journal article·2018-09-12

Ultralow Defect Density at Sub-0.5 nm HfO2/SiGe Interfaces via Selective Oxygen Scavenging

Mahmut S. Kavrik, Emily Thomson, Evgueni Chagarov, Kechao Tang, Scott T. Ueda, Vincent Hou, Toshihiro Aoki, Moon Kim, Bernd Fruhberger, Yuan Taur, Paul C. McIntyre, Andrew C. Kummel

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 10· Issue 36
Publisher page

Abstract

The superior carrier mobility of SiGe alloys make them a highly desirable channel material in complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) transistors. Passivation of the SiGe surface and the associated minimization of interface defects between SiGe channels and high-k dielectrics continues to be a challenge for fabrication of high-performance SiGe CMOS. A primary source of interface defects is interfacial GeOx. This interfacial oxide can be decomposed using an oxygen-scavenging reactive gate metal, which nearly eliminates the interfacial oxides, thereby decreasing the amount of GeOx at the interface; the remaining ultrathin interlayer is consistent with a SiOx-rich interface. Density functional theory simulations demonstrate that a sub-0.5 nm thick SiOx-rich surface layer can produce an electrically passivated HfO2/SiGe interface. To form this SiOx-rich interlayer, metal gate stack designs including Al/HfO2/SiGe and Pd/Ti/TiN/nanolaminate (NL)/SiGe (NL: HfO2–Al2O3) were investigated. As compared to the control Ni-gated devices, those with Al/HfO2/SiGe gate stacks demonstrated more than an order of magnitude reduction in interface defect density with a sub-0.5 nm SiOx-rich interfacial layer. To further increase the oxide capacitance, the devices were fabricated with a Ti oxygen scavenging layer separated from the HfO2 by a conductive TiN diffusion barrier (remote scavenging). The Pd/Ti/TiN/NL/SiGe structures exhibited significant capacitance enhancement along with a reduction in interface defect density.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Materials Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, United States

Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, United States

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (TSMC), Hsinchu 300-78, Taiwan

Irvine Materials Research Institute, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States

Material Science and Engineering, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas 75080-3021, United States

Funding

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors 2.0 (ITRFS 2.0), 2015 https://www.semiconductors.org/clientuploads/Research_Technology/ITRS/2015/2_2015%20ITRS%202.0%20Herogeneous%20Integration.pdf.
2. 10.1149/06406.0337ecst10.1149/06406.0337ecst ↗
3. Hashemi, P.; Balakrishnan, K.; Engelmann, S. U.; Ott, J. A.; Khakifirooz, A.; Baraskar, A.; Hopstaken, M.; Newbury, J. S.; Chan, K. K.; Leobandung, E.; Mo, R. T.; Dae-Gyu, P. In First Demonstration of High-Ge-Content Strained-SiGe on Insulator PMOS FinFETs with High Hole Mobility and Aggressively Scaled Fin Dimensions and Gate Lengths for High-Performance Applications, IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2014; pp 16.1.1–16.1.4.10.1109/IEDM.2014.7047061 ↗
4. 10.1109/LED.2017.265448510.1109/LED.2017.2654485 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.206092710.1063/1.2060927 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0040-6090(00)00881-610.1016/S0040-6090(00)00881-6 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.164770310.1063/1.1647703 ↗
8. 10.1016/0039-6028(94)00746-210.1016/0039-6028(94)00746-2 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.34294510.1063/1.342945 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.200175710.1063/1.2001757 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.04110.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.041 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.10369410.1063/1.103694 ↗
13. 10.1021/ja409692c10.1021/ja409692c ↗
14. NIST. NIST Chemistry WebBook, SRD 69, 2017.
15. 10.1063/1.177663610.1063/1.1776636 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.348145310.1063/1.3481453 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.mee.2013.03.11510.1016/j.mee.2013.03.115 ↗
18. 10.1021/acsami.6b0333110.1021/acsami.6b03331 ↗
19. 10.1063/1.12403610.1063/1.124036 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.493757310.1063/1.4937573 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.12310.1016/j.apsusc.2016.01.123 ↗
22. Nicollian E. H. · 1982
23. 10.1109/TED.2012.219700010.1109/TED.2012.2197000 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.486610.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4866 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.494194710.1063/1.4941947 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.12510810.1103/PhysRevB.74.125108 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.492244710.1063/1.4922447 ↗
29. 10.1143/apex.2.07140410.1143/apex.2.071404 ↗
30. 10.1109/TED.2012.220525510.1109/TED.2012.2205255 ↗