Reproducible, High Performance Fully Printed Photodiodes on Flexible Substrates through the Use of a Polyethylenimine Interlayer
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper investigates with a statistical analysis the issue of performance reproducibility and optimization in fully inkjet-printed organic photodetectors on flexible substrates. The most crucial process step to obtain reproducible, well performing devices with a high process yield turns out to be the printing of the thin polyethylenimine interlayer used as a surface modifier for the bottom electrode. Controlling solution composition and deposition parameters for this layer, a 57 nA cm–2 mean reverse dark current was achieved, with an outstanding standard deviation as low as 15 nA cm–2, with dramatic improvements in process yield (from less than 20% to over 90%). Device performance in terms of dark currents, EQE (from 50% up to 90% at 525 nm, depending on process), and rectification (ratio between forward current and reverse current over 104 and reaching 105 in the best cases) is among the best for fully printed detectors. Furthermore, the importance of relative humidity control in the deposition environment during the interlayer printing on device characteristics is reported, indicating the processing conditions optimal for scaling to mass manufacturing. The overall interlayer optimization approach was applied to a process using widely adopted materials in the organic optoelectronics field, and thus retains relevance on a broad range.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanomaterials and Printing Technologies · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Center for Nano Science and Technology @PoliMi, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Via Pascoli 70/3, 20133 Milano, Italy
Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, P.za L. da Vinci, 32, 20133 Milano, Italy
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/natrevmats.2016.10010.1038/natrevmats.2016.100 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20150540510.1002/adma.201505405 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20120497910.1002/adma.201204979 ↗
4. 10.1039/c2cs15313k10.1039/c2cs15313k ↗
5. 10.1021/jp502878810.1021/jp5028788 ↗
6. 10.1039/C7NR01604B10.1039/C7NR01604B ↗
7. 10.1088/2053-1613/1/01500210.1088/2053-1613/1/015002 ↗
8. 10.1126/sciadv.150185610.1126/sciadv.1501856 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11694-011-9120-x10.1007/s11694-011-9120-x ↗
10. 10.1038/srep3894110.1038/srep38941 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat132910.1038/nmat1329 ↗
12. 10.1002/adma.20130347310.1002/adma.201303473 ↗
13. 10.1002/adma.20150223810.1002/adma.201502238 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.orgel.2011.01.02310.1016/j.orgel.2011.01.023 ↗
15. 10.1002/aelm.20150010110.1002/aelm.201500101 ↗
16. 10.1002/adma.20140291810.1002/adma.201402918 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.05.02110.1016/j.orgel.2016.05.021 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.02.00910.1016/j.orgel.2018.02.009 ↗
19. Pierre A. · 2017 · 32.4.1
20. 10.1002/adom.20170110810.1002/adom.201701108 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.orgel.2013.06.02010.1016/j.orgel.2013.06.020 ↗
22. 10.1109/LPT.2014.235003510.1109/LPT.2014.2350035 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.121882910.1126/science.1218829 ↗
24. 10.1002/adfm.20130416310.1002/adfm.201304163 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.01010.1016/j.orgel.2015.03.010 ↗
26. 10.1016/0032-3861(93)90411-310.1016/0032-3861(93)90411-3 ↗
27. 10.3379/jmsjmag.15.S2_43510.3379/jmsjmag.15.S2_435 ↗
28. 10.1021/am507797410.1021/am5077974 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20100156210.1002/adfm.201001562 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20070085910.1002/adfm.200700859 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20090114110.1002/adma.200901141 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20140043210.1002/aenm.201400432 ↗
33. 10.1111/jace.1238510.1111/jace.12385 ↗
34. Olabisi O. · 1979
35. 10.1038/srep0132410.1038/srep01324 ↗