Reduced Fermi Level Pinning at Physisorptive Sites of Moire-MoS2/Metal Schottky Barriers
Source abstract
Abstract
Weaker Fermi level pinning (FLP) at the Schottky barriers of 2D semiconductors is electrically desirable as this would allow a minimizing of contact resistances, which presently limit device performances. Existing contacts on MoS2 have a strong FLP with a small pinning factor of only ∼0.1. Here, we show that Moire interfaces can stabilize physisorptive sites at the Schottky barriers with a much weaker interaction without significantly lengthening the bonds. This increases the pinning factor up to ∼0.37 and greatly reduces the n-type Schottky barrier height to ∼0.2 eV for certain metals such as In and Ag, which can have physisorptive sites. This then accounts for the low contact resistance of these metals as seen experimentally. Such physisorptive interfaces can be extended to similar systems to better control SBHs in highly scaled 2D devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Graphene research and applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FA, U.K.
School of Electrical Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China
Funding
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nmat445210.1038/nmat4452 ↗
2. 10.1039/c7cs00828g10.1039/c7cs00828g ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0164610.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01646 ↗
4. 10.1038/s41586-019-1052-310.1038/s41586-019-1052-3 ↗
5. 10.1038/s41586-021-03472-910.1038/s41586-021-03472-9 ↗
6. 10.1038/s41586-018-0129-810.1038/s41586-018-0129-8 ↗
7. 10.1116/1.59147210.1116/1.591472 ↗
8. 10.1116/1.481842610.1116/1.4818426 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.170295210.1063/1.1702952 ↗
10. 10.1103/physrevlett.58.126010.1103/physrevlett.58.1260 ↗
11. 10.1103/physrevlett.52.46510.1103/physrevlett.52.465 ↗
12. 10.1021/nl303583v10.1021/nl303583v ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.6b0027510.1021/acsami.6b00275 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.0c2247610.1021/acsami.0c22476 ↗
15. 10.1021/nl403465v10.1021/nl403465v ↗
16. 10.1021/acsami.5b0689710.1021/acsami.5b06897 ↗
17. 10.1103/physrevx.4.03100510.1103/physrevx.4.031005 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0715910.1021/acsnano.6b07159 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0351510.1021/acsnano.0c03515 ↗
20. 10.1103/physrevlett.108.15680210.1103/physrevlett.108.156802 ↗
21. 10.1039/c8cp07880g10.1039/c8cp07880g ↗
22. 10.1021/acsami.1c1358310.1021/acsami.1c13583 ↗
23. 10.1063/5.004979210.1063/5.0049792 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsnano.8b0135410.1021/acsnano.8b01354 ↗
25. 10.1103/physrevb.93.08530410.1103/physrevb.93.085304 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467-021-21363-510.1038/s41467-021-21363-5 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c0056310.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00563 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.489143010.1063/1.4891430 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0147710.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01477 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.499106510.1063/1.4991065 ↗
31. 10.1103/physrevb.54.1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
32. 10.1103/physrevb.83.19513110.1103/physrevb.83.195131 ↗
33. 10.1103/physrevlett.102.07300510.1103/physrevlett.102.073005 ↗
34. 10.1103/physrevb.93.16542210.1103/physrevb.93.165422 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.32353910.1063/1.323539 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0295010.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02950 ↗
37. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0319910.1021/acsnano.5b03199 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.279047910.1063/1.2790479 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.511553510.1063/1.5115535 ↗
40. 10.1116/6.000016410.1116/6.0000164 ↗
41. O’Brien, K. P.; Dorow, C. J.; Penumatcha, A.; Maxey, K.; Lee, S.; Naylor, C. H.; Hsiao, A.; Holybee, B.; Rogan, C.; Adams, D.; Tronic, T.; Ma, S.; Oni, A.; Gupta, A. S.; Bristol, R.; Clendenning, S.; Metz, M.; Avci, U. Advancing 2D Monolayer CMOS through Contact, Channel and Interface Engineering. 2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting; IEEE: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2021; pp. 7.1.1–7.1.4.10.1109/IEDM19574.2021.9720651 ↗