Reversible and Irreversible Responses of Defect-Engineered Graphene-Based Electrolyte-Gated pH Sensors
Source abstract
Abstract
We have studied the role of defects in electrolyte-gated graphene mesh (GM) field-effect transistors (FETs) by introducing engineered edge defects in graphene (Gr) channels. Compared with Gr-FETs, GM-FETs were characterized as having large increments of Dirac point shift (∼30-100 mV/pH) that even sometimes exceeded the Nernst limit (59 mV/pH) by means of electrostatic gating of H(+) ions. This feature was attributed to the defect-mediated chemisorptions of H(+) ions to the graphene edge, as supported by Raman measurements and observed cycling characteristics of the GM FETs. Although the H(+) ion binding to the defects increased the device response to pH change, this binding was found to be irreversible. However, the irreversible component showed relatively fast decay, almost disappearing after 5 cycles of exposure to solutions of decreasing pH value from 8.25 to 6.55. Similar behavior could be found in the Gr-FET, but the irreversible component of the response was much smaller. Finally, after complete passivation of the defects, both Gr-FETs and GM-FETs exhibited only reversible response to pH change, with similar magnitude in the range of 6-8 mV/pH.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Analytical Chemistry and Sensors · Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea
Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana−Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, United States
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea · Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/ja805090z10.1021/ja805090z ↗
2. 10.1088/0022-3727/43/34/34530310.1088/0022-3727/43/34/345303 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl100633g10.1021/nl100633g ↗
4. 10.1021/nl901596m10.1021/nl901596m ↗
5. 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70160-210.1016/S1369-7021(11)70160-2 ↗
6. 10.1039/C5NR00414D10.1039/C5NR00414D ↗
7. 10.1039/c1jm11436k10.1039/c1jm11436k ↗
8. 10.1021/nn103043v10.1021/nn103043v ↗
9. 10.1021/nn402702w10.1021/nn402702w ↗
10. 10.1039/C4RA08811E10.1039/C4RA08811E ↗
11. 10.1021/ja205693t10.1021/ja205693t ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2008.19910.1038/nnano.2008.199 ↗
13. 10.1021/nn304007x10.1021/nn304007x ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.02410.1016/j.ssc.2008.02.024 ↗
15. 10.1039/c3tc32264e10.1039/c3tc32264e ↗
16. Berger C. · Science · 2006 · 312 · 119110.1126/science.1125925 ↗
17. 10.1002/elan.20090057110.1002/elan.200900571 ↗
18. 10.1021/nl201332c10.1021/nl201332c ↗
19. 10.1021/jp409116r10.1021/jp409116r ↗
20. 10.1021/ac101519v10.1021/ac101519v ↗
21. 10.1021/nl100633g10.1021/nl100633g ↗
22. 10.1021/nl061228910.1021/nl0612289 ↗
23. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/18/18550410.1088/0957-4484/20/18/185504 ↗
24. 10.1021/nl803279t10.1021/nl803279t ↗
25. 10.1021/nl803363710.1021/nl8033637 ↗
26. 10.1038/nmat196710.1038/nmat1967 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.02110.1016/j.carbon.2011.09.021 ↗
28. 10.1038/nnano.2010.810.1038/nnano.2010.8 ↗
29. 10.1063/1.490660910.1063/1.4906609 ↗
30. 10.1021/ac301289510.1021/ac3012895 ↗
31. 10.1002/adma.20100043610.1002/adma.201000436 ↗
32. 10.1021/jz400940d10.1021/jz400940d ↗
33. 10.1038/nprot.2006.22710.1038/nprot.2006.227 ↗
34. 10.1016/0038-1101(94)00140-B10.1016/0038-1101(94)00140-B ↗
35. 10.1038/srep0069010.1038/srep00690 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.24680310.1103/PhysRevLett.99.246803 ↗
37. 10.1021/nn800459e10.1021/nn800459e ↗
38. 10.1038/srep0016610.1038/srep00166 ↗