journal article·2019-03-27Open access

Insights into the CO2 Stability-Performance Trade-Off of Antimony-Doped SrFeO3−δ Perovskite Cathode for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Yuqing Meng, Le Sun, Jun Gao, Wenzhou Tan, Chusheng Chen, Jianxin Yi, Henny J. M. Bouwmeester, Zhihu Sun, Kyle S. Brinkman

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 12

Abstract

One major challenge for the further development of solid oxide fuel cells is obtaining high-performance cathode materials with sufficient stability against reactions with CO2 present in the ambient atmosphere. However, the enhanced stability is often achieved by using material systems exhibiting decreased performance metrics. The phenomena underlying the performance and stability trade-off has not been well understood. This paper uses antimony-doped SrFeO3−δ as a model material to shed light on the relationship between the structure, stability, and performance of perovskite-structured oxides which are commonly used as cathode materials. X-ray absorption revealed that partial substitution of Fe by Sb leads to a series of changes in the local environment of the iron atom, such as a decrease in the iron oxidation state and increase in the oxygen coordination number. Theoretical calculations show that the structural changes are associated with an increase in both the oxygen vacancy formation energy and metal–oxygen bond energy. The area-specific resistance (ASR) of the perovskite oxide increases with Sb doping, indicating a deterioration of the oxygen reduction activity. Exposure of the materials to CO2 leads to depressed oxygen desorption and an increased ASR, which becomes less pronounced at higher Sb doping levels. Origin of the stability-performance trade-off is discussed based on the structural parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, United States

Electrochemistry Research Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, Enschede 7500 AE The Netherlands

National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230029, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Nuclear Energy University Programs · Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1039/c8ee01140k10.1039/c8ee01140k ↗
2. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.07510.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.075 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.10610.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.106 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2006.02.02110.1016/j.apcatb.2006.02.021 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2007.11.00710.1016/j.apcatb.2007.11.007 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep0032710.1038/srep00327 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.08810.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.06.088 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.01210.1016/j.memsci.2009.03.012 ↗
9. 10.1039/c5ta04598c10.1039/c5ta04598c ↗
10. 10.1021/cm303666v10.1021/cm303666v ↗
11. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.08.05310.1016/j.memsci.2011.08.053 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0005110.1021/acsaem.8b00051 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.02110.1016/j.desal.2009.02.021 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.05110.1016/j.memsci.2013.02.051 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.03010.1016/j.memsci.2011.10.030 ↗
16. 10.1021/cm101665r10.1021/cm101665r ↗
17. 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.02010.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.020 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ssi.2011.06.01110.1016/j.ssi.2011.06.011 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ssi.2014.09.00910.1016/j.ssi.2014.09.009 ↗
20. 10.1149/2.0441706jes10.1149/2.0441706jes ↗
21. 10.1002/cctc.20160033210.1002/cctc.201600332 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.01010.1016/j.apcatb.2015.02.010 ↗
23. 10.1016/s0376-7388(00)00337-910.1016/s0376-7388(00)00337-9 ↗
24. 10.1016/0167-2738(82)90045-510.1016/0167-2738(82)90045-5 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsami.5b0978010.1021/acsami.5b09780 ↗
26. 10.1021/acscatal.7b0346710.1021/acscatal.7b03467 ↗
27. 10.1107/s090904950501271910.1107/s0909049505012719 ↗
28. 10.1107/s090904950001696410.1107/s0909049500016964 ↗
29. 10.1103/physrevb.48.1311510.1103/physrevb.48.13115 ↗
30. 10.1103/physrevb.54.1116910.1103/physrevb.54.11169 ↗
31. 10.1002/adfm.20080152210.1002/adfm.200801522 ↗
32. 10.1016/s0167-2738(00)00770-010.1016/s0167-2738(00)00770-0 ↗
33. Anderson, J. R.; Boudart, M. Catalysis: Science and Technology; Springer Sci. Bus. Media: Berlin, 2012; pp 1–312.
34. 10.1016/s0022-3697(98)00246-710.1016/s0022-3697(98)00246-7 ↗
35. 10.1021/ja964352a10.1021/ja964352a ↗
36. 10.1107/s090904950002106310.1107/s0909049500021063 ↗
37. 10.1007/bf0120431910.1007/bf01204319 ↗
38. 10.1039/c1cs15218a10.1039/c1cs15218a ↗
39. 10.1103/physrevb.56.826510.1103/physrevb.56.8265 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.02610.1016/j.memsci.2012.03.026 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.02010.1016/j.electacta.2014.01.020 ↗
42. 10.1016/s0167-2738(01)00980-810.1016/s0167-2738(01)00980-8 ↗
43. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1952.tb13090.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1952.tb13090.x ↗
44. 10.1107/s056773947600155110.1107/s0567739476001551 ↗
45. 10.1006/jssc.1995.132010.1006/jssc.1995.1320 ↗