Rational Design of Medium-Bandgap Perovskite Solar Cells for Triple-Junction Si Tandems
Source abstract
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Although perovskite-based triple-junction tandem solar cells have a higher theoretical maximum efficiency than the double-junction counterparts, their actual performances are not only far behind the theoretical one but also worse than the double-junction cells. One of the major issues limiting their performances is that the overall tandem current density is limited by the middle cell with a bandgap energy higher than the optimum value. In this study, we propose a comprehensive design rule of the middle cell specifically optimized for triple-tandem applications. We investigated the thickness effect of medium-bandgap perovskite and electron-transporting layers, especially focusing on the spectral responses to the filtered incident light in order to maximize the middle-cell photocurrent density and thus the overall tandem current density. This triple-tandem-specific designing of the middle cell leads to a high current density of 11 mA/cm 2 for the perovskite/perovskite/Si 3J tandem solar cell, and its conversion efficiency could be further increased to as high as 24.96% after additional interfacial defect passivation by PDAI 2 .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Seoul National University
Research Institute of Advanced Materials (RIAM)
Funding
National Research Foundation of Korea
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html. (accessed November 14, 2024).
2. 10.1063/1.173603410.1063/1.1736034 ↗
3. 10.1088/0022-3727/13/5/01810.1088/0022-3727/13/5/018 ↗
4. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c0010710.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00107 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.01.00710.1016/j.joule.2019.01.007 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0155610.1021/acsenergylett.2c01556 ↗
7. 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c0091910.1021/acsenergylett.3c00919 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20231159510.1002/adma.202311595 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.joule.2023.11.01810.1016/j.joule.2023.11.018 ↗
10. 10.1038/s41586-024-07226-110.1038/s41586-024-07226-1 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0118410.1021/acsenergylett.0c01184 ↗
12. 10.1038/s41586-023-06006-710.1038/s41586-023-06006-7 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41560-023-01406-510.1038/s41560-023-01406-5 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c0234010.1021/acsenergylett.2c02340 ↗
15. 10.1039/D3EE02822D10.1039/D3EE02822D ↗
16. 10.1039/D4SE01051E10.1039/D4SE01051E ↗
17. 10.1002/anie.20231337410.1002/anie.202313374 ↗
18. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0078010.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00780 ↗
19. 10.1039/D3EE03687A10.1039/D3EE03687A ↗
20. 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b0064710.1021/acsenergylett.7b00647 ↗
21. 10.1002/solr.20230088710.1002/solr.202300887 ↗
22. 10.1038/s41467-018-05760-x10.1038/s41467-018-05760-x ↗
23. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.01710.1016/j.joule.2018.11.017 ↗
24. 10.1002/solr.20220093010.1002/solr.202200930 ↗
25. 10.1039/D0EE01767A10.1039/D0EE01767A ↗
26. 10.1002/adma.20210563510.1002/adma.202105635 ↗
27. 10.1126/science.abj263710.1126/science.abj2637 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41566-022-00985-110.1038/s41566-022-00985-1 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41586-024-07997-710.1038/s41586-024-07997-7 ↗
30. 10.1038/s41586-022-05541-z10.1038/s41586-022-05541-z ↗
31. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c0236310.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02363 ↗
32. 10.1002/adom.20210078810.1002/adom.202100788 ↗
33. 10.1002/cssc.20210235010.1002/cssc.202102350 ↗
34. 10.1002/solr.20210029910.1002/solr.202100299 ↗
35. 10.1126/science.aba343310.1126/science.aba3433 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.joule.2022.08.00610.1016/j.joule.2022.08.006 ↗