journal article·2022-01-12

Supervised Machine Learning-Aided SCAPS-Based Quantitative Analysis for the Discovery of Optimum Bromine Doping in Methylammonium Tin-Based Perovskite (MASnI3–xBrx)

Hasan Al Jame, Saugata Sarker, Md. Shafiqul Islam, Md. Tohidul Islam, Abrar Rauf, Sumaiyatul Ahsan, Sadiq Shahriyar Nishat, Md. Rafsun Jani, Kazi Md. Shorowordi, Joaquin Carbonara, Saquib Ahmed

Publisher page

Abstract

In this investigation, supervised machine learning (ML) was utilized to accurately predict the optimum bromine doping concentration in single-junction MASnI3–xBrx devices. Data-driven optimizations were carried out on 42 000 unique devices built utilizing a solar cell capacitance simulator (SCAPS). The devices were investigated through variations of bromine doping %, bandgap, electron affinity, series resistance, back-contact metal, and acceptor concentration─parameters that were specifically chosen because of their tunable nature and ability to be modified through facile experimental fabrication techniques of the device. Five different algorithms were utilized to explore feature engineering. The first step before bromine doping within the device included validation studies of a pure tin-based system, MASnI3: a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.71% was achieved, having close congruence with experimental data. ML analyses for optimal bromine doping resulted in the discovery of two devices with bromine concentrations of 22.43% (Br22) and 25.63% (Br25), with the latter being a more fine-tuned value obtained through extra rigorous analysis. To understand the total and relative impact of each feature on power conversion efficiency (PCE), Br22 and Br25 were analyzed with a state-of-the-art algorithm, namely, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) algorithm. Focusing on the two discovered devices, further device optimizations were carried out utilizing SCAPS. Modulations of absorber thickness, bulk and interfacial defect density, and choice of electron transport layer (ETL) and hole transport layer (HTL) materials were tried. Device stability was analyzed through carrier lifetime studies. Following these optimization steps, Br22 and Br25 demonstrated final high PCE values of 20.72 and 17.37%, respectively. The ML-assisted quantitative analysis of the current work provides significant confidence for optimal bromine-doped tin-based devices to be considered as viable and competitive nontoxic alternatives to traditional technologies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering (MME), Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET), East Campus, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh

Department of Materials Design and Innovation, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York 14260, United States

Department of Materials Science and Engineering (MSE), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 110 8th street, Troy, New York 12180, United States

Department of Mathematics, SUNY─Buffalo State, 1300 Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, New York 14222, United States

Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology, SUNY─Buffalo State, 1300 Elmwood Avenue, Buffalo, New York 14222, United States

Funding

State University of New York

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.22910.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.229 ↗
2. 10.1002/pip.285510.1002/pip.2855 ↗
3. 10.1021/ja809598r10.1021/ja809598r ↗
4. 10.1007/s42452-021-04487-710.1007/s42452-021-04487-7 ↗
5. 10.1007/s11664-018-6406-310.1007/s11664-018-6406-3 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10853-018-03265-y10.1007/s10853-018-03265-y ↗
7. 10.1002/advs.20170020410.1002/advs.201700204 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20140199110.1002/adma.201401991 ↗
9. 10.1021/ar00051a00710.1021/ar00051a007 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.308151010.1063/1.3081510 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.494122110.1063/1.4941221 ↗
12. 10.1515/nanoph-2020-063410.1515/nanoph-2020-0634 ↗
13. 10.1021/acsami.8b0946110.1021/acsami.8b09461 ↗
14. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.8210.1038/nphoton.2014.82 ↗
15. 10.1002/inf2.1202810.1002/inf2.12028 ↗
16. 10.1038/s41524-021-00495-810.1038/s41524-021-00495-8 ↗
17. Awad M. · 2015 · 110.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9 ↗
18. 10.1126/science.aaa841510.1126/science.aaa8415 ↗
19. 10.1007/s10822-020-00314-010.1007/s10822-020-00314-0 ↗
20. 10.1021/jp502340710.1021/jp5023407 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10115-007-0114-210.1007/s10115-007-0114-2 ↗
22. Rokach L. · 2007 · 69
23. 10.1007/s10844-012-0206-710.1007/s10844-012-0206-7 ↗
24. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
25. 10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2020.12519710.1016/J.JHYDROL.2020.125197 ↗
26. Oshiro T. M. · 2012 · 7376 · 15410.1007/978-3-642-31537-4_13 ↗
27. James G. · 2013 · 303
28. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.00910.1016/j.solener.2019.10.009 ↗
29. 10.1038/s41598-021-96222-w10.1038/s41598-021-96222-w ↗
30. Fonash S. J. · 2010 · 910.1016/B978-0-12-374774-7.00002-9 ↗
31. Dekker A. J. · 1981 · 36610.1007/978-1-349-00784-4_15 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.solener.2017.04.01810.1016/j.solener.2017.04.018 ↗
33. 10.1002/ADMA.20090431710.1002/ADMA.200904317 ↗
34. 10.1109/TED.2020.304538310.1109/TED.2020.3045383 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.solener.2018.04.01010.1016/j.solener.2018.04.010 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10951710.1016/j.optmat.2019.109517 ↗
37. 10.1007/s10853-018-03265-y10.1007/s10853-018-03265-y ↗
38. 10.1179/1753555712Y.000000003910.1179/1753555712Y.0000000039 ↗
39. 10.1002/aenm.20130191610.1002/aenm.201301916 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.optmat.2020.10995710.1016/j.optmat.2020.109957 ↗
41. 10.1007/s00339-019-2582-010.1007/s00339-019-2582-0 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.03.02310.1016/j.optmat.2019.03.023 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.10960710.1016/j.optmat.2019.109607 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.solener.2019.02.04110.1016/j.solener.2019.02.041 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.solener.2021.01.05810.1016/j.solener.2021.01.058 ↗
46. 10.1039/C4EE01076K10.1039/C4EE01076K ↗
47. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.8210.1038/nphoton.2014.82 ↗
48. 10.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3_410.1007/978-1-4614-6849-3_4 ↗
49. 10.1016/0169-7439(94)85050-X10.1016/0169-7439(94)85050-X ↗
50. 10.1002/aenm.20160045710.1002/aenm.201600457 ↗
51. 10.1039/c0dt01601b10.1039/c0dt01601b ↗
52. 10.1038/s41598-021-82817-w10.1038/s41598-021-82817-w ↗
53. 10.1126/science.aaa272510.1126/science.aaa2725 ↗
54. 10.1039/C7TA04608A10.1039/C7TA04608A ↗
55. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b0456510.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04565 ↗
56. 10.1002/adma.20170624610.1002/adma.201706246 ↗
57. 10.1039/c5ra21291j10.1039/c5ra21291j ↗
58. 10.1021/acsami.0c0133110.1021/acsami.0c01331 ↗
59. 10.1002/adfm.20150512710.1002/adfm.201505127 ↗
60. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b0104510.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01045 ↗
61. 10.1002/anie.20151179210.1002/anie.201511792 ↗
62. 10.1038/nenergy.2017.3210.1038/nenergy.2017.32 ↗
63. 10.1039/C8EE00956B10.1039/C8EE00956B ↗
64. 10.1038/s41467-018-07951-y10.1038/s41467-018-07951-y ↗
65. 10.1002/gch2.20190005010.1002/gch2.201900050 ↗
66. 10.1002/solr.20200029910.1002/solr.202000299 ↗