journal article·2017-01-18

Strain Effects in Epitaxial VO2 Thin Films on Columnar Buffer-Layer TiO2/Al2O3 Virtual Substrates

Eric Breckenfeld, Heungsoo Kim, Katherine Burgess, Nicholas Charipar, Shu-Fan Cheng, Rhonda Stroud, Alberto Piqué

Publisher page

Abstract

Epitaxial VO 2 /TiO 2 thin film heterostructures were grown on (100) (m-cut) Al 2 O 3 substrates via pulsed laser deposition. We have demonstrated the ability to reduce the semiconductor–metal transition (SMT) temperature of VO 2 to ∼44 °C while retaining a 4 order of magnitude SMT using the TiO 2 buffer layer. A combination of electrical transport and X-ray diffraction reciprocal space mapping studies help examine the specific strain states of VO 2 /TiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 heterostructures as a function of TiO 2 film growth temperatures. Atomic force microscopy and transmission electron microscopy analyses show that the columnar microstructure present in TiO 2 buffer films is responsible for the partially strained VO 2 film behavior and subsequently favorable transport characteristics with a lower SMT temperature. Such findings are of crucial importance for both the technological implementation of the VO 2 system, where reduction of its SMT temperature is widely sought, as well as the broader complex oxide community, where greater understanding of the evolution of microstructure, strain, and functional properties is a high priority.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials · Ga2O3 and related materials · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue, Washington, D.C. 20375, United States

Nova Research, Inc., 1900 Elkin Street, Suite 230, Alexandria, Virginia 22308, United States

Funding

U.S. Naval Research Laboratory

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02556.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02556.x ↗
2. 10.1063/1.153494110.1063/1.1534941 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.9866710.1063/1.98667 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.245510.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2455 ↗
5. 10.1098/rspa.1949.009610.1098/rspa.1949.0096 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0022-0248(74)80055-210.1016/S0022-0248(74)80055-2 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.33907810.1063/1.339078 ↗
8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.245510.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2455 ↗
9. 10.1116/1.236275910.1116/1.2362759 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.163105510.1063/1.1631055 ↗
11. 10.1080/0141861990821429410.1080/01418619908214294 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.04.04810.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.04.048 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.06410110.1103/PhysRevB.83.064101 ↗
14. 10.1146/annurev.matsci.36.090804.09461310.1146/annurev.matsci.36.090804.094613 ↗
15. 10.1002/adma.20110116410.1002/adma.201101164 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.3.3410.1103/PhysRevLett.3.34 ↗
17. 10.1039/b205427m10.1039/b205427m ↗
18. 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.02.02610.1016/j.solmat.2009.02.026 ↗
19. 10.1038/srep0046610.1038/srep00466 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.08640210.1103/PhysRevLett.103.086402 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.24511410.1103/PhysRevB.79.245114 ↗
22. 10.1126/science.123051210.1126/science.1230512 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.482351110.1063/1.4823511 ↗
24. 10.1021/nl103925m10.1021/nl103925m ↗
25. 10.1038/nnano.2012.7010.1038/nnano.2012.70 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.144621510.1063/1.1446215 ↗
27. 10.1038/nphys273310.1038/nphys2733 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.17210610.1103/PhysRevB.74.172106 ↗
29. 10.1021/nl501480f10.1021/nl501480f ↗
30. 10.1063/1.486680610.1063/1.4866806 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tsf.2015.07.06210.1016/j.tsf.2015.07.062 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.01910.1016/j.actamat.2013.09.019 ↗
33. 10.1038/nnano.2009.26610.1038/nnano.2009.266 ↗
34. 10.1038/srep2639110.1038/srep26391 ↗
35. 10.1021/am401297g10.1021/am401297g ↗
36. 10.1021/am500135d10.1021/am500135d ↗
37. 10.1039/c3tc31653j10.1039/c3tc31653j ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.12541310.1103/PhysRevB.73.125413 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.275635910.1063/1.2756359 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.08.00310.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.08.003 ↗
41. 10.1063/1.238479810.1063/1.2384798 ↗