journal article·2024-08-14

NiOx Passivation in Perovskite Solar Cells: From Surface Reactivity to Device Performance

John Mohanraj, Bipasa Samanta, Osbel Almora, Renán Escalante, Lluis F. Marsal, Sandra Jenatsch, Arno Gadola, Beat Ruhstaller, Juan A. Anta, Maytal Caspary Toroker, Selina Olthof

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces· Volume 16· Issue 32
Publisher page

Abstract

Nonstoichiometric nickel oxide (NiO x ) is one of the very few metal oxides successfully used as hole extraction layer in p–i–n type perovskite solar cells (PSCs). Its favorable optoelectronic properties and facile large-scale preparation methods are potentially relevant for future commercialization of PSCs, though currently low operational stability of PSCs is reported when a NiO x hole extraction layer is used in direct contact with the perovskite absorber. Poorly understood degradation reactions at this interface are seen as cause for the inferior stability, and a variety of interface passivation approaches have been shown to be effective in improving the overall solar cell performance. To gain a better understanding of the processes happening at this interface, we systematically passivated specific defects on NiO x with three different categories of organic/inorganic compounds. The effects on NiO x and the perovskite (MAPbI 3 ) deposited on top were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Here, we find that the perovskite’s structural stability and film formation can be significantly affected by the passivation treatment of the NiO x surface. In combination with density functional theory (DFT) calculations, a likely origin of NiO x –perovskite degradation interactions is proposed. The surface passivated NiO x layers were incorporated into MAPbI 3 -based PSCs, and the influence on device performance and operational stability was investigated by current–voltage ( J – V ) characterization, impedance spectroscopy (IS), and open circuit voltage decay (OCVD) measurements. Interestingly, we find that a superior structural stability due to interface passivation must not relate to high operational stability. The discrepancy comes from the formation of excess ions at the interface, which negatively impacts all solar cell parameters.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Chemistry, University of Cologne, Greinstrasse 4-6, Cologne 50939, Germany

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Technion─Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3600003, Israel

Departament d’Enginyeria Electrònica Elèctrica i Automàtica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, 43007 Tarragona, Spain

Center for Nanoscience and Sustainable Technologies (CNATS), Department of Physical, Chemical, and Natural Systems, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Sevilla 41013, Spain

Fluxim AG, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 2, 8400 Winterthur, Switzerland

The Nancy and Stephen Grand Technion Energy Program, Technion─Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 3200003, Israel

Funding

Bundesamt f?r Energie · Technion-Israel Institute of Technology · European Regional Development Fund · Ministry of Energy, Israel · European Cooperation in Science and Technology · Agencia Estatal de Investigaci?n,Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci?n y Universidades · Israel National Institute of Energy Storage · Ministry of Economic Affairs Innovation, Digitalization and Energy of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia

References (73)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41586-023-06784-010.1038/s41586-023-06784-0 ↗
2. 10.1002/adfm.20221477410.1002/adfm.202214774 ↗
3. 10.1002/adma.20190276210.1002/adma.201902762 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.abm856610.1126/science.abm8566 ↗
5. 10.1039/C9EE02268F10.1039/C9EE02268F ↗
6. 10.1038/s41560-023-01442-110.1038/s41560-023-01442-1 ↗
7. 10.1002/smtd.20170028010.1002/smtd.201700280 ↗
8. 10.1007/s12598-020-01691-z10.1007/s12598-020-01691-z ↗
9. 10.1016/j.aca.2012.03.02710.1016/j.aca.2012.03.027 ↗
10. 10.1021/acsaem.8b0126310.1021/acsaem.8b01263 ↗
11. 10.1021/acsaem.0c0175110.1021/acsaem.0c01751 ↗
12. 10.1021/cm202296p10.1021/cm202296p ↗
13. 10.1002/aenm.20110023410.1002/aenm.201100234 ↗
14. 10.1021/cm501898y10.1021/cm501898y ↗
15. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.10043810.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100438 ↗
16. 10.1038/srep4026710.1038/srep40267 ↗
17. 10.1021/acsami.1c2084710.1021/acsami.1c20847 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10577410.1016/j.nanoen.2021.105774 ↗
19. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0004110.1021/acsenergylett.0c00041 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0071210.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00712 ↗
21. 10.1002/adfm.20190046610.1002/adfm.201900466 ↗
22. 10.1021/acsaem.2c0312710.1021/acsaem.2c03127 ↗
23. 10.1126/science.ade963710.1126/science.ade9637 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10850610.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108506 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2023.10836310.1016/j.nanoen.2023.108363 ↗
26. 10.1002/solr.20190004510.1002/solr.201900045 ↗
27. 10.1039/C9TA08084H10.1039/C9TA08084H ↗
28. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10628510.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106285 ↗
29. 10.1039/C7TC01224A10.1039/C7TC01224A ↗
30. 10.1002/aenm.20170072210.1002/aenm.201700722 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.solmat.2018.01.02510.1016/j.solmat.2018.01.025 ↗
32. 10.1002/aenm.20170351910.1002/aenm.201703519 ↗
33. 10.1039/C7NR08750K10.1039/C7NR08750K ↗
34. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.01710.1016/j.nanoen.2018.01.017 ↗
35. 10.1002/aenm.20190348710.1002/aenm.201903487 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.00410.1016/j.nanoen.2019.05.004 ↗
37. 10.1002/advs.20180216310.1002/advs.201802163 ↗
38. 10.1002/aenm.20180387210.1002/aenm.201803872 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10637410.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106374 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.06.00410.1016/j.joule.2020.06.004 ↗
41. 10.1088/1757-899X/490/2/02206710.1088/1757-899X/490/2/022067 ↗
42. 10.1007/s10008-019-04468-210.1007/s10008-019-04468-2 ↗
43. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b0542210.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05422 ↗
44. 10.1002/sia.302610.1002/sia.3026 ↗
45. 10.1039/C7TC03984K10.1039/C7TC03984K ↗
46. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.10484610.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104846 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.susc.2006.01.04110.1016/j.susc.2006.01.041 ↗
48. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c0254910.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02549 ↗
49. 10.1039/f1988840350110.1039/f19888403501 ↗
50. 10.1021/j100186a05610.1021/j100186a056 ↗
51. 10.1002/aenm.20150009110.1002/aenm.201500091 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0009-2614(96)01521-710.1016/S0009-2614(96)01521-7 ↗
53. Serjeant E. P. · 1979
54. 10.1021/jp065243d10.1021/jp065243d ↗
55. 10.1039/D2TA08488K10.1039/D2TA08488K ↗
56. 10.1002/adma.20150383210.1002/adma.201503832 ↗
57. 10.1002/pip.320310.1002/pip.3203 ↗
58. 10.1039/D1SE00369K10.1039/D1SE00369K ↗
59. 10.1039/C7EE02415K10.1039/C7EE02415K ↗
60. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.04210.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.042 ↗
61. Palomares E. · 2020 · 16110.1016/B978-0-12-814727-6.00007-4 ↗
62. 10.1002/pssr.20220033610.1002/pssr.202200336 ↗
63. 10.1021/acsphyschemau.3c0000210.1021/acsphyschemau.3c00002 ↗
64. 10.48550/arXiv.2402.0043910.48550/arXiv.2402.00439 ↗
65. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.01406110.1103/PhysRevApplied.19.014061 ↗
66. 10.1002/aenm.20220437010.1002/aenm.202204370 ↗
67. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b1057810.1021/acs.jpcc.9b10578 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.11.06710.1016/j.solener.2018.11.067 ↗
69. 10.1063/1.168939710.1063/1.1689397 ↗
70. 10.1063/1.159321810.1063/1.1593218 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.00310.1016/j.solmat.2019.03.003 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.02403110.1103/PhysRevApplied.14.024031 ↗
73. 10.48550/arXiv.2402.1028610.48550/arXiv.2402.10286 ↗