journal article·2017-07-19

Probing Interface Defects in Top-Gated MoS2 Transistors with Impedance Spectroscopy

Peng Zhao, Angelica Azcatl, Yuri Y. Gomeniuk, Pavel Bolshakov, Michael Schmidt, Stephen J. McDonnell, Christopher L. Hinkle, Paul K. Hurley, Robert M. Wallace, Chadwin D. Young

Publisher page

Abstract

The electronic properties of the HfO 2 /MoS 2 interface were investigated using multifrequency capacitance–voltage ( C – V ) and current–voltage characterization of top-gated MoS 2 metal–oxide–semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs). The analysis was performed on few layer (5–10) MoS 2 MOSFETs fabricated using photolithographic patterning with 13 and 8 nm HfO 2 gate oxide layers formed by atomic layer deposition after in-situ UV-O 3 surface functionalization. The impedance response of the HfO 2 /MoS 2 gate stack indicates the existence of specific defects at the interface, which exhibited either a frequency-dependent distortion similar to conventional Si MOSFETs with unpassivated silicon dangling bonds or a frequency dispersion over the entire voltage range corresponding to depletion of the HfO 2 /MoS 2 surface, consistent with interface traps distributed over a range of energy levels. The interface defects density ( D it ) was extracted from the C – V responses by the high–low frequency and the multiple-frequency extraction methods, where a D it peak value of 1.2 × 10 13 cm –2 eV –1 was extracted for a device (7-layer MoS 2 and 13 nm HfO 2 ) exhibiting a behavior approximating to a single trap response. The MoS 2 MOSFET with 4-layer MoS 2 and 8 nm HfO 2 gave D it values ranging from 2 × 10 11 to 2 × 10 13 cm –2 eV –1 across the energy range corresponding to depletion near the HfO 2 /MoS 2 interface. The gate current was below 10 –7 A/cm 2 across the full bias sweep for both samples indicating continuous HfO 2 films resulting from the combined UV ozone and HfO 2 deposition process. The results demonstrated that impedance spectroscopy applied to relatively simple top-gated transistor test structures provides an approach to investigate electrically active defects at the HfO 2 /MoS 2 interface and should be applicable to alternative TMD materials, surface treatments, and gate oxides as an interface defect metrology tool in the development of TMD-based MOSFETs.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, 800 W Campbell Rd., Richardson, Texas 75080, United States

Tyndall National Institute, Department of Chemistry, University of College Cork, Lee Maltings, Dyke Parade, Cork, Ireland

V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics, NAS of Ukraine, 41, pr. Nauki, Kyiv, Ukraine

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, United States

Funding

Science Foundation Ireland · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2012.19310.1038/nnano.2012.193 ↗
2. 10.1021/nn400280c10.1021/nn400280c ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2014.20710.1038/nnano.2014.207 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat368710.1038/nmat3687 ↗
5. 10.1038/nnano.2010.27910.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2013.3010.1038/nnano.2013.30 ↗
7. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.11531710.1103/PhysRevB.85.115317 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl303583v10.1021/nl303583v ↗
9. 10.1021/nl401831u10.1021/nl401831u ↗
10. 10.1038/ncomms201810.1038/ncomms2018 ↗
11. 10.1109/LED.2012.218452010.1109/LED.2012.2184520 ↗
12. 10.1021/nn405938z10.1021/nn405938z ↗
13. 10.1021/nl502557g10.1021/nl502557g ↗
14. 10.1021/nn501013c10.1021/nn501013c ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20150222210.1002/adma.201502222 ↗
16. 10.1021/nl301702r10.1021/nl301702r ↗
17. 10.1021/nl304777e10.1021/nl304777e ↗
18. 10.1038/ncomms408710.1038/ncomms4087 ↗
19. 10.1021/nn403248y10.1021/nn403248y ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.98.136805 ↗
21. 10.1021/nn404775u10.1021/nn404775u ↗
22. 10.1021/am303261c10.1021/am303261c ↗
23. 10.1039/C4TC01673D10.1039/C4TC01673D ↗
24. 10.1002/adma.20140200810.1002/adma.201402008 ↗
25. 10.1038/srep1192110.1038/srep11921 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.486914910.1063/1.4869149 ↗
27. 10.1088/2053-1583/2/1/01400410.1088/2053-1583/2/1/014004 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mee.2015.04.07810.1016/j.mee.2015.04.078 ↗
29. 10.1021/nn405916t10.1021/nn405916t ↗
30. 10.1021/nn506512j10.1021/nn506512j ↗
31. 10.1021/acsami.6b0156810.1021/acsami.6b01568 ↗
32. 10.1109/TNANO.2016.257028010.1109/TNANO.2016.2570280 ↗
33. Takenaka M. · IEEE Int. Electron Devices Meet. · 2016 · 139
34. 10.1088/0957-4484/26/10/10570910.1088/0957-4484/26/10/105709 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.494308010.1063/1.4943080 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.11808810.1063/1.118088 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.134389710.1063/1.1343897 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.159263910.1063/1.1592639 ↗
39. 10.1149/1.280617210.1149/1.2806172 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.236290510.1063/1.2362905 ↗
41. 10.1109/55.11916310.1109/55.119163 ↗
42. Schroder D. K. · 200510.1002/0471749095 ↗
43. 10.1039/C4NR06707J10.1039/C4NR06707J ↗
44. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0330910.1021/acsnano.5b03309 ↗
45. 10.1021/acsami.5b0177810.1021/acsami.5b01778 ↗
46. 10.1038/ncomms364210.1038/ncomms3642 ↗
47. 10.1038/ncomms629010.1038/ncomms6290 ↗
48. 10.1021/nl400747910.1021/nl4007479 ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.16540210.1103/PhysRevB.87.165402 ↗
50. 10.1021/nn202852j10.1021/nn202852j ↗
51. 10.1021/nl501659n10.1021/nl501659n ↗