journal article·2020-04-15

Unraveling the Elastic Properties of (Quasi)Two-Dimensional Hybrid Perovskites: A Joint Experimental and Theoretical Study

Marcos A. Reyes-Martinez, Peng Tan, Arvin Kakekhani, Sayan Banerjee, Ayan A. Zhumekenov, Wei Peng, Osman M. Bakr, Andrew M. Rappe, Yueh-Lin Loo

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 12· Issue 15
Publisher page

Abstract

The unique properties of hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) promise to open doors to next-generation flexible optoelectronic devices. Before such advances are realized, a fundamental understanding of the mechanical properties of HOIPs is required. Here, we combine ab initio density functional theory (DFT) modeling with a diverse set of experiments to study the elastic properties of (quasi)2D HOIPs. Specifically, we focus on (quasi)2D single crystals of phenethylammonium methylammonium lead iodide, (PEA)2PbI4(MAPbI3)n−1, and their 3D counterpart, MAPbI3. We used nanoindentation (both Hertzian and Oliver–Pharr analyses) in combination with elastic buckling instability experiments to establish the out-of-plane and in-plane elastic moduli. The effect of Van der Waals (vdW) forces, different interlayer interactions, and finite temperature are combined with DFT calculations to accurately model the system. Our results reveal a nonmonotonic dependence of both the in-plane and out-of plane elastic moduli on the number of inorganic layers (n) rationalized by first-principles calculations. We discuss how the presence of defects in as-grown crystals and macroscopic interlayer deformations affect the mechanical response of (quasi)2D HOIPs. Comparing the in- and out-of-plane experimental results with the theory reveals that perturbations to the covalent and ionic bonds (which hold a 2D layer together) is responsible for the relative out-of-plane stiffness of these materials. In contrast, we conjecture that the in-plane softness originates from macroscopic or mesoscopic motions between 2D layers during buckling experiments. Additionally, we learn how dispersion and π interactions in organic bilayers can have a determining role in the elastic response of the materials, especially in the out-of-plane direction. The understanding gained by comparing ab initio and experimental techniques paves the way for rational design of layered HOIPs with mechanical properties favorable for strain–intensive applications. Combined with filters for other favorable criteria, e.g., thermal or moisture stability, one can systematically screen viable (quasi)2D HOIPs for a variety of flexible optoelectronic applications.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · 2D Materials and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544-5263, United States

Department of Chemistry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6323, United States

Department of Physics, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China

Physical Science and Engineering Division, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia

Funding

Intelligence Community Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program · King Abdullah University of Science and Technology · Office of Naval Research · Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation · China Scholarship Council · Division of Materials Research

References (64)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adma.20160022510.1002/adma.201600225 ↗
2. 10.1002/adma.20160558710.1002/adma.201605587 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20160496510.1002/adma.201604965 ↗
4. NREL. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart; 2019; https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/best-research-cell-efficiencies.20190923.pdf.
5. 10.1038/s41578-018-0065-010.1038/s41578-018-0065-0 ↗
6. 10.1021/jz400892a10.1021/jz400892a ↗
7. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.4210.1038/natrevmats.2017.42 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20150229410.1002/adma.201502294 ↗
9. 10.1021/jacs.5b1174010.1021/jacs.5b11740 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41467-018-07382-910.1038/s41467-018-07382-9 ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0084710.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00847 ↗
12. 10.1038/nature1830610.1038/nature18306 ↗
13. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b0305410.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03054 ↗
14. 10.1038/ncomms376110.1038/ncomms3761 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.488525610.1063/1.4885256 ↗
16. 10.1039/C5TA03331D10.1039/C5TA03331D ↗
17. 10.1557/mrc.2015.6910.1557/mrc.2015.69 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20160655610.1002/adma.201606556 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.eml.2016.06.00610.1016/j.eml.2016.06.006 ↗
20. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0591310.1021/acsnano.6b05913 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsami.8b0513810.1021/acsami.8b05138 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20160136910.1002/adma.201601369 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b0065910.1021/acsenergylett.6b00659 ↗
24. 10.1021/jacs.5b0379610.1021/jacs.5b03796 ↗
25. 10.1002/solr.20170021510.1002/solr.201700215 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.mprp.2018.12.07910.1016/j.mprp.2018.12.079 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0147510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01475 ↗
29. 10.1038/nmat117510.1038/nmat1175 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20120174910.1002/adma.201201749 ↗
31. 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/39550210.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.05310.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.053 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.122710.1103/PhysRevB.41.1227 ↗
35. 10.1039/C3CP54479F10.1039/C3CP54479F ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.69710.1103/PhysRevLett.50.697 ↗
37. 10.1038/sdata.2015.910.1038/sdata.2015.9 ↗
38. 10.1088/0953-8984/25/2/02580310.1088/0953-8984/25/2/025803 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.22410410.1103/PhysRevB.90.224104 ↗
40. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b0712910.1021/acs.jpcc.7b07129 ↗
41. 10.1088/0965-0393/7/6/30110.1088/0965-0393/7/6/301 ↗
42. 10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71495-X10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71495-X ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.000003310.1061/(ASCE)NM.2153-5477.0000033 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.09010.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.090 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.clay.2013.04.01310.1016/j.clay.2013.04.013 ↗
46. 10.1115/1.326129710.1115/1.3261297 ↗
47. 10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
48. 10.1039/c0cs00163e10.1039/c0cs00163e ↗
49. 10.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.01410.1016/j.actamat.2015.02.014 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.00410.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.004 ↗
51. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0156410.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01564 ↗
52. 10.1021/ct100641a10.1021/ct100641a ↗
53. 10.1063/1.508834210.1063/1.5088342 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.508729010.1063/1.5087290 ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0383210.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03832 ↗
56. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b0195210.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01952 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41563-018-0154-x10.1038/s41563-018-0154-x ↗
58. Pant, R.; Hu, L.; Zhang, G. Multiphysical Testing of Soils and Shales; Springer: 2013; pp 239–245.10.1007/978-3-642-32492-5_30 ↗
59. 10.1038/nmat90610.1038/nmat906 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0108210.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01082 ↗
61. 10.1039/C9QM00133F10.1039/C9QM00133F ↗
62. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.01360210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.013602 ↗
63. 10.1016/0008-6223(84)90010-110.1016/0008-6223(84)90010-1 ↗
64. 10.1038/nmat432210.1038/nmat4322 ↗