710.1039/b913548k ↗
44. Schwartz D. K. · Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. · 2001 · 52 · 10710.1146/annurev.physchem.52.1.107 ↗
45. O’Regan B. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 720310.1039/c2ee21341a ↗
46. Gusak V. · Nano Lett. · 2012 · 12 · 239710.1021/nl3003842 ↗
47. Gusak V. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 1711610.1021/jp5015274 ↗