Light-Stable Methylammonium-Free Inverted Flexible Perovskite Solar Modules on PET Exceeding 10.5% on a 15.7 cm2 Active Area
Source abstract
Abstract
Perovskite solar modules (PSMs) have been attracting the photovoltaic market, owing to low manufacturing costs and process versatility. The employment of flexible substrates gives the chance to explore new applications and further increase the fabrication throughput. However, the present state-of-the-art of flexible perovskite solar modules (FPSMs) does not show any data on light-soaking stability, revealing that the scientific community is still far from the potential marketing of the product. During this work, we demonstrate, for the first time, an outstanding light stability of FPSMs over 1000 h considering the recovering time (T80 = 730 h), exhibiting a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 10.51% over a 15.7 cm2 active area obtained with scalable processes by exploiting blade deposition of a transporting layer and a stable double-cation perovskite (cesium and formamidinium, CsFA) absorber.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties · Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Hybrid and Organic Solar Energy (CHOSE), Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome 00133, Italy
Saule Technologies, Wroclaw 54-427, Poland
Saule Research Institute, Wroclaw 54-427, Poland
Institute for Structure of the Matter—National Research Council (ISM−CNR), via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, Rome 00133, Italy
Funding
European Union???s Horizon 2020 Framework Program for funding Research and Innovation
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1126/science.125405010.1126/science.1254050 ↗
2. 10.1002/pip.330310.1002/pip.3303 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20130628110.1002/adma.201306281 ↗
4. 10.1039/C4TA05246C10.1039/C4TA05246C ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0010710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00107 ↗
6. 10.1039/C6EE01137C10.1039/C6EE01137C ↗
7. 10.1088/2058-8585/ab556e10.1088/2058-8585/ab556e ↗
8. 10.1016/j.mattod.2020.05.00210.1016/j.mattod.2020.05.002 ↗
9. 10.1002/solr.20190014410.1002/solr.201900144 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.cap.2020.03.00710.1016/j.cap.2020.03.007 ↗
11. 10.1039/c3cc46534a10.1039/c3cc46534a ↗
12. 10.1038/ncomms841010.1038/ncomms8410 ↗
13. 10.1039/D0EE02164D10.1039/D0EE02164D ↗
14. 10.1002/solr.20190055610.1002/solr.201900556 ↗
15. 10.1002/anie.20180978110.1002/anie.201809781 ↗
16. 10.1002/aenm.20190141910.1002/aenm.201901419 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.03710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.037 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0070210.1021/acsaem.0c00702 ↗
19. 10.1002/adfm.20200435710.1002/adfm.202004357 ↗
20. 10.1038/s41467-018-07099-910.1038/s41467-018-07099-9 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.06.01110.1016/j.joule.2019.06.011 ↗
22. 10.1002/aenm.20140180810.1002/aenm.201401808 ↗
23. 10.3390/mi802005510.3390/mi8020055 ↗
24. 10.1088/1361-6463/ab4f0710.1088/1361-6463/ab4f07 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.06510.1016/j.nanoen.2016.10.065 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41598-017-18970-y10.1038/s41598-017-18970-y ↗
27. 10.1007/s12274-017-1896-510.1007/s12274-017-1896-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.05610.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.056 ↗
29. 10.1021/acsaem.1c0014010.1021/acsaem.1c00140 ↗
30. 10.1021/acsami.8b0262410.1021/acsami.8b02624 ↗
31. 10.1002/solr.20200029210.1002/solr.202000292 ↗
32. 10.1039/D0TA12067G10.1039/D0TA12067G ↗
33. 10.1002/adfm.20190262910.1002/adfm.201902629 ↗
34. 10.1002/aenm.20190348710.1002/aenm.201903487 ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20190310810.1002/aenm.201903108 ↗
36. 10.1039/C8EE01799A10.1039/C8EE01799A ↗
37. 10.1038/natrevmats.2018.1710.1038/natrevmats.2018.17 ↗
38. Matteocci F. · 2019 · 12110.1002/9781119580546.ch3 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.scib.2020.02.02310.1016/j.scib.2020.02.023 ↗
40. 10.1002/eem2.1211810.1002/eem2.12118 ↗
41. 10.1021/acsami.9b0573010.1021/acsami.9b05730 ↗
42. 10.1038/s41560-019-0529-510.1038/s41560-019-0529-5 ↗
43. 10.1039/D0CS00573H10.1039/D0CS00573H ↗
44. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.00310.1016/j.rser.2017.04.003 ↗
45. 10.1039/C8TA06950F10.1039/C8TA06950F ↗
46. 10.1126/science.aat358310.1126/science.aat3583 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14559610.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145596 ↗
48. 10.1002/adma.20190550210.1002/adma.201905502 ↗
49. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0061310.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00613 ↗
50. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b0032310.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00323 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsami.7b1526310.1021/acsami.7b15263 ↗
52. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0468410.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04684 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0087110.1021/acsenergylett.0c00871 ↗
54. 10.1002/adma.20160418610.1002/adma.201604186 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsami.0c1892010.1021/acsami.0c18920 ↗
56. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0149810.1021/acsenergylett.8b01498 ↗
57. 10.1088/2515-7655/ab707710.1088/2515-7655/ab7077 ↗
58. Pescetelli, S.; Agresti, A.; Razza, S.; Castriotta, L. A.; Di Carlo, A. In Large Area Perovskite Solar Modules with Improved Efficiency and Stability, International Symposium on Advanced Electrical and Communication Technologies (ISAECT), IEEE, 2019; pp 1–5.10.1109/ISAECT47714.2019.9069679 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10568510.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105685 ↗
60. 10.1002/solr.20210007310.1002/solr.202100073 ↗
61. 10.1021/acsami.8b1539610.1021/acsami.8b15396 ↗
62. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3810.1038/nenergy.2017.38 ↗
63. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0236310.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02363 ↗
64. 10.1039/C6TA05209F10.1039/C6TA05209F ↗
65. 10.1039/C6EE03352K10.1039/C6EE03352K ↗
66. 10.1021/acsaem.7b0025610.1021/acsaem.7b00256 ↗