Back-Channel Defect Termination by Sulfur for p-Channel Cu2O Thin-Film Transistors
Source abstract
Abstract
The absence of a high-performance p-channel oxide thin-film transistor (TFT) is the major challenge faced in the current oxide semiconductor device technology. Simple solution-based back-channel subgap defect termination using sulfur was developed for p-channel cuprous oxide (Cu2O)-TFTs. We investigated the origin of poor device characteristics in conventional Cu2O-TFTs and clarified that it was mainly because of a back-channel donor-like defect of ∼2.8 ×1013 cm–2 eV–1, which originated from the interstitial Cu defect. Sulfur ion treatment using thiourea effectively reduced the back-channel defect down to <3 × 1012 cm–2 eV–1 and demonstrated the Cu2O-TFT with a saturation mobility of 1.38 ± 0.7 cm2 V–1 s–1, a s-value of 2.35 ± 1.22 V decade–1, and an on/off current ratio of ∼4.1 × 106. The improvement of device characteristics was attributed to the reduction of back-channel defect by the formation of a thin CuSO4 back-channel passivation layer by the chemical reaction of interstitial Cu with S and O ions. An oxide-based complementary inverter using a p-channel Cu2O-TFT and a n-channel a-In–Ga–Zn–O-TFT was demonstrated with a high voltage gain of ∼230 at VDD = 70 V.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, 9500 German Dr., La Jolla, California 92093, United States
Materials Research Center for Element Strategy, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 4259 Nagatuta 4259, Midori, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20110322810.1002/adma.201103228 ↗
2. 10.1063/1.495303410.1063/1.4953034 ↗
3. 10.1002/adfm.20190463210.1002/adfm.201904632 ↗
4. 10.1038/nature0309010.1038/nature03090 ↗
5. Lee, J.h.; Kim, D.h.; Yang, D.j.; Hong, S.y.; Yoon, K.s.; Hong, P.s.; Jeong, C.o.; Park, H. S.; Kim, S. Y.; Lim, S. K. In 42.2: World’s Largest (15-inch) XGA AMLCD Panel using IGZO Oxide TFT. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers; Wiley Online Library, 2008; pp 625–628.10.1889/1.3069740 ↗
6. Jeong, J. K.; Jeong, J. H.; Choi, J. H.; Im, J. S.; Kim, S. H.; Yang, H. W.; Kang, K. N.; Kim, K. S.; Ahn, T. K.; Chung, H. J. In 3.1: Distinguished paper: 12.1-Inch WXGA AMOLED Display Driven by Indium-Gallium-Zinc Oxide TFTs Array. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers; Wiley Online Library, 2008; pp 1–4.10.1889/1.3069591 ↗
7. 10.1002/aelm.20180061710.1002/aelm.201800617 ↗
8. 10.1109/ted.2014.234046210.1109/ted.2014.2340462 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.513173310.1063/1.5131733 ↗
10. Wu, S. H.; Jia, X.; Kui, M.; Shuai, C. C.; Hsieh, T. Y.; Lin, H. C.; Chen, D.; Lin, C. B.; Wu, J.; Yew, T. In Extremely Low Power C-axis Aligned Crystalline In-Ga-Zn-O 60 nm Transistor Integrated with Industry 65 nm Si MOSFET for IoT Normally-off CPU Application. 2016 IEEE Symposium on VLSI Technology; IEEE, 2016; pp 1–2.
11. 10.1021/acsami.5b0008610.1021/acsami.5b00086 ↗
12. 10.1103/revmodphys.5.14110.1103/revmodphys.5.141 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.296419710.1063/1.2964197 ↗
14. 10.1016/s0022-0248(00)00437-110.1016/s0022-0248(00)00437-1 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.145025210.1063/1.1450252 ↗
16. 10.1149/1.139093810.1149/1.1390938 ↗
17. 10.1103/physrevb.66.07320210.1103/physrevb.66.073202 ↗
18. 10.1021/nn400852r10.1021/nn400852r ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.11.03810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.11.038 ↗
20. 10.1023/a:100469080954710.1023/a:1004690809547 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.06.06310.1016/j.mssp.2015.06.063 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10884810.1016/j.matdes.2020.108848 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.10910.1016/j.ceramint.2015.12.109 ↗
24. 10.1039/c5tc02384j10.1039/c5tc02384j ↗
25. 10.1109/jdt.2015.243275210.1109/jdt.2015.2432752 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.302653910.1063/1.3026539 ↗
27. 10.1002/pssa.20088179510.1002/pssa.200881795 ↗
28. 10.1109/led.2017.274806410.1109/led.2017.2748064 ↗
29. 10.1002/adfm.20140291010.1002/adfm.201402910 ↗
30. O’Keeffe M. · Am. Mineral. · 1978 · 63 · 180
31. 10.1016/j.vacuum.2005.01.01010.1016/j.vacuum.2005.01.010 ↗
32. 10.1103/physrevb.76.04520910.1103/physrevb.76.045209 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.345238310.1063/1.3452383 ↗
34. 10.1103/physrevb.79.03520510.1103/physrevb.79.035205 ↗
35. 10.1021/jz100962n10.1021/jz100962n ↗
36. 10.1116/1.476411010.1116/1.4764110 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.479406110.1063/1.4794061 ↗
38. 10.1021/acsami.0c0153010.1021/acsami.0c01530 ↗
39. 10.1109/ted.2011.214231310.1109/ted.2011.2142313 ↗
40. 10.1021/acsami.8b1039010.1021/acsami.8b10390 ↗
41. 10.1002/pssb.1968026010310.1002/pssb.19680260103 ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.9b1116110.1021/acsami.9b11161 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.03810.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.038 ↗
44. 10.1039/c5ta01108f10.1039/c5ta01108f ↗
45. 10.1016/0368-2048(92)80047-c10.1016/0368-2048(92)80047-c ↗
46. 10.1080/0026897720010196110.1080/00268977200101961 ↗
47. 10.1088/1361-648x/aa879910.1088/1361-648x/aa8799 ↗
48. Lewis G. N. · 1923
49. 10.1109/led.2018.287105310.1109/led.2018.2871053 ↗
50. 10.1063/1.365697410.1063/1.3656974 ↗