journal article·2017-03-29

Junction-Structure-Dependent Schottky Barrier Inhomogeneity and Device Ideality of Monolayer MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors

Byoung Hee Moon, Gang Hee Han, Hyun Kim, Homin Choi, Jung Jun Bae, Jaesu Kim, Youngjo Jin, Hye Yun Jeong, Min-Kyu Joo, Young Hee Lee, Seong Chu Lim

Publisher page

Abstract

Although monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) exhibit superior optical and electrical characteristics, their use in digital switching devices is limited by incomplete understanding of the metal contact. Comparative studies of Au top and edge contacts with monolayer MoS 2 reveal a temperature-dependent ideality factor and Schottky barrier height (SBH). The latter originates from inhomogeneities in MoS 2 caused by defects, charge puddles, and grain boundaries, which cause local variation in the work function at Au–MoS 2 junctions and thus different activation temperatures for thermionic emission. However, the effect of inhomogeneities due to impurities on the SBH varies with the junction structure. The weak Au–MoS 2 interaction in the top contact, which yields a higher SBH and ideality factor, is more affected by inhomogeneities than the strong interaction in the edge contact. Observed differences in the SBH and ideality factor in different junction structures clarify how the SBH and inhomogeneities can be controlled in devices containing TMD materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Graphene research and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Integrated Nanostructure Physics, Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea

Department of Energy Science, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea

Funding

Institute for Basic Science

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2012.19310.1038/nnano.2012.193 ↗
2. 10.1080/0001873690010130710.1080/00018736900101307 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2013.10010.1038/nnano.2013.100 ↗
4. 10.1038/nmat420510.1038/nmat4205 ↗
5. 10.1038/nnano.2010.27910.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
6. 10.1021/nn501013c10.1021/nn501013c ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20130584510.1002/adma.201305845 ↗
8. 10.1021/nn500044q10.1021/nn500044q ↗
9. 10.1021/nl303583v10.1021/nl303583v ↗
10. 10.1002/adma.20070168110.1002/adma.200701681 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.20531010.1103/PhysRevB.64.205310 ↗
12. 10.1116/1.58696810.1116/1.586968 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.489576710.1063/1.4895767 ↗
14. 10.1021/nn506512j10.1021/nn506512j ↗
15. 10.1021/nn303513c10.1021/nn303513c ↗
16. 10.1021/nl403465v10.1021/nl403465v ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.03100510.1103/PhysRevX.4.031005 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.15680210.1103/PhysRevLett.108.156802 ↗
19. 10.1021/nl303909f10.1021/nl303909f ↗
20. 10.1038/ncomms1042610.1038/ncomms10426 ↗
21. 10.1038/nnano.2010.17210.1038/nnano.2010.172 ↗
22. 10.1039/c3nr03220e10.1039/c3nr03220e ↗
23. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b0278810.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02788 ↗
24. 10.1021/nn301572c10.1021/nn301572c ↗
25. 10.1126/science.124435810.1126/science.1244358 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.349180410.1063/1.3491804 ↗
27. 10.1021/nn405916t10.1021/nn405916t ↗
28. 10.1109/EDL.1982.2550210.1109/EDL.1982.25502 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cap.2009.08.01210.1016/j.cap.2009.08.012 ↗
30. 10.1002/adfm.20060047510.1002/adfm.200600475 ↗
31. Henisch H. K. · 1984
32. 10.1063/1.36962710.1063/1.369627 ↗
33. 10.1039/C3NR03677D10.1039/C3NR03677D ↗
34. Sze S. M. · 200610.1002/0470068329 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.34973710.1063/1.349737 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.34724310.1063/1.347243 ↗
37. 10.1088/0957-4484/27/1/01520110.1088/0957-4484/27/1/015201 ↗
38. 10.1016/S0927-796X(01)00037-710.1016/S0927-796X(01)00037-7 ↗
39. 10.1088/0957-4484/25/37/37520110.1088/0957-4484/25/37/375201 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.482118510.1063/1.4821185 ↗
41. 10.1088/2053-1583/2/1/01500510.1088/2053-1583/2/1/015005 ↗
42. 10.3762/bjnano.5.3210.3762/bjnano.5.32 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0581810.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05818 ↗