journal article·2024-12-18Open access

Electrode Elastic Modulus as the Dominant Factor in the Capping Effect in Ferroelectric Hafnium Zirconium Oxide Thin Films

Megan K. Lenox, Md Rafiqul Islam, Md Shafkat Bin Hoque, Chloe H. Skidmore, Alejandro Salanova, Shelby S. Fields, Samantha T. Jaszewski, Jon-Paul Maria, Patrick E. Hopkins, Jon F. Ihlefeld

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 50

Abstract

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The discovery of ferroelectricity in hafnia based thin films has catalyzed significant research focused on understanding the ferroelectric property origins and means to increase stability of the ferroelectric phase. Prior studies have revealed that biaxial tensile stress via an electrode “capping effect” is a suspected ferroelectric phase stabilization mechanism. This effect is commonly reported to stem from a coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) incongruency between the hafnia and top electrode. Despite reported correlations between ferroelectric phase fraction and electrode CTE, the thick silicon substrate dominates the mechanics and CTE-related stresses, negating any dominant contribution from an electrode CTE mismatch toward the capping effect. In this work, these discrepancies are reconciled, and the origin of these differences deriving from electrode elastic modulus, not CTE, is demonstrated. Pt/ M /TaN/Hf 0.5 Zr 0.5 O 2 /TaN/Si devices, where M is platinum, TaN, iridium, tungsten, and ruthenium, were fabricated. Sin 2 (ψ)-based X-ray diffraction measurements of biaxial stress in the HZO layer reveal a strong correlation between biaxial stress, remanent polarization, and electrode elastic modulus. Conversely, a low correlation exists between the electrode CTE, HZO biaxial stress, and remanent polarization. A higher elastic modulus enhances the resistance to electrode elastic deformation, which intensifies the capping effect during crystallization, and culminates in the tandem restriction of out-of-plane hafnia volume expansion and preferential orientation of the polar c -axis normal to the plane. These behaviors concomitantly increase the ferroelectric phase stability and polarization magnitude. This work provides electrode material selection guidelines toward the development of high-performing ferroelectric hafnia into microelectronic devices, such as nonvolatile memories.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, United States

Department of Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States

Charles L. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, United States

Funding

Division of Chemistry · National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program · Army Research Office · Basic Energy Sciences · Division of Electrical, Communications and Cyber Systems · Sandia National Laboratories

References (68)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/d41586-018-06610-y10.1038/d41586-018-06610-y ↗
2. Decadel Plan for Semiconductors; Semiconductor Research Corporation, 2021. https://www.src.org/about/decadal-plan/decadal-plan-full-report.pdf (accessed August 13, 2024).
3. 10.1063/1.363405210.1063/1.3634052 ↗
4. 10.1063/1.508494510.1063/1.5084945 ↗
5. 10.1002/adma.20220490410.1002/adma.202204904 ↗
6. 10.1063/5.014806810.1063/5.0148068 ↗
7. 10.1038/s41928-020-00492-710.1038/s41928-020-00492-7 ↗
8. 10.1109/IEDM45741.2023.1041384810.1109/IEDM45741.2023.10413848 ↗
9. 10.1109/IRPS48228.2024.1052933610.1109/IRPS48228.2024.10529336 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.491913510.1063/1.4919135 ↗
11. 10.7567/JJAP.53.08LE0210.7567/JJAP.53.08LE02 ↗
12. 10.1002/aelm.20190030310.1002/aelm.201900303 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.495494210.1063/1.4954942 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.499561910.1063/1.4995619 ↗
15. 10.1126/sciadv.add595310.1126/sciadv.add5953 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7NR02121F10.1039/C7NR02121F ↗
17. 10.1063/1.491670710.1063/1.4916707 ↗
18. 10.1063/5.009312510.1063/5.0093125 ↗
19. 10.1109/TED.2022.319025610.1109/TED.2022.3190256 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.actamat.2022.11822010.1016/j.actamat.2022.118220 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0068010.1021/acsaelm.0c00680 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.14701410.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147014 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.491671510.1063/1.4916715 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.486600810.1063/1.4866008 ↗
25. 10.1002/aelm.20220060110.1002/aelm.202200601 ↗
26. 10.1021/acsaelm.9b0025610.1021/acsaelm.9b00256 ↗
27. 10.1002/adfm.20110311910.1002/adfm.201103119 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.mee.2015.04.02410.1016/j.mee.2015.04.024 ↗
29. 10.1063/5.012954610.1063/5.0129546 ↗
30. 10.1109/TED.2020.304617310.1109/TED.2020.3046173 ↗
31. 10.1109/LED.2018.284657010.1109/LED.2018.2846570 ↗
32. 10.1088/1361-6528/ad0f5210.1088/1361-6528/ad0f52 ↗
33. 10.1016/0040-6090(87)90366-X10.1016/0040-6090(87)90366-X ↗
34. 10.1063/1.34895810.1063/1.348958 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.37151410.1063/1.371514 ↗
36. 10.6028/jres.091.03710.6028/jres.091.037 ↗
37. 10.1107/S056773946800094X10.1107/S056773946800094X ↗
38. 10.1595/147106713X66503010.1595/147106713X665030 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.34577910.1063/1.345779 ↗
40. Lenox, M. K.; Skidmore, C. H.; Salanova, A.; Maria, J.P.; Ihlefeld, J. F. Temperature Dependent Lattice Parameters and Coefficient of Thermal Expansion for Tantalum Nitride, 2024.10.18130/V3/BUWWQB.10.18130/V3/BUWWQB ↗
41. 10.1063/5.004470210.1063/5.0044702 ↗
42. Esteves, G.; Ramos, K.; Fancher, C. M.; Jones, J. L. LIPRAS: Line-Profile Analysis Software, 2017.10.13140/RG.2.2.29970.25282/3.10.13140/RG.2.2.29970.25282/3 ↗
43. 10.1002/aelm.20240015110.1002/aelm.202400151 ↗
44. 10.1021/acsnano.3c0837110.1021/acsnano.3c08371 ↗
45. 10.1038/s41467-022-28236-510.1038/s41467-022-28236-5 ↗
46. 10.1021/acsami.0c0357010.1021/acsami.0c03570 ↗
47. 10.1002/aelm.20230001610.1002/aelm.202300016 ↗
48. 10.1002/pssr.20210008610.1002/pssr.202100086 ↗
49. 10.1063/5.016507210.1063/5.0165072 ↗
50. 10.1021/acsaelm.0c0018410.1021/acsaelm.0c00184 ↗
51. 10.1021/acsami.6b0358610.1021/acsami.6b03586 ↗
52. 10.1116/1.500255810.1116/1.5002558 ↗
53. 10.1002/admt.20230014610.1002/admt.202300146 ↗
54. 10.1063/1.489337610.1063/1.4893376 ↗
55. 10.6028/nbsscipaper.17110.6028/nbsscipaper.171 ↗
56. 10.1063/1.170938110.1063/1.1709381 ↗
57. 10.6028/jres.058.01110.6028/jres.058.011 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.tsf.2005.06.04810.1016/j.tsf.2005.06.048 ↗
59. 10.1063/1.325312710.1063/1.3253127 ↗
60. Corruccini R. J. · 1961
61. 10.1002/pssb.1963003120710.1002/pssb.19630031207 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.356974310.1063/1.3569743 ↗
63. Freund L. B. · 200410.1017/CBO9780511754715 ↗
64. 10.1107/S002188981300353110.1107/S0021889813003531 ↗
65. 10.1107/S160057752000077610.1107/S1600577520000776 ↗
66. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1977.tb14088.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1977.tb14088.x ↗
67. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.01610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.016 ↗
68. Birkholz M. · 200510.1002/3527607595 ↗