journal article·2013-08-14

Investigation of the Interfaces in Schottky Diodes Using Equivalent Circuit Models

Chanyoung Yim, Niall McEvoy, Hye-Young Kim, Ehsan Rezvani, Georg S. Duesberg

Publisher page

Abstract

The metal-semiconductor contact is one of the most critical factors that determine the performance of semiconductor devices such as Schottky barrier diodes (SBDs). SBDs between conductive carbon thin films and silicon have attracted attention due to their high performance and potential low cost of fabrication. Here, we introduce impedance spectroscopy (IS) as a powerful technique to characterize such SBDs. The electrical and structural characteristics of carbon-silicon SBDs between silicon and two different types of conductive carbon thin films have been investigated. Modeling the data with an extended equivalent circuit model reveals the effects of the metal electrode contacts of SBDs for the first time. From dc current-voltage measurements, diode parameters including the ideality factor, the Schottky barrier height, and the series resistance are extracted. Through use of analysis with IS, additional information on the Schottky contact is obtained, such as the built-in potential and more reliable barrier height values. Thus, IS can be utilized to analyze interfaces between metals and semiconductors in great detail by electrical means.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemistry and ‡Centre for Research on Adaptive Nanostructures and Nanodevices (CRANN), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, 2, Ireland

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Rhoderick E. H. · IEE Proc. · 1982 · 129 · 110.1049/ip-d.1982.0001 ↗
2. Sze, S. M.; Ng, K. K.Physics of Semiconductor Devices,3rd ed.John Wiley & Sons, Inc.:Hoboken, NJ, 2007; pp134–196.
3. Auret F. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1986 · 48 · 13010.1063/1.96973 ↗
4. Wang C. D. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1998 · 72 · 121110.1063/1.121016 ↗
5. Card H. C. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 1971 · 4 · 158910.1088/0022-3727/4/10/319 ↗
6. Macdonald J. R. · 2005 · 1
7. Jonda C. · Chem. Mater. · 1999 · 11 · 242910.1021/cm991024b ↗
8. Huang J. · Measurement · 2010 · 43 · 29510.1016/j.measurement.2009.11.001 ↗
9. Chen C.-C. · Org. Electron. · 2010 · 11 · 190110.1016/j.orgel.2010.09.005 ↗
10. Reddy V. S. · J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2007 · 40 · 768710.1088/0022-3727/40/24/015 ↗
11. Huang W. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 01330810.1063/1.2831661 ↗
12. Agarwal P. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 1995 · 142 · 414910.1149/1.2048478 ↗
13. Okutan M. · Microelectron. Eng. · 2008 · 85 · 64610.1016/j.mee.2007.11.011 ↗
14. Yim C. Y. · J. Korean Phys. Soc. · 2006 · 48 · 1565
15. Huh J. · ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2011 · 3 · 309710.1021/am2006096 ↗
16. Schreiber M. · Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2010 · 256 · 618610.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.138 ↗
17. McEvoy N. · Carbon · 2012 · 50 · 121610.1016/j.carbon.2011.10.036 ↗
18. Graham A. P. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2010 · 107
19. Kreupl F. · 2011 · 1303 · 3
20. Graham A. P. · J. Appl. Phys. · 2012 · 111 · 12451110.1063/1.4725429 ↗
21. Yim C. · Small · 2012 · 8 · 136010.1002/smll.201101996 ↗
22. López-Honorato E. · Carbon · 2009 · 47 · 39610.1016/j.carbon.2008.10.023 ↗
23. Rhoderick, E. H.; Williams, R. H.Metal–Semiconductor Contacts,2nd ed.Clarendon Press:Oxford, 1988; pp90–109.
24. Cheung S. K. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1986 · 49 · 8510.1063/1.97359 ↗
25. Kavasoglu A. S. · Solid-State Electron. · 2008 · 52 · 99010.1016/j.sse.2008.02.004 ↗
26. Hacke P. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 1993 · 63 · 267610.1063/1.110417 ↗