journal article·2019-09-11

Isomerically Pure Benzothiophene-Incorporated Acceptor: Achieving Improved Voc and Jsc of Nonfullerene Organic Solar Cells via End Group Manipulation

Shao-Ling Chang, Kai-En Hung, Fong-Yi Cao, Kuo-Hsiu Huang, Chain-Shu Hsu, Chuang-Yi Liao, Chia-Hao Lee, Yen-Ju Cheng

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 11· Issue 36
Publisher page

Abstract

Benzene-based 1,1-dicyanomethylene-3-indanone (IC) derivatives have been widely utilized as the end-group to construct acceptor–donor–acceptor type nonfullerene acceptors (A–D–A type NFAs). The extension of the end-group conjugation of nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) is a rational strategy to facilitate intermolecular stacking of the end-groups which are responsible for efficient electron transportation. A bicyclic benzothiophene-based end-group acceptor, 2-(3-oxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[b]cyclopenta[d]thiophen-1-ylidene)malononitrile, denoted as α-BC was designed and synthesized. The Knoevenagel condensation of the unsymmetrical 1,3-diketo-precursor with one equivalent of malononitrile selectively reacts with the keto group attached at the α-position of the thiophene unit, leading to the isomerically pure benzothiophene-fused α-BC. The well-defined α-BC with extended conjugation was condensed with three different ladder-type diformylated donors to form three new A–D–A NFAs named BDCPDT-BC, DTCC-BC, and ITBC, respectively. The corresponding IC-based BDCPDT-IC, DTCC-IC, and ITIC model compounds were also synthesized for comparison. The incorporation of the electron-rich benzothiophene unit in the end-group upshifts the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital energy levels of the NFAs, which beneficially enlarges the Voc values. On the other hand, the benzothiophene unit in α-BC not also imparts an optical transition in the shorter wavelengths around 340–400 nm for a better light harvesting ability but also promotes the antiparallel π–π stacking of the end-groups for efficient electron transport. The organic photovoltaic cell devices using a PBDB-T polymer and BC-based NFAs all showed the improved Voc and Jsc values. The BDCPDT-BC- and DTCC-BC-based devices exhibited a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 10.82 and 10.74%, respectively, which outperformed the corresponding BDCPDT-IC-, and DTCC-IC-based devices (9.33 and 9.25%). More importantly, the ITBC-based device delivered the highest PCE of 12.07% with a Jsc of 19.90 mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.94 V, and an fill factor of 64.51%, representing a 14% improvement relative to the traditional ITIC-based device (10.05%).
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications · Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Raynergy Tek Incorporation, 2F, No. 60, Park Avenue 2, Hsinchu Science Park, Hsinchu 30844, Taiwan

Funding

Ministry of Education · Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan · Center for Interdisciplinary Science, National Chiao Tung University

References (57)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/cr900182s10.1021/cr900182s ↗
2. 10.1039/c8ee01150h10.1039/c8ee01150h ↗
3. 10.1039/c4cs00250d10.1039/c4cs00250d ↗
4. 10.1038/nenergy.2015.2710.1038/nenergy.2015.27 ↗
5. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0368810.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03688 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.9b0008310.1021/acsami.9b00083 ↗
7. 10.1039/c8ta04718a10.1039/c8ta04718a ↗
8. 10.1039/c7cs00892a10.1039/c7cs00892a ↗
9. 10.1038/natrevmats.2018.310.1038/natrevmats.2018.3 ↗
10. 10.1039/c8tc05577g10.1039/c8tc05577g ↗
11. 10.1021/acs.macromol.8b0233710.1021/acs.macromol.8b02337 ↗
12. 10.1039/c7ta10136h10.1039/c7ta10136h ↗
13. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0092810.1021/acsenergylett.8b00928 ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0377010.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03770 ↗
15. 10.1039/c8ta11441b10.1039/c8ta11441b ↗
16. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0211410.1021/acsenergylett.8b02114 ↗
17. 10.1002/aenm.20180354110.1002/aenm.201803541 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0398010.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03980 ↗
19. 10.1039/c8ta05920a10.1039/c8ta05920a ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20140431710.1002/adma.201404317 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20160028110.1002/adma.201600281 ↗
22. 10.1002/adma.20170397310.1002/adma.201703973 ↗
23. 10.1039/c8ta02534g10.1039/c8ta02534g ↗
24. 10.1002/aenm.20180365710.1002/aenm.201803657 ↗
25. 10.1039/c8ta12465e10.1039/c8ta12465e ↗
26. 10.1002/asia.20180166910.1002/asia.201801669 ↗
27. 10.1002/aenm.20180205010.1002/aenm.201802050 ↗
28. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0222210.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02222 ↗
29. 10.1002/aenm.20170283110.1002/aenm.201702831 ↗
30. 10.1021/jacs.6b1275510.1021/jacs.6b12755 ↗
31. 10.1002/solr.20180025010.1002/solr.201800250 ↗
32. 10.1039/c6ee00315j10.1039/c6ee00315j ↗
33. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.05.01110.1016/j.dyepig.2017.05.011 ↗
34. 10.1002/adma.20170212510.1002/adma.201702125 ↗
35. 10.1002/adma.20170352710.1002/adma.201703527 ↗
36. 10.1039/c9ta00114j10.1039/c9ta00114j ↗
37. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0082510.1021/acsenergylett.8b00825 ↗
38. 10.1039/c8ta07334a10.1039/c8ta07334a ↗
39. 10.1021/acsami.7b0541710.1021/acsami.7b05417 ↗
40. 10.1039/c8sc02018c10.1039/c8sc02018c ↗
41. 10.1039/c7ta05809h10.1039/c7ta05809h ↗
42. 10.1002/adma.20160277610.1002/adma.201602776 ↗
43. 10.1021/jacs.7b0267710.1021/jacs.7b02677 ↗
44. 10.1002/aenm.20170018310.1002/aenm.201700183 ↗
45. 10.1002/aenm.20170287010.1002/aenm.201702870 ↗
46. 10.1021/jacs.8b1365310.1021/jacs.8b13653 ↗
47. 10.1039/c7ta02486j10.1039/c7ta02486j ↗
48. 10.1039/c7ta10391c10.1039/c7ta10391c ↗
49. 10.1002/adma.20170025410.1002/adma.201700254 ↗
50. 10.1002/cjoc.20180047110.1002/cjoc.201800471 ↗
51. 10.1002/aenm.20180213110.1002/aenm.201802131 ↗
52. 10.1002/aenm.20140131510.1002/aenm.201401315 ↗
53. 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b0056310.1021/acsenergylett.8b00563 ↗
54. 10.1021/acsami.7b0665010.1021/acsami.7b06650 ↗
55. 10.1021/acsami.7b1261210.1021/acsami.7b12612 ↗
56. 10.1021/jp410075a10.1021/jp410075a ↗
57. 10.1016/j.tet.2011.06.09310.1016/j.tet.2011.06.093 ↗