journal article·2021-04-14

Maximizing Oxygen Evolution Performance on a Transparent NiFeOx/Ta3N5 Photoelectrode Fabricated on an Insulator

Yudai Kawase, Tomohiro Higashi, Masao Katayama, Kazunari Domen, Kazuhiro Takanabe

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 13· Issue 14
Publisher page

Abstract

A transparent Ta3N5 photoanode is a promising candidate for the front-side photoelectrode in a photoelectrochemical (PEC) cell with tandem configuration (tandem cell), which can potentially provide high solar-to-hydrogen (STH) energy conversion efficiency. This study focuses in particular on the semiconductor properties and interfacial design of transparent Ta3N5 photoanodes fabricated on insulating quartz substrates (Ta3N5/SiO2), typically the geometric area of 1 × 1 cm2 in contact with indium on its edge. This material utilizes the self-conductivity of Ta3N5 to make the PEC system operational, and the electrode would strongly reflect the intrinsic nature of Ta3N5 without a back contact that is commonly introduced. First, PEC measurements using acetonitrile (ACN)/H2O mixed solution were made to elucidate the intrinsic photoresponse in the presence of tris(2,2'-bipyridine)ruthenium(II) bis(hexafluorophosphate) (Ru(bpy)3(PF6)2) without water contact which avoids a multielectron-transfer oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and photoinduced self-oxidation. The potential difference between the onset potential of Ru2+ PEC oxidation by Ta3N5/SiO2 and the redox potential of Ru2+/3+ in the nonaqueous environment was about 0.7 V. While a stable photoanodic response was observed for Ta3N5/SiO2 in the nonaqueous phase, the addition of a small quantity of water into this nonaqueous system led to the immediate deactivation of Ta3N5/SiO2 photoanode under illumination by self-photooxidation to form TaOx at the solid/water interface. In aqueous phase, flatband potentials estimated from Mott-Schottky analysis varied with solution pH (constant potential against reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)). Photoelectrode modification by a transparent NiFeOx layer was attempted. The complete coverage of the Ta3N5 surface with transparent NiFeOx electrocatalysts, achieved by an optimized spin-coating protocol with controlled Ni-Fe precursors, allowed for the successful protection of Ta3N5 and demonstrated an extremely stable photocurrent for hours without any additional protective layers. The stability of the resultant NiFeOx/Ta3N5/SiO2 was limited not by Ta3N5 but mainly by a NiFeOx electrocatalyst due to Fe dissolution with time.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Perovskite Materials and Applications · Advanced Memory and Neural Computing

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemical System Engineering, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Environmental Science Center, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Research Initiative for Supra-Materials (RISM), Shinshu University, 4-17-1 Wakasato, Nagano, Japan

Office of University Professors, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan

Funding

New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization · Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0092010.1021/acsenergylett.8b00920 ↗
2. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0266210.1021/acscatal.7b02662 ↗
3. 10.1038/ncomms1323710.1038/ncomms13237 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.125830710.1126/science.1258307 ↗
5. 10.1021/cm402151810.1021/cm4021518 ↗
6. 10.1073/pnas.141429011110.1073/pnas.1414290111 ↗
7. 10.1038/3510460710.1038/35104607 ↗
8. 10.1038/238037a010.1038/238037a0 ↗
9. 10.1021/cr100232610.1021/cr1002326 ↗
10. 10.1021/jp027593f10.1021/jp027593f ↗
11. 10.1039/C5CP03645C10.1039/C5CP03645C ↗
12. 10.1039/C4CP05616G10.1039/C4CP05616G ↗
13. 10.1246/cl.2002.73610.1246/cl.2002.736 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.10.05510.1016/j.tsf.2010.10.055 ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20110296610.1002/adfm.201102966 ↗
16. 10.1039/C6SC02116F10.1039/C6SC02116F ↗
17. 10.1039/C5EE03802B10.1039/C5EE03802B ↗
18. 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.09.00610.1016/j.chempr.2016.09.006 ↗
19. 10.1002/anie.20181208110.1002/anie.201812081 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsami.8b2119410.1021/acsami.8b21194 ↗
21. 10.1002/cssc.20200039710.1002/cssc.202000397 ↗
22. 10.1007/s40243-016-0083-z10.1007/s40243-016-0083-z ↗
23. 10.1039/C9SE01319A10.1039/C9SE01319A ↗
24. 10.1039/D0EE00220H10.1039/D0EE00220H ↗
25. 10.1002/chem.20150074510.1002/chem.201500745 ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20120258210.1002/adma.201202582 ↗
27. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0440310.1021/acs.jpcc.7b04403 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.512299610.1063/1.5122996 ↗
29. 10.1021/acscatal.6b0050810.1021/acscatal.6b00508 ↗
30. Park J. · Nano Energy · 2020 · 76 · 10508910.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105089 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20180048610.1002/adma.201800486 ↗
32. 10.1021/cm302533s10.1021/cm302533s ↗
33. 10.1002/anie.20170011710.1002/anie.201700117 ↗
34. 10.1002/anie.20140469710.1002/anie.201404697 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.123363810.1126/science.1233638 ↗
36. 10.1002/anie.20200120410.1002/anie.202001204 ↗
37. 10.1038/ncomms356610.1038/ncomms3566 ↗
38. 10.1021/cm403482s10.1021/cm403482s ↗
39. 10.1002/chem.20160324610.1002/chem.201603246 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.478893010.1063/1.4788930 ↗
41. 10.1039/C5TA06983A10.1039/C5TA06983A ↗
42. 10.1021/j100144a03010.1021/j100144a030 ↗
43. 10.1016/0022-0728(95)03976-N10.1016/0022-0728(95)03976-N ↗
44. 10.1021/ja954172l10.1021/ja954172l ↗
45. 10.1021/ja101655210.1021/ja1016552 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.chempr.2017.03.00610.1016/j.chempr.2017.03.006 ↗
47. 10.1002/anie.20171212110.1002/anie.201712121 ↗