High Efficiency Air-Processed Dithienogermole-Based Polymer Solar Cells
Source abstract
Abstract
The effect of air processing, with air exposure varying from minutes to hours prior to encapsulation, on photovoltaic device performance has been studied through a series of electrical characterizations and optical simulations for a donor/acceptor polymer-based organic solar cell based on poly(dithienogermole-alt-thienopyrrolodione) p(DTG-TPD)/PC71BM blends. A ∼10% degradation in power conversion efficiency was observed due to air processing with 10 min exposure time, with AM1.5 power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) decreasing from 8.5 ± 0.25% for devices processed in inert nitrogen atmosphere to 7.7 ± 0.18% for devices processed in ambient air. After 3 h air exposure, the PCE leveled off at 7.04 ± 0.1%. This decrease is attributed partially to interface issues caused by exposure of the electrode materials to oxygen and water and partially to a degradation of the hole transport in the active layer.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States
School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Center for Organic Photonics and Electronics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States
Funding
Florida Energy Systems Consortium · Office of Naval Research
References (44)
Show source-provided references
1. Darling S. B. · RSC Adv. · 2013 · 3 · 1763310.1039/c3ra42989j ↗
2. Kaltenbrunner M. · Nat. Commun. · 2012 · 3 · 77010.1038/ncomms1772 ↗
3. Liao S.-H. · Adv. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 476610.1002/adma.201301476 ↗
4. Chen J.-D. · Adv. Mater. · 2015 · 27 · 103510.1002/adma.201404535 ↗
5. Kan B. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2014 · 136 · 1552910.1021/ja509703k ↗
6. Facchetti A. · Mater. Today · 2013 · 16 · 12310.1016/j.mattod.2013.04.005 ↗
7. Krebs F. C. · J. Mater. Chem. · 2009 · 19 · 544210.1039/b823001c ↗
8. Søndergaard R. R. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 2013 · 51 · 1610.1002/polb.23192 ↗
9. Krebs F. C. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2009 · 93 · 39410.1016/j.solmat.2008.10.004 ↗
10. Søndergaard R. · Mater. Today · 2012 · 15 · 3610.1016/S1369-7021(12)70019-6 ↗
11. You J. · Nat. Commun. · 2013 · 4 · 144610.1038/ncomms2411 ↗
12. Betancur R. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2011 · 95 · 73510.1016/j.solmat.2010.10.014 ↗
13. Bovill E. S. R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2013 · 102 · 18330310.1063/1.4804294 ↗
14. Wu S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 2187310.1021/jp108886p ↗
15. Wu Q. · J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. · 2014 · 52 · 151110.1002/polb.23605 ↗
16. Abdou M. S. A. · Adv. Mater. · 1994 · 6 · 83810.1002/adma.19940061106 ↗
17. Bellani S. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2014 · 118 · 629110.1021/jp4119309 ↗
18. Angmo D. · Org. Electron. · 2013 · 14 · 98410.1016/j.orgel.2012.12.033 ↗
19. Kakavelakis G. · Chem. Commun. · 2014 · 50 · 528510.1039/C3CC49004A ↗
20. Mateker W. R. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 252910.1039/c3ee41328d ↗
21. Alem S. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2012 · 4 · 299310.1021/am300362b ↗
22. Razzell-Hollis J. · J. Mater. Chem. A · 2014 · 2 · 2018910.1039/C4TA05641H ↗
23. Soon Y. W. · Chem. Commun. · 2013 · 49 · 129110.1039/c2cc38243a ↗
24. Small C. E. · Nat. Photon. · 2012 · 6 · 11510.1038/nphoton.2011.317 ↗
25. Small C. E. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2013 · 3 · 90910.1002/aenm.201201114 ↗
26. Amb C. M. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2011 · 133 · 1006210.1021/ja204056m ↗
27. Nam C.-Y. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2009 · 19 · 355210.1002/adfm.200900311 ↗
28. Hoppe H. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2003 · 80 · 10510.1016/S0927-0248(03)00137-5 ↗
29. Yang L. · Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells · 2010 · 94 · 183110.1016/j.solmat.2010.05.043 ↗
30. Głowacki E. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2011 · 99 · 04330510.1063/1.3615799 ↗
31. Pandey R. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2012 · 100 · 08330310.1063/1.3686909 ↗
32. Park S. H. · Nat. Photon. · 2009 · 3 · 29710.1038/nphoton.2009.69 ↗
33. Chen S. · Adv. Energy Mater. · 2011 · 1 · 96310.1002/aenm.201100300 ↗
34. Mihailetchi V. D. · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2005 · 94 · 12660210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.126602 ↗
35. Nicolai H. T. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 88210.1038/nmat3384 ↗
36. Anthopoulos T. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2007 · 90 · 12210510.1063/1.2715028 ↗
37. Zhuo J.-M. · Adv. Mater. · 2009 · 21 · 474710.1002/adma.200901120 ↗
38. Chen W. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 804510.1039/c2ee22056c ↗
39. Chen K.-S. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2012 · 5 · 955110.1039/c2ee22623e ↗
40. Hoppe H. · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 451 · 58910.1016/j.tsf.2003.11.173 ↗
41. Pettersson L. A. A. · J. Appl. Phys. · 1999 · 86 · 48710.1063/1.370757 ↗
42. Tammer M. · Adv. Mater. · 2002 · 14 · 21010.1002/1521-4095(20020205)14:3<210::AID-ADMA210>3.0.CO;2-2 ↗
43. Myers J. D. · Org. Electron. · 2009 · 10 · 118210.1016/j.orgel.2009.05.023 ↗
44. Dibb G. F. A. · Sci. Rep. · 2013 · 3 · 333510.1038/srep03335 ↗