journal article·2019-08-28Open access

Layer-Dependent Interfacial Transport and Optoelectrical Properties of MoS2 on Ultraflat Metals

Hao Lee, Sanchit Deshmukh, Jing Wen, Viviane Z. Costa, Joachim S. Schuder, Michael Sanchez, Andrew S. Ichimura, Eric Pop, Bin Wang, A. K. M. Newaz

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 34

Abstract

Layered materials based on transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) are promising for a wide range of electronic and optoelectronic devices. Realizing such practical applications often requires metal–TMD connections or contacts. Hence, a complete understanding of electronic band alignments and potential barrier heights governing the transport through metal–TMD junctions is critical. However, it is presently unclear how the energy bands of a TMD align while in contact with a metal as a function of the number of layers. In pursuit of removing this knowledge gap, we have performed conductive atomic force microscopy (CAFM) of few-layered (1 to 5 layers) MoS2 immobilized on ultraflat conducting Au surfaces [root-mean-square (rms) surface roughness < 0.2 nm] and indium–tin oxide (ITO) substrates (rms surface roughness < 0.7 nm) forming a vertical metal (CAFM tip)–semiconductor–metal device. We have observed that the current increases with the number of layers up to five layers. By applying Fowler–Nordheim tunneling theory, we have determined the barrier heights for different layers and observed how this barrier decreases as the number of layers increases. Using density functional theory calculations, we successfully demonstrated that the barrier height decreases as the layer number increases. By illuminating TMDs on a transparent ultraflat conducting ITO substrate, we observed a reduction in current when compared to the current measured in the dark, hence demonstrating negative photoconductivity. Our study provides a fundamental understanding of the local electronic and optoelectronic behaviors of the TMD–metal junction, which depends on the numbers of TMD layers and may pave an avenue toward developing nanoscale electronic devices with tailored layer-dependent transport properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Chemical, Biological and Materials Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, United States

Key Laboratory for Photonic and Electronic Bandgap Materials, Ministry of Education, School of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, P. R. China

Funding

Center for Computing for Life Sciences, San Francisco State University · Air Force Office of Scientific Research · Semiconductor Research Corporation · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems · Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation · National Science Foundation · Stanford Non-volatile Memory Technology Research Initiative

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2012.19310.1038/nnano.2012.193 ↗
2. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.28210.1038/nphoton.2015.282 ↗
3. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.27110.1038/nphoton.2014.271 ↗
4. 10.1039/c5cs00507h10.1039/c5cs00507h ↗
5. 10.1021/nn500064s10.1021/nn500064s ↗
6. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.3310.1038/natrevmats.2017.33 ↗
7. 10.1103/physrevlett.105.13680510.1103/physrevlett.105.136805 ↗
8. 10.1021/nl903868w10.1021/nl903868w ↗
9. 10.1021/nl504311p10.1021/nl504311p ↗
10. 10.1126/science.123554710.1126/science.1235547 ↗
11. 10.1038/srep0660810.1038/srep06608 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsami.7b1164110.1021/acsami.7b11641 ↗
13. 10.1038/nnano.2013.10010.1038/nnano.2013.100 ↗
14. 10.1038/nnano.2014.2510.1038/nnano.2014.25 ↗
15. 10.1021/nn403159y10.1021/nn403159y ↗
16. 10.1038/nnano.2014.2610.1038/nnano.2014.26 ↗
17. 10.1021/nl400516a10.1021/nl400516a ↗
18. 10.1021/nn305301b10.1021/nn305301b ↗
19. 10.1021/jz401199x10.1021/jz401199x ↗
20. 10.1021/nn202455710.1021/nn2024557 ↗
21. 10.1021/nn502776h10.1021/nn502776h ↗
22. 10.1021/nl401544y10.1021/nl401544y ↗
23. 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.01.00710.1016/j.nantod.2015.01.007 ↗
24. 10.1364/optica.2.00034710.1364/optica.2.000347 ↗
25. 10.1038/nnano.2015.7910.1038/nnano.2015.79 ↗
26. 10.1038/nnano.2015.7510.1038/nnano.2015.75 ↗
27. 10.1038/nnano.2015.6010.1038/nnano.2015.60 ↗
28. 10.1038/nnano.2015.6710.1038/nnano.2015.67 ↗
29. 10.1038/nature1429010.1038/nature14290 ↗
30. 10.1380/ejssnt.2017.11510.1380/ejssnt.2017.115 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.509343010.1063/1.5093430 ↗
32. 10.1016/0039-6028(93)91474-410.1016/0039-6028(93)91474-4 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.susc.2003.09.03910.1016/j.susc.2003.09.039 ↗
34. 10.1021/jp046678910.1021/jp0466789 ↗
35. 10.1021/la800265q10.1021/la800265q ↗
36. 10.1038/nnano.2010.17210.1038/nnano.2010.172 ↗
37. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0130910.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01309 ↗
38. Sze, S. M.; Ng, K. K. Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 3rd ed. Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, 2007; p 712.10.1002/0470068329 ↗
39. 10.1049/ip-i-1.1982.000110.1049/ip-i-1.1982.0001 ↗
40. 10.1021/nn506924j10.1021/nn506924j ↗
41. 10.1039/c5nr01044f10.1039/c5nr01044f ↗
42. 10.1021/acsami.7b1845410.1021/acsami.7b18454 ↗
43. 10.1063/1.496121110.1063/1.4961211 ↗
44. 10.1038/srep2178610.1038/srep21786 ↗
45. 10.1021/nl403465v10.1021/nl403465v ↗
46. 10.1021/nn500044q10.1021/nn500044q ↗
47. 10.1039/c7nr01501a10.1039/c7nr01501a ↗
48. 10.1103/physrevlett.113.16680110.1103/physrevlett.113.166801 ↗
49. 10.1088/1361-6528/aa8c2810.1088/1361-6528/aa8c28 ↗
50. 10.2478/s11534-011-0096-210.2478/s11534-011-0096-2 ↗
51. 10.1103/physrevb.54.1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
52. 10.1103/physrevlett.77.386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
53. 10.1103/physrevb.50.1795310.1103/physrevb.50.17953 ↗
54. 10.1103/physrevb.59.175810.1103/physrevb.59.1758 ↗
55. 10.1063/1.338234410.1063/1.3382344 ↗